Skip to main content
Log in

Degradation process assessment of prestressed concrete continuous bridges in life-cycle

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To accurately evaluate the degradation process of prestressed concrete continuous bridges exposed to aggressive environments in life-cycle, a finite element-based approach with respect to the lifetime performance assessment of concrete bridges was proposed. The existing assessment methods were firstly introduced and compared. Some essential mechanics problems involved in the degradation process, such as the deterioration of materials properties, the reduction of sectional areas and the variation of overall structural performance caused by the first two problems, were investigated and solved. A computer program named CBDAS (Concrete Bridge Durability Analysis System) was written to perform the above-metioned approach. Finally, the degradation process of a prestressed concrete continuous bridge under chloride penetration was discussed. The results show that the concrete normal stress for serviceability limit state exceeds the threshold value after 60 a, but the various performance indicators at ultimate limit state are consistently in the allowable level during service life. Therefore, in the case of prestressed concrete bridges, the serviceability limit state is more possible to have durability problems in life-cycle; however, the performance indicators at ultimate limit state can satisfy the requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LU Mu. Recent study and research directions of concrete durability [J]. Industrial Construction, 1997, 27(5): 1–6, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CHEN Ai-rong. Design process of bridges based on given structural life [M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2009: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. KUNISHIMA M, OKAMURA H. Durability design for concrete structures [C]// Proceedings of IABSE Symposium. Lisbon, Portugal, 1989: 505–510.

  4. The European Union-Brite Euram III. General guidelines for durability design and redesign [R]. BE95-1347. Bruxelles: Brite-Euram, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. CHEN D, MAHADEVAN S. Chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion and concrete cracking simulation [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, 30(3): 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DARMAWAN M S, STEWART M G. Spatial time dependent reliability analysis of corroding pretensioned prestressed concrete bridge girders [J]. Structural Safety, 2007, 29(1): 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. TIAN Hao. Research on structure performance evolution of concrete bridges in given service life [D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. LI Guo-ping. Bridge structure analysis composite system [M]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 1998: 6–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LI Guo-ping. Prestressed concrete technology and design principle in bridge [M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2004: 126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. XIAO Ru-cheng. Bridge structure analysis and program system [M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2002: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LEE H S, NOGUCHI T, TOMOSAWA F. FEM analysis for structural performance of deteriorated RC structures due to rebar corrosion [C]// Proceedings of the second International Conference on Concrete Under Severe Conditions. Tromso, Norway, 1998: 327–336.

  12. JUNG W Y, YOON Y S, SOHN Y M. Predicting the remaining service life of land concrete by steel corrosion [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2003, 33(5): 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. AKGUL F, FRANGOPOL D M. Lifetime performance analysis of existing reinforced concrete bridges. I: Theory [J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005, 11(2): 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. AKGUL F, FRANGOPOL D M. Lifetime performance analysis of existing reinforced concrete bridges. II: Application [J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005, 11(2): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AKGUL F, FRANGOPOL D M. Lifetime performance analysis of existing prestressed concrete bridge superstructures [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1889–1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DARMAWAN M S, STEWART M G. Effect of pitting corrosion on capacity of prestressing wires [J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2007, 59(2): 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. CECS 220. Standard for durability assessment of concrete structures [S]. 2007.

  18. JTGD62-2004. Code for design reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts [S]. 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Tian  (田浩).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2006.318.223.02-01) supported by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications through the Scientific and Technological Funds of China; Project(2007AA11Z104) supported by the High Technology Research and Development of China; Project(20090072110045) supported by the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, H., Li, Gp. & Chen, Ar. Degradation process assessment of prestressed concrete continuous bridges in life-cycle. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 19, 1411–1418 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1157-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1157-4

Key words

Navigation