Abstract
Future or smart community, which mainly refers to the development of community information and communication technology (ICT) platforms or devices, has received considerable attention from urban governments and scholars. However, only a few studies have been conducted to test the actual effects of using these community ICT platforms or devices on the community satisfaction of residents. Therefore, the present study conducts a survey in 40 communities in Nanjing, China and uses a mixed linear regression model to determine the relationship between community ICT usage and community satisfaction. Results indicate that residents with high-level community ICT usage are more satisfied with their community than those with low-level community ICT usage. Moreover, evident differences are observed regarding the influence of new commodity, old commodity and affordable housing communities in Nanjing. These findings are meaningful for the construction and development of future communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball-Rokeach S J, Gibbs J, Jung J Y et al., 2000. The Globalization of Everyday life: Visions and Reality (White Paper 2). Los Angeles: Annenberg School for Communication, Metamorphosis Project. http://www.metamorph.org/vault/globalization.html Cited 31 October 2005.
Bardo J W, Bardo D J, 1983. A re-examination of subjective components of community satisfaction in a british new town. The Journal of Social Psychology, 120(1): 35–43. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1983.9712008
Batty M, 2012. Building a science of cities. Cities, 29(Supp.11): S9–S16. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008
Berry B J L, Okulicz-Kozaryn A, 2011. An urban-rural happiness gradient. Urban Geography, 32(6): 871–883. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.32.6.871
Brereton F, Clinch J P, Ferreira S, 2008. Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecological Economics, 65(2): 386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.008
Chen Hui, Zhen Feng, 2016. Impact of ICT on community satisfaction among elderly: the case of suojin community in Nanjing city. Progress in Geography, 35(9): 1167–1176. (in Chinese)
Dawkins C, Jeon J S, Pendall R, 2015. Transportation access, ental vouchers, and neighborhood satisfaction: evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. Housing Policy Debate, 25(3): 497–530. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2014.986662
Diener E, Ryan K, 2009. Subjective well-being: a general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4): 391–406. doi: 10.1177/008124630903900402
Dutta-Bergman M J, 2005a. Access to the Internet in the context of community participation and community satisfaction. New Media & Society, 7(1): 89–109. doi: 10.1177/14614448050 49146
Dutta-Bergman M J, 2005b. The antecedents of community oriented internet use: community participation and community satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1): 97–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00305.x
Farag S, Weltevreden J, van Rietbergen T et al., 2006. E-shopping in the Netherlands: does geography matter? Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 33(1): 59–74. doi: 10.1068/b31083
Fitz B M, Lyon L, Driskell R, 2016. Why people like where they live: individual- and community-level contributors to community satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 126(3): 1209–1224. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0922-9
Gans H J, 1968. Urbanism and suburbanism as ways of life. In: Pahl R E (ed). Readings in Urban Sociology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 95–118. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-013293-8.50010-5
Garland A N, 2013. Community Satisfaction: the Solution for Rural Communities. Waco: Baylor University.
Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H et al., 2007. Smart Cities- Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna: Center of Regional Science. http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smartcitiesfinalreport.pdf
Gruber K J, Shelton G G, 1987. Assessment of neighborhood satisfaction by residents of three housing types. Social Indicators Research, 19(3): 303–315. doi: 10.1007/BF00300363
Hampton K, 2001. Living the Wired Life in the Wired Suburb: Netville, Glocalization and Civil Society. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Hannscott L, 2016. Individual and contextual socioeconomic status and community satisfaction. Urban Studies, 53(8): 1727–1744. doi: 10.1177/0042098015574811
Heller K, Cook J R, Rasmussen B R et al., 1981. The effects of personal and social ties on satisfaction and perceived strain in changing neighborhoods. Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1): 35–44. doi: 10.1002/1520-6629(198101)9:1<35::AIDJCOP2290090103>3.0.CO;2-J
Hipp J R, 2009. Specifying the determinants of neighborhood satisfaction: a robust assessment in 24 metropolitan areas. Social Forces, 88(1): 395–424. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0239
Katz J E, Aspden P, 1997. A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12): 81–86. doi: 10.1145/265563.265575
Kweon B S, Ellis C D, Leiva P I et al., 2010. Landscape components, land use, and neighborhood satisfaction. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 37(3): 500–517.
Ladewig H, McCann G C, 1980. Community satisfaction: theory and measurement. Rural Sociology, 45(1): 110–131.
Lee S M, 2010. The Association between Neighborhood Environment and Neighborhood Satisfaction: Moderating Effects of Demographics. San Diego: San Diego State University.
Lee S W, Ellis C D, Kweon B S et al., 2008. Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1): 60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.013
Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon K M, Schkade D, 2005. Pursuing happiness: the architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2): 111–131. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2. 111
Matei S, 2001. The Magnifying Glass Effect: Negotiating Individualism and Community on the Internet. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
Matei S, Ball-Rokeach S J, 2001. Real and virtual social ties: connections in the everyday lives of seven ethnic neighborhoods. American Behavioural Scientist, 45(3): 550–564. doi: 10.1177/00027640121957213
Papacharissi Z, Rubin A M, 2000. Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2): 175–196. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2
PEW Research Center. 2000. Tracking Online Life: How Women Use the Internet to Cultivate Relationships with Family and Friends (May). http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Report1.pdf Accessed the 13th of June 2004, at 11.00
Rehdanz K, Maddison D, 2008. Local environmental quality and life-satisfaction in germany. Ecological Economics, 64(4): 787–797. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.016
Rigby K, Vreugdenhil A, 1987. The relationship between generalized community satisfaction and residential social status. The Journal of Social Psychology, 127(4): 381–390. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1987.9713718
Shah D V, Kwak N, Holbert R L, 2001. ‘Connecting’ and ‘disconnecting’ with civic life: patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2): 141–162. doi: 10.1080/105846001750322952
Shin D C, Johnson D M, 1978. Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(1-4): 475–492. doi: 10.1007/BF00352944
Spain D, 1988. The effect of changing household composition on neighborhood satisfaction. Urban Affairs Review, 23(4): 581–600. doi: 10.1177/004208168802300406
United Nations, 2017. New Urban Agenda. New York: United Nations. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English-With-Index-1.pdf Available at: 2018-11-01.
Van den Besselaar P, Beckers D, 1998. Demographics and sociographics of the Digital city. In: Ishida T (ed). Community Computing and Support Systems: Social Interaction in Networked Communities. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 108–124. doi: 10.1007/3-540-49247-X_8
Virnoche M E, 1998. The seamless web and communications equity: the shaping of a community network. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(2): 199–220. doi: 10.1177/ 016224399802300203
Vrbka S J, Combs E R, 1993. Predictors of neighborhood and community satisfactions in rural communities. Housing and Society, 20(1): 41–49. doi: 10.1080/08882746.1993.11430153
Wellman B, Haase A Q, Witte J et al., 2001. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3): 436–455. doi: 10.1177/ 00027640121957286
Xia Yongjiu, Zhu Xigang, 2013. The evaluation of urban forced movers’ community satisfaction: a case study of Nanjing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(8): 918–925. (in Chinese)
Zhang Chun, Chai Yanwei, 2013. Study on neighborhood satisfaction of the urban elderly in Beijing: an approach from fuzzy evaluation. Human Geography, 28(4): 47–52, 147. (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Patricia L Mokhtarian (Professor, Georgia Institute of Technology) and Xinyu Cao (Professor, University of Minnesota) for their comments and suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571146), National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China (No. 51708276) and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (No. 2017M611781).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhen, F., Qin, X., Jiang, Y. et al. Effects of Community Community Communication Technology (ICT) Usage on Community Satisfaction: Case Study in Nanjing, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 29, 834–847 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1072-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1072-9