Abstract
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) membranes with different molecular mass cut-offs were used to treat oil/water emulsion, and the effects of experimental conditions including pressure, temperature and different operating modes on permeate flux and removal rate of chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) were studied. The results show that the permeate flux of ultrafiltration membrane is influenced by pressure and temperature; practical pressure is chosen to be 0.3 – 0.7 MPa for the PEG with molecular mass cut-offs of 8 000 and 0.7 – 1.0 MPa for the PEG with molecular mass cut-offs of 2 500; and the practical temperature is chosen to be 25 – 32 °C. Different operating modes of ultrafiltration also influence the permeate flux and removal rate of CODCr. The ultrafiltration membrane of intermittent cross-flow operating mode is easier to be influenced by blocky polarization and contamination than that of sequential cross-flow operating mode. Removal rate of CODCr in intermittent cross-flow and sequential cross-flow condition can be maintained at about 93%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sheng H L, Wen J L. Treatment of waste oil/water emulsion by ultrafiltration and ion exchange[J]. Water Research, 1998, 32(9): 2680–2688.
LU Shan-zhong, QIAN Kun-min. New method to treat waste emulsion[J]. Water and Wastewater Engineering, 2000, 26(7): 39–45.
LU Bin, LU Xiao-qian. Engineering application of treating technology of oily emulsified wastewater[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2001, 19(3): 12–15. (in Chinese)
Kunikane S, Magara Y, Itoh M, et al. A comparative study on the application of membrane technology to the public water supply[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1995, 102(5): 149–154.
Wiesner M R, Chelam S. The promise of the membrane technology[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33(17): 360–366.
Cortalezzi M M, Rose J, Wells G F, et al. Ceramic membranes derived from ferroxane nanoparticles: a new route for the fabrication of iron oxide ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 227(2): 207–217.
Bansal I K. Concentration of oily and latex wastewater using ultrafiltration inorganic membranes[J]. Ind Water Engineering, 1976, 13(10): 6–15.
Bodzek M, Konieczng K. The use of ultrafiltration membranes made of various polymers in the treatment of oil-emulsion wastewaters[J]. Waste Management, 1992, 12: 75–86.
Lin S H, Lan W J. Waste oil/water emulsion treatment by membrane processes[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1998, 59: 189–199.
ZHANG Guo-jun, LIU Zhong-zhou. Development of the mechanism and the controlled technique of ultrafiltration membrane fouling [J]. Membrane Science and Technology, 2001, 21(4): 39–46. (in Chinese)
Kim K J, Fane A G, Fell C J D, et al. Fouling mechanisms of membranes during protein ultrafiltration[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1992, 68(1): 79–91.
Ribeiro T H, Rubio J, Smith R W. A dried hydrophobic acquaphyte as an oil filter for oil/water emulsions[J]. Spill Science and Technology Bulletin, 2003, 8(5): 483–489.
WANG Xiao-chang, WANG Jin. Kinetic study of membrane fouling under cross-flow ultrafiltration operation[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2002, 21(6): 552–558. (in Chinese)
Crozes G F, Jacangelo J G, Anselme C, et al. Impact of ultrafiltration operation conditions on membrane irreversible fouling[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 124(1): 63–76.
WU Guang-xia, ZHANG Dong-hua, QIAN Yan-jun. The fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membrane module[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2002, 21(4): 389–3428. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Project(50308011) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
He, Dw., Xiao, Yt., Li, X. et al. Treatment of oil/water emulsion by polyethylene glycol ultrafiltration membrane. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 12, 542–545 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0119-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0119-5