Skip to main content
Log in

High-order generalized screen propagator migration based on particle swarm optimization

  • Published:
Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various migration methods have been proposed to image high-angle geological structures and media with strong lateral velocity variations; however, the problems of low precision and high computational cost remain unresolved. To describe the seismic wave propagation in media with lateral velocity variations and to image high-angle structures, we propose the generalized screen propagator based on particle swarm optimization (PSO-GSP), for the precise fitting of the single-square-root operator. We use the 2D SEG/EAGE salt model to test the proposed PSO-GSP migration method to image the faults beneath the salt dome and compare the results to those of the conventional high-order generalized screen propagator (GSP) migration and split-step Fourier (SSF) migration. Moreover, we use 2D marine data from the South China Sea to show that the PSO-GSP migration can better image strong reflectors than conventional imaging methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baysal, E., Kosloff, D. D., and Sherwood, J. W. C., 1983, Reverse time migration: Geophysics, 48, 1514–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byoung, Y. K., Seol, S. J., Ho-Young L., and Joongmoo B., 2016, Prestack elastic generalized-screen migration for multicomponent data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 126(3), 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. B., 2010, On the selection of reference velocities for split-step Fourier and generalized-screen migration methods: Geophysics, 75(6), 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claerbout, J. F., 1985, Imaging the earth's interior: Blackwell scientific publication, Inc., Cambridge, MA,USA, 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoop, M. V., Le Rousseau, J. H., and Wu, R. S., 2000, Generalization of the phase-screen approximation for the scattering of acoustic waves: Wave Motion, 31, 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. J., and Margrave, G. F., 2005, Planned seismic imaging using explicit one-way operators: Geophysics, 70(5), S101–S109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazdag, J., 1978, Wave equation migration with the phaseshift method: Geophysics, 43, 1342–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelamis, P. G., 1988, On the theory of Chebyshev polynomial in wave-equation migration: Geophysical Journal International, 94, 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. C., 1995, Particle Swarm Optimization: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942–1948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. C., 2001, Swarm Intelligence: Morgan Kaufmann publication, San Francisco, 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Rousseau, J. H., and de Hoop, M. V., 2001, Modeling and imaging with the scalar generalized-screen algorithms in isotropic media: Geophysics, 66, 1551–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. N., and Zhang, J. F., 2006, 3D wavefield extrapolation with optimum split-step Fourier method: Geophysics, 71(3), T95–T108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M., 1996, An introduction to genetic algorithms: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristow, D., and Rühl, T., 1994, Fourier finite-difference migration: Geophysics, 59, 1882–1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristow, D., and Rühl, T., 1997, Optimized operators for 3-D Fourier finite-difference migration: Journal of Seismic Exploration, 6, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. A., 1987, Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimension: Geophysics, 43(1), 691–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S., Byun, J., and Seol, S. J., 2015, Imaging tilted transversely isotropic media with a generalized screen propagator: Exploration Geophysics, 46(4), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffa, R. H., 1978, Migration by Fourier transform: Geophysics, 43(1), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffa, P. L., Fokkema, J. T., de Luna Freire, R. M., and Kessinger, W. P., 1990, Split-step Fourier migration: Geophysics, 55, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. H., Wang, W. M., Wang, S. Q., and Yao, Z. X., 2010, Optimized Chebyshev Fourier migration: A wideangle dual-domain method for media with strong velocity contrasts: Geophysics, 75(2), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. M., Chen, S. C., and Ren, H. R., 2014, One way wave equation least squares migration based on illumination compensation: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 57(8), 2644–2655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, S. W., Zhang, J. H., and Yao, Z. X., 2008, Globally optimized Fourier finite difference operator using simulated annealing algorithm based on parameter: Chinese Journal Geophysics (in Chinese), 51(6), 1844–1850.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ye Yue-Ming, Wu Bang-Yu, and Fang Gang, Dr. Fang Yuan of the China Geological Survey, and Dr. Liu Zhi-Wei of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences for comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Run He.

Additional information

This research work is supported by the 863 Program of China (No. 2013AA064201) and National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2016ZX05003-003).

He Run is a PhD student at the China University of Geoscience (Beijing). His research interests are migration imaging and reservoir prediction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, R., You, JC., Liu, B. et al. High-order generalized screen propagator migration based on particle swarm optimization. Appl. Geophys. 14, 64–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-017-0602-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-017-0602-4

Keywords

Navigation