Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between attachment probability and surface energy in adhesion process of gold particles to oil-carbon agglomerates

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the theoretical analyses, the adhesion process of fine gold particles to oil-carbon agglomerates in a dynamic system was quantitatively investigated in terms of the relationship between the attachment probability and the surface energy. The proposed way to establish this relationship is to firstly theoretically derive the formula to evaluate the surface energy change of the system by analyzing the adhesion process of a gold particle on an oil-carbon agglomerate in a mathematic and thermodynamic way. The obtained formula of the maximum energy change of unit surface area is, Δwmax=1/2σhw(cos ϑ−1), which involves two measurable elements: interfacial tension and contact angle. In a well-quantified system, based on the related model it is also possible to calculate the complicated concept, namely, the attachment probability by transferring other measurable indices. In this way, after some adhesion experiments and measurements of relevant parameters, the empirical relationship between the attachment probability and the surface energy change was established in an exponential function, P a=Aexp(−ΔG surf/k).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schulze H J. Physical-chemical Elementary Processes in Flotation[M]. New York: Elsevier, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anfruns J F, kitchener J A. Flotation [M]. New York: AIME, 1976,2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Solari J A, Gochin R J. Colloid Chemistry in Mineral Processing[M]. New York: Elsevier, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Polat M, Chander S. First-order flotation kinetics models and methods for estimation of the true distribution of flotation rate constants [J]. Int J Miner Process, 2000,58(3): 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cadzow M, Lamb R. CARBAD gold recovery[A]. Randol International Gold Conference [C]. Nevada, USA, 1989.

  6. House C I, Veal C J. Coal gold agglomeration-pilot scale retreatment of tailings[A]. Randol International Gold Conference[C]. Perth, Australia, 1988.

  7. ZHAO B, LU L S. Application of ‘air-lift’ adsorption tower in CGA process[J]. Gold, 1997, 18(6): 38–42, (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calvez J P S, Kim M J. Use of coal-oil agglomerate for particulate gold recovery[J]. Minerals Engineering, 1998, 11(9): 803–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. House C, Townsend I and Veal C J. Coal gold agglomeration [J]. International Mining, 1988, 50(9): 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. WU X Q. Modelling Carbon-gold-oil Agglomeration [D]. London: Imperial College Library, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erb R A. Wettability of metals under continuous condensation conditions[J]. J Phys Chem, 1965, 69(4): 1306–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aksoy B S, Yarar B. Natural hydrophobicity of native gold flakes and their flotation under different conditions[A]. Proceedings of Complex Ores[C]. Halifax, Nova Scotia, 1989.

  13. Christina R, Hamelmand A, Lins F F. A non-polluting technology to recover gold: the gold-paraffin process[A]. Proceedings of the 20th IMPC [C]. Aachen, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Xi-qing PhD.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project supported by Scholarship of Imperial College, University of London

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Xq., Monhemius, A.J. & Gochin, R.J. Relationship between attachment probability and surface energy in adhesion process of gold particles to oil-carbon agglomerates. J Cent. South Univ. Technol. 10, 318–323 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-003-0031-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-003-0031-9

Key words

CLC number

Navigation