Abstract
The accurate and reliable interpretation of regional land cover data is very important for natural resource monitoring and environmental assessment. At present, refined land cover data are mainly obtained by manual visual interpretation, which has the problems of heavy workload and inconsistent interpretation scales. Deep learning has greatly improved the automatic processing and analysis of remote sensing data. However, the accurate interpretation of feature information from massive datasets remains a difficult problem in wide regional land cover classification. To improve the efficiency of deep learning-based remote sensing image interpretation, we selected multisource remote sensing data, assessed the interpretability of the U-Net model based on surface spatial scenes with different levels of complexity, and proposed a new method of stereoscopic accuracy verification (SAV) to evaluate the reliability of the classification result. The results show that classification accuracy is more highly correlated with terrain and landscape than with other factors related to image data, such as platform and spatial resolution. As the complexity of surface spatial scenes increases, the accuracy of the classification results mainly shows a fluctuating declining trend. We also find the distribution characteristics from the SAV evaluation results of different land cover types in each surface spatial scene. Based on the results observed in this study, we consider the distinction of interpretability and reliability in diverse ground object types and design targeted classification strategies for different surface scenes, which can greatly improve the classification efficiency. The key achievement of this study is to provide the theoretical basis for remote sensing information analysis and an accuracy evaluation method for regional land cover classification, and the proposed method can help improve the likelihood that intelligent interpretation can replace manual acquisition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam H, Chen L C, Papandreou G et al., 2018. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 801–818. doi: 10.1007-978-3-030-01234-2_49
Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, Cipolla R, 2017. Segnet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(12): 2481–2495. doi: 10.1199-TAAMI.0016.2644615
Bicheron P, Defourny P, Brockmann C et al., 2011. GLOBCOVER: products description and validation report. Foro Mundial De La Salud, 17(3): 285–287.
Carranza-García M, García-Gutiérrez J, Riquelme J C, 2019. A framework for evaluating land use and land cover classification using convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 11(3): 274. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030274
Cevikalp H, Benligiray B, Gerek O N, 2020. Semi-supervised robust deep neural networks for multi-label image classification. Pattern Recognition, 100: 107164. doi: 10.1016-j.patcog.2019.107164
Chen G S, Li C, Wei W et al., 2019. Fully convolutional neural network with augmented atrous spatial pyramid pool and fully connected fusion path for high resolution remote sensing image segmentation. Applied Sciences, 9(9): 1816. doi: 10.3390-app9091816
Chen Jun, Liao Anping, Chen Jin et al., 2017. 30-Meter global land cover data product- globe land30. Geomatics World, 24(1): 1–8. (in Chinese)
Chen L C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I et al., 2017. Deeplab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 40(4): 834–848. doi: 10.1109-TPAMI.2017.2699184
Congalton R G, 1988. Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to explore the errors in maps generated from remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(5): 587–592. doi: 10.1109-36.3037
Congalton R G, 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1): 35–46. doi: 10.1016-0034-4257(91)90048-B
De Fries R S, Hansen M, Townshend J R G et al., 1998. Global land cover classifications at 8 km spatial resolution: the use of training data derived from landsat imagery in decision tree classifiers. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(16): 3141–3168. doi: 10.1080-014311698214235
Gastaldo P, Zunino R, Heynderickx I et al., 2005. Objective quality assessment of displayed images by using neural networks. Signal Processing:Image Communication, 20(7): 643–661. doi: 10.1016-j.image.2005.03.013
Gong P, Liu H, Zhang M N et al., 2019. Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017. Science Bulletin, 64: 370–373. doi: 10.1016-j.scib.2019.03.002
Guo Chongzhou, Li Ke, Li He, 2020. Deep convolution neural network method for remote sensing image quality classification. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 1–9. (in Chinese)
Guo R, Liu J B, Li N et al., 2018. Pixel-wise classification method for high resolution remote sensing imagery using deep neural networks. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3): 110. doi: 10.3390-ijgi7030110
Guo Y M, Liu Y, Georgiou T et al., 2018. A review of semantic segmentation using deep neural networks. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 7(2): 87–93. doi: 10.1007-s13735-017-0141-z
He T D, Wang S X, 2021. Multi-spectral remote sensing landcover classification based on deep learning methods. The Journal of Supercomputing, 77(3): 2829–2843. doi: 10.1007-s11227-020-03377-w
Hinton G E, Osindero S, Teh Y W, 2006. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7): 1527–1554. doi: 10.1162-neco.2006.18.7.1527
Hong D F, Gao L R, Yokoya N et al., 2020. More diverse means better: multimodal deep learning meets remote-sensing imagery classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(5): 4340–4354. doi: 10.1109-TGRS.2020.3016820
Kussul N, Lavreniuk M, Skakun S et al., 2017. Deep learning classification of land cover and crop types using remote sensing data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 14(5): 778–782. doi: 10.1109-LGRS.2017.2681128
Li Deren, Zhang Liangpei, Xia Guisong, 2014. Automatic analysis and mining of remote sensing big data. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 43(12): 1211–1216. (in Chinese)
Loveland T R, Reed B C, Brown J F et al., 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DIS cover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6–7): 1303–1330. doi: 10.1080-014311600210191
Ma H J, Liu Y L, Ren Y H et al., 2020. Improved CNN classification method for groups of buildings damaged by earthquake, based on high resolution remote sensing images. Remote Sensing, 12(2): 260. doi: 10.3390-rs12020260
Meng X R, Zhang S Q, Zang S Y, 2018. Remote sensing classification of wetland communities based on convolutional neural networks and high resolution images: a case study of the Honghe wetland. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 38: 1914–1923. doi: 10.13249-j.cnki.sgs.2018.11.019
Noh H, Hong S, Han B, 2015. Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1520–1528. doi: 10.1109-ICCV.2015.178
Pan X R, Gao L R, Zhang B et al., 2018. High-resolution aerial imagery semantic labeling with dense pyramid network. Sensors, 18(11): 3774. doi: 10.3390-s18113774
Pugh S A, Congalton, 2001. Applying spatial autocorrelation analysis to evaluate error in new England forest-cover-type maps derived from landsat thematic mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67(5): 613–620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900100173
Quartulli M, Olaizola I G, 2013. A review of EO image information mining. ISPRS journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 75: 11–28. doi: 10.1016-j.isprsjprs.2012.09.010
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T, 2015. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Cham, 234–241. doi: 10.1007-978-3-319-24574-4_28
Rezaee M, Mahdianpari M, Zhang Y et al., 2018. Deep convolutional neural network for complex wetland classification using optical remote sensing imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(9): 3030–3039. doi: 10.1109-JSTARS.2018.2846178
Shamsolmoali P, Zareapoor M, Wang R et al., 2019. A novel deep structure U-Net for sea-land segmentation in remote sensing images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(9): 3219–3232. doi: 10.1109-JSTARS.2019.2925841
Shelhamer E, Long J, Darrell T, 2016. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(4): 640–651. doi: 10.1109-TPAMI.2016.2572683
Wang Yahui, Chen Erxue, Guo Ying et al., 2020. Deep U-net optimization method for forest type classification with high resolution multispectral remote sensing images. Forest Research, 33(1): 11–18. (in Chinese)
Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R et al., 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4): 600–612. doi: 10.1109-TIP.2003.819861
Weng Q H, 2011. Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing: Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: CRC Press.
Xu X D, Li W, Ran Q et al., 2017. Multisource remote sensing data classification based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 937–949. doi: 10.1109-TGRS.2017.2756851
Yuan Q Q, Shen H F, Li T W et al., 2020. Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: achievements and challenges. Remote Sensing of Environment, 241: 111716. doi: 10.1016-j.rse.2020.111716
Yuan T, Zheng X Q, Hu X et al., 2014. A method for the evaluation of image quality according to the recognition effectiveness of objects in the optical remote sensing image using machine learning algorithm. PloS One, 9(1): e86528. doi: 10.1371-journal.pone.0086528
Zhang L P, Zhang L P, Du B., 2016. Deep learning for remote sensing data: a technical tutorial on the state of the art. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 4(2): 22–40. doi: 10.1109-MGRS.2016.2540798
Zhang X, Liu L Y, Chen X D et al., 2021. GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series landsat imagery. Earth System Science Data, 13(6): 2753–2776. doi: 10.5194-essd-13-2753-2021
Zhang Z X, Liu Q J, Wang Y H, 2018. Road extraction by deep residual u-net. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(5): 749–753. doi: 10.1109-LGRS.2018.2802944
Zhao H S, Shi J P, Qi X J et al., 2017. Pyramid scene parsing network. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6230–6239. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.660
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Foundation item
Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41971352), Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province (No. 2022ZDLSF06-01)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X., Cao, J., Liu, J. et al. Improving the Interpretability and Reliability of Regional Land Cover Classification by U-Net Using Remote Sensing Data. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 32, 979–994 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1315-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1315-z