Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative study of atmospheric effects in spaceborne InSAR measurements

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atmospheric effects on interferometric synthetic aperture radar(InSAR) measurements are quantitatively studied based on a tandem pair of SAR data and a month-long continuous GPS tracking data obtained at six stations. Differential atmospheric signals extracted from the SAR data for two selected areas show apparent power law characteristics. The RMS values of the signals are 2.04 and 3.66 rad respectively for the two areas. These differential delays can potentially cause in the two areas peak-to-peak deformation errors of 3.64 and 6.52 cm, respectively, at the 95% confidence level and Gaussian distribution. The respective potential peak-to-peak DEM errors are 123 and 221 m. The GPS tropospheric total zenith delays estimate indicates that a peak-to-peak error of about 7.8 cm can potentially be caused in a SAR interferogram with only 1 d interval at the 95% confidence level. The error increases to about 9.6 cm for 10 d interval. The potential peak-to-peak DEM and deformation errors estimated from GPS total zenith delay measurements are however quite similar to those estimated from InSAR data. This provides us with a useful tool to pre-estimate the potential atmospheric effects in a SAR interferogram before we order the SAR images. Nevertheless, the results reveal that even in a small area the atmospheric delays can obscure centimetre level ground displacements and introduce a few hundred meters of errors to derived DEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldstein R M. Atmospheric limitations to repeattrack radar interferometry[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1995, 22(18): 2517–2520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zebker H A, Rosen P A, Hensley S. Atmospheric effects in interferometric synthetic aperture radar surface deformation and topographic maps[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(B4): 7547–7563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanssen R F. Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanssen R F, Wechwerth T M, Zebker H A, et al. High-resolution water vapor mapping from interferometric radar measurements[J]. Science, 1999, 283: 1297–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Z W, Ding X L, Liu G X, et al. Atmospheric effects on InSAR measurements—a review[J]. Geomatics Research Australasia, 2003, 79: 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li Z W, Ding X L, Liu G X. Modeling atmospheric effects on InSAR with meteorological and continuous GPS observations: algorithms and some test results [J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2004, 66: 907–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarayre H, Massonnet D. Atmospheric propagation heterogeneties revealed by ERS-1 [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1996, 23(9): 989–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tatarski V I. Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanssen R F. Atmospheric Heterogeneities in ERS Tandem SAR Interferometry[M]. Felft: Delft University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ruf C S, Beus S E. Retrieval of tropospheric water vapor scale height from horizontal turbulence structure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(2): 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F. Multibaseline InSAR DEM reconstruction: the wavelet approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(2): 705–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferretti A, Prati C, Rocca F. Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatters in differential SAR interferometry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2000, 38(5): 2202–2212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Y X. Remote Sensing of Water Vapor Content Using GPS Data in Hong Kong Region[D]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen P A, Hensley S, Zebker H A, et al. Surface deformation and coherence measurements of kilauea volcano, hawaii, from SIR-C radar interferometry [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1996, 101(E10): 23109–23125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LI Zhi-wei. Modelling Atmospheric Effects in Repeat-pass InSAR Measurements [D]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Zhi-wei PhD.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project (40404001) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; project (WKL(03)0104) supported by the State Key Laboratory for Information Engineering of Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Zw., Ding, Xl., Zhu, Jj. et al. Quantitative study of atmospheric effects in spaceborne InSAR measurements. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 12, 494–498 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0189-4

Key words

CLC number

Navigation