Skip to main content
Log in

Using hybrid modeling for life cycle assessment of motor bike and electric bike

  • Life Cycle Technology And Life Cycle Assessment
  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is environmental evaluation of products, materials, and processes over their life cycle. Truncation uncertainty and corresponding uncertainty are main problems occurred in process life cycle assessment (PLCA) modeling and economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIOLCA) modeling. Through combination of these two modelings in different life cycle stage and use of an uncertainty reduction strategy, a hybrid life cycle assessment modeling method was proposed in this study. Case studies were presented on gasoline-powered motorbikes (M-bike) and electricity-powered electric bike (E-bike). Web-based software was developed to analyze process environmental impacts. Results show that the largest part of life cycle energy (LCE) is consumed at use stage. Less energy is consumed in life cycle of E-bike than that of M-bike. GWP (Global Warming Potential), CO (Carbon Monoxide), PM10 (particulate matter) emission of M-bike are higher than that of E-bike, especially at use stage, AP (acidification Potential) emission of E-bike is higher than that of M-bike. Comprehensively, E-bike is energy efficient and less emitting, and better choice for urban private transportation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maurice B, Frischknecht R, Coelho-Schwirtz V, et al. Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory: application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2000, 8: 95–108.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Heather L, MacLean, Lave L B. Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2003, 29: 1–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lave L B, Cobas-Flores E, Hendrickson C T, et al. Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 29: 420A-426A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azapagic A. Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimisation [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 1999, 73: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen A M, Weidema B P. Input/output analysis-Shortcuts to life cycle data[R]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquetta J, Lee P, O’Callaghan, et al. Critical review of life cycle analysis and assessment techniques and their application to commercial activities[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1995, 13: 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 14040. Environmental Management-life Cycle Assessment-principles and Framework[S].

  8. Guinee J B. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment[M]. New York: Kluwer Academic Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Todd J A T. Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment: A Final Report from the SETAC[R]. Belgium: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi S, Lansing E. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2002, 3: 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Treloar G J. Extracting embodied energy paths from input-output tables: towards an input-output-based hybrid energy analysis method[J]. Economic Systems Research, 1997, 4: 375–378.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department of National Accounts, National Statistics Bureau of China. Input-output Table[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. GB/T4754-94, National Economic Sector Classification and Codes[S].

  15. Wang M Q. GREET 1.5-Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model Volume 1: Methodology, Development, Use, and Results[R]. Dearborn, USA: Agronne Information and Publishing Division, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Environmental Protection Bureau. Handbook for Industrial Pollutants and Emission Factors [M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996. 10–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dai Du.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project (G-0205-06347) supported by David and Lucile Packard Foundation in Partnership with the US Energy Foundation; Project (ICA4-2002-10023) supported by European Union

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, D., Leng, Rb., Zhang, C. et al. Using hybrid modeling for life cycle assessment of motor bike and electric bike. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 12, 77–80 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0014-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-005-0014-0

Key words

CLC number

Navigation