Journal of Central South University

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 578–585 | Cite as

Wing crack model subjected to high hydraulic pressure and far field stresses and its numerical simulation

  • Yan-lin Zhao (赵延林)
  • Ping Cao (曹平)
  • Wei-jun Wang (王卫军)
  • Wen Wan (万文)
  • Rui Chen (陈锐)


By considering the effect of hydraulic pressure filled in wing crack and the connected part of main crack on the stress intensity factor at wing crack tip, a new wing crack model exerted by hydraulic pressure and far field stresses was proposed. By introducing the equivalent crack length leq of wing crack, two terms make up the stress intensity factor KI at wing crack tip: one is the component KI(1) for a single isolated straight wing crack of length 2l subjected to hydraulic pressure in wing crack and far field stresses, and the other is the component KI(2) due to the effective shear stress induced by the presence of the equivalent main crack. The FEM model of wing crack propagation subjected to hydraulic pressure and far field stresses was also established according to different side pressure coefficients and hydraulic pressures in crack. The result shows that a good agreement is found between theoretical model of wing crack proposed and finite element method (FEM). In theory, an unstable crack propagation is shown if there is high hydraulic pressure and lateral tension. The wing crack model proposed can provide references for studying on hydraulic fracturing in rock masses.

Key words

rock mechanics wing crack hydraulic pressure numerical simulation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    CAI M. Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries-Insight from numerical modeling [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2008, 45: 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    SAHOURYEH E, DYSKIN A V, GERMANOVICH L N. Crack growth under biaxial compression [J]. Eng Fract Mech, 2002, 69(18): 2187–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    CAI M, KAISER P K. Assessment of excavation damaged zone using micromechanics model [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20(4): 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    ASHBY M F, SAMMIS. The damage mechanics of brittle solids in compression [J]. Pageoph, 1990, 133(3): 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    HORII H, NEMAT-NASSER S. Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: Axial splitting and shear failure [J]. J Geophys Res, 1985, 90: 3105–3125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    HORII H, NEMAT-NASSER S. Brittle failure in compression: Splitting, faulting and brittle-ductile transition [J]. Phil Trans R. Soc Lond A, 1986, 139: 337–374.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    ASHBY M F, HALLAM S D. The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states [J]. Acta Metall, 1986, 34: 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    STEIF P S. Crack extension under compressive loading [J]. Engng Fract Mech, 1984, 20: 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    BAUD P, REUSCHLE T, CHARLEZ P. An improved wing crack model for the deformation and failure of rock in compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts, 1996, 33(5): 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    WANG Yuan-han, XU Yue, TAN Guo-hua. An improved calculative model for wing crack [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(5): 612–615. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    NAKASHIMA Y. Buoyancy-driven propagation of an isolated fluid-filled crack in rock: Implication for fluid transport in metamorphism [J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1993, 11(4): 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    TANG Lian-sheng, ZHANG Peng-cheng, WANG Si-jing. Testing study on effects of chemical action of aqueous solution on crack propagation in rock [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(6): 822–827. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    ZHUANG Ning. Propagation rule of crack rock mass and its mathematics model research under the hydraulic-stress coupling [D]. Shanghai: TongJi University, 2006: 111–112. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    KATSUMI, N, HIROKAZU M, HIROAKI, N, NORIYOSHI T. Mechanical and hydraulic coupling of injection-induced slip along pre-existing fractures [J]. Geothermics, 2008, 37: 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    LEE M Y, HAIMSON B C. Statistical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement parameters [J]. Int J Rock Mech Min, Sci & Geomech Abstr, 1989, 26: 447–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    LUO Xiao-rong, VASSEUR G. Natural hydraulic cracking: numerical model and sensitivity study [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 20(1): 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    PAPANASTASIOU P C. A coupled elastoplastic hydraulic fracturing model [J]. Int J Rock Mech & Min Sci, 1997, 34: 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    ZHAO Y L, CAO P, WANG W J. Viscoelasto-plastic rheological experiment under circular increment step load and unload and nonlinear creep model of soft rocks [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2009, 16(3): 484–491.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    LAUTERBACH B, GROSS D. Crack growth in brittle solids under compression [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1998, 29: 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    LEE S, RABICHANDRAN G. Crack initiation in brittle solids under multiaxial compression [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2003, 70: 1645–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    DYSKIM A V, SAHOURYEH E, JEWELL R J, JOER J H, USTINOV K B. Influence of shape and locations of initial 3-D cracks on their growth in uniaxial compression [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2003, 70: 2115–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    SAHOURYEH E, DYSKIM A V, GERMANOVICH L N. Crack growth under biaxial compression [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2002, 69: 2187–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    YU Xiao-zhong. Fracture mechanics of rock and concrete [M]. Changsha: Central South University of Technology Press, 1991: 20–21. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    AYATOLLAHI M R, ALIHA M R M. Wide range data for crack tip parameters in two disc-type specimens under mixed model loading [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2007, 38(4): 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    ZHAO Yan-lin, CAO Ping, WEN You-dao. Damage fracture failure mechanism of compressive-shear rock cracks under seepage pressure [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2008, 39(4): 838–844. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan-lin Zhao (赵延林)
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ping Cao (曹平)
    • 3
  • Wei-jun Wang (王卫军)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wen Wan (万文)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rui Chen (陈锐)
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Energy and Safety EngineeringHunan University of Science and TechnologyXiangtanChina
  2. 2.Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques of Coal MinesHunan University of Science and TechnologyXiangtanChina
  3. 3.School of Resources and Safety EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations