Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of dioxin reduction on chemical composition of sintering exhaust gas with adding urea

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the addition of urea as an inhibitor, four groups of reducing dioxin emission experiments in sintering pot were conducted. The results show that, adding 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% (mass fraction) urea, the emission concentrations of dioxin are 0.287, 0.258 and 0.217 ng-TEQ/m3, respectively. The dioxin emission rates drop substantially compared to 0.777 ng-TEQ/m3 free of urea. With an increase of the urea content, the concentration of SO2 emission reduces sharply. (NH4)2SO4, formed by the reaction of SO2 and NH3, goes into the dust and part of NH3 is released before reaction with the emission of exhaust gas. The NO x emission presents an increasing trend because the reaction of NH3 and O2 at high temperature produces NO x . Based on the consideration of factors such as the effect of reducing dioxin emission, and the chemical composition of exhaust gas, 0.05% is the optimum adding content of urea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CHEN Yu-cheng, TSAI Perng-jy, MOU Jin-luh. Determining optimal operation parameters for reducing PCDD/F emissions (I-TEQ values) from the iron ore sintering process by using the Taguchi experimental design [J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 5298–5303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BOSCOLO M, PADOANO E, TOMMASI S. Identification of possible dioxin emission reduction strategies in pre-existing iron ore sinter plants [J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2008, 35(2): 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MENDA N, TAYIBI H, FEMANDO G C, HERMANDEZ A. Minimization methods for emissions generated from sinter strands: A review [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006, 14: 740–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. STANMORE B R. The formation of dioxins in combustion systems [J]. Combustion and Frame, 2004, 136(3): 398–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. PRASHANT S.K, JOAO G. C, CARLOS A M A. Dioxins sources and current remediation technologies-A review [J]. Environment International, 2008, 34: 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISHII K, FURUICHI T. Development of bioreactor system for treatment of dioxin-contaminated soil using pseudallescheria boydii [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 148(3): 693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. MASANORI N, KAZUYUKI M, TAKEHIKO S. Factors accelerating dioxin emission from iron ore sintering machines [J]. ISIJ Int, 2009, 49(5): 729–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. SHUNJI K, YUICHI Y, KAZUOMI W. Investigation on the dioxin emission from a commercial sintering plant [J]. ISIJ Int, 2006, 46(7): 1014–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MASANORI N, YOHZOH H, EIKI K. Observation of behavior of dioxins and some relating elements in iron ore sintering bed by quenching pot test [J]. ISIJ Int, 2005, 45(4): 609–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EIKI K, SHUNSUKE K, HIROSHI G, TAICHI M. Reduction in dioxin emissions by the addition of urea as aqueous solution to high-temperature combustion gas [J]. ISIJ Int, 2008, 48(9): 1305–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CHENG He-fa, HU Yua-nan. Curbing dioxin emissions from municipal solid waste incineration in China: Re-thinking about management policies and practices [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158(9): 2809–2814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. CELINE X, EDWIN D P. Prevention of dioxins de novo formation by ethanolamines [J]. Environ Chem Lett, 2003, 1: 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. FICARELLA A, LAFORGIA D. Numerical simulation of flow-field and dioxins chemistry for incineration plants and experimental investigation [J]. Waste Management, 2000, 20: 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. VALERIE M T, COLIN M M. Relation of chlorine, copper and sulphur to dioxin emission factors [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 151(1): 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ANDERSON D R, FISHER R. Sources of dioxins in the United Kingdom: The steel industry and other sources [J]. Chemosphere, 2002, 46: 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. LONG Hong-ming, LI Jia-xin, WANG Ping, GAO Gang, ZHANG Jian. Reaction mechanism of emission of dioxin by addition of urea in iron ore sintering process [J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2010, 10(5): 944–949.

    Google Scholar 

  17. LIAO Ji-yong, BI Xue-gong, XIONG Wei, JIN Yan. Simulation research for sintering waste gas desulfurization [J]. Sintering and Pelletizing, 2006, 31(6): 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. BI Xue-gong, LIAO Ji-yong, XIONG Wei, ZHOU Gou-fan, FENG Zhi-hui. Experimental study of SO2 and NOx removal during sintering process [J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2008, 31(5): 449–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong-ming Long  (龙红明).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50904001) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2010SQRL032D) supported by Anhui Provincial Key Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Talent, China; Project(TD200909) supported by Program for Innovative Research Team in Anhui University of Technology, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Long, Hm., Li, Jx. & Wang, P. Influence of dioxin reduction on chemical composition of sintering exhaust gas with adding urea. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 19, 1359–1363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1150-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1150-y

Key words

Navigation