Skip to main content
Log in

An improved adaptive response surface method for structural reliability analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response surface method (RSM) is one of the main approaches for analyzing reliability problems with implicit performance functions. An improved adaptive RSM based on uniform design (UD) and double weighted regression (DWR) was presented. In the proposed method, the basic principle of the iteratively adaptive response surface method is applied. Uniform design is used to sample the fitting points. And a double weighted regression system considering the distances from the fitting points to the limit state surface and to the estimated design points is set to determine the coefficients of the response surface model. Compared with the conventional approaches, the fitting points selected by UD are more representative, and a better approximation in the key region is also observed with DWR. Numerical examples show that the proposed method has good convergent capability and computational accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. QIN Q L, LING D J, MEI Q. Theory and applications-reliability stochastic finite element methods [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006: 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  2. KAYMAZ I, MCMAHON C A. A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 20: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DUPRAT F, SELLIER A. Probabilistic approach to corrosion risk due to carbonation via an adaptive response surface method [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2006, 21: 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. BUCHER C, MOST T. A comparison of approximate response functions in structural analysis [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 23: 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. HUANG S, KOU X J. An extended stochastic response surface method for random field problems [J]. Acta Mech Sin, 2007, 23: 445–450.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. GAYTON N, BOURINET J M, LEMAIRE M. CQ2RS: A new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis [J]. Structural Safety, 2003, 25: 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. GAVIN H P, YAU S C. High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis [J]. Structural Safety, 2008, 30(30): 79–162.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BUCHER C G, BOURGRUND U. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems [J]. Structural Safety, 1990, 7: 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. RAJASHEKHAR M R, ELLINGWOOD B R. A new look at response surface approach for reliability [J]. Structural Safety, 1993, 12: 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. KIM S H, NA S. Response surface method using vector projected sampling points [J]. Structural Safety, 1997, 19: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ZHAO Y G, TETSURO O. Moment methods for structural reliability [J]. Structural Safety, 2001, 23: 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. TONG X L, ZHAO G F. The response surface method in conjunction with geometric method in structural reliability analysis [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 1997, 30(4): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GAVIN H P, YAU S C. High-order limit state function in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis [J]. Structural Safety, 2008, 30: 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. CHOWDHURY R N, XU D W. Rational polynomial technique in slope reliability analysis [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 1993, 119(12): 1910–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DENG J, GU D S. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network [J]. Structural Safety, 2005, 27: 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. JIN C. A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis [J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 23: 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DENG J. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis functions network [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43: 3255–3291.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. KAYMAZ I. Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems [J]. Structural Safety, 2005, 27: 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. FARAVELLI L. Response-surface approach for reliability analysis [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1989, 115: 2763–2781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ZHOU H L, WU J G, WANG H J. Reliability analysis of response surface method based on a double weighted regression technique [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology, 2010, 38(2): 218–221.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. FANG K T. Uniform design and uniform design table [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1994: 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Li  (李云).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50774095) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(200449) supported by National Outstanding Doctoral Dissertations Special Funds of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, J., Li, Y. An improved adaptive response surface method for structural reliability analysis. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 19, 1148–1154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1121-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1121-3

Key words

Navigation