Skip to main content
Log in

Transnational Economic Connection Analysis Based on Railway Class Accessibility Between China and Russia

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under the background of ‘the Belt and Road’ initiative, the economic cooperation has great potential between China and Russia. The railway accessibility has an important influence on the economic connections of cities along the railway line. This paper studied the Sino-Russian transnational economic connection based on the railway class accessibility along Trans-Siberian railway (the transnational China railway branch line). The results are as following. First, the railway accessibility of the Chinese nodes is stronger than that of the Russian nodes, which in general displays a tendency of space attenuation from China to the Sino-Russian border, then to Russia. Spatially, the railway accessibility within the study area shows a ‘High East, Low West’ and ‘High South, Low North’ spatial pattern. The railway accessibility of the nodes, which are located at the beginning and end of the railway line, is weaker than those nodes located in the middle of the line. Second, the railway accessibility and external economic connection intensity summation of the nodes show a positive relationship along the railway line. The economic connection intensity summation of different nodes presents obvious regional differentiation. Finally, as economic connection network has evolved, the small world effect of Sino-Russian railway economic connection network becomes strong.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson D E, Shyr O F, Fu J, 2010. Does high-speed rail accessibility influence residential property prices? Hedonic estimates from southern Taiwan. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma F, Rietveld P, 1998. The accessibility of European cities: theoretical framework and comparison of approaches. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(3): 499–521. doi: 10.1068/a300499

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell T, Barter P A, Morshidi S, 2002. Kuala lumpur metropolitan area: a globalizing city-region. Cities, 19(5): 357–370. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00036-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Jin F J, Lu Y Q et al., 2018. Development history and accessibility evolution of land transportation network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region over the past century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(10): 1500–1518. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1558-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu Nanchen, Zhang Pingyu, 2018. Transnational urban economic connection based on railway accessibility—taking Sino-Russian K19/K20 class train as an example. Economic Geography, 38(6): 10–18. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Condeço-Melhorado A, Gutiérrez J, García-Palomares J C, 2011. Spatial impacts of road pricing: accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(3): 185–203. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.12.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Teqi, Jin Fengjun, 2008. Spatial interaction and network structure evolvement of cities in terms of China’s rail passenger flows. Chinese Geographical Science, 18(3): 206–213. doi: 10.1007/s11769-008-0206-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmelle E C, Casas I, 2012. Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit-based accessibility patterns in a developing country: the case of Cali, Colombia. Transport Policy, 20: 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov S, Freund C, 2002. Trade flows in the former Soviet Union, 1987 to 1996. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(1): 76–90. doi: 10.1006/jcec.2001.1752

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong S C, Yang Y, Li F J et al., 2018. An evaluation of the economic, social, and ecological risks of China-Mongolia-Russia high-speed railway construction and policy suggestions. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(7): 900–918. doi: 10.1007/s11442-018-1512-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), 2016. Russia in Figures. Moscow: Federal State Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertman S C M, van Eck J R R, 1995. GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9(1): 67–80. doi: 10.1080/02693799508902025

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetz A R, 1992. Air passenger transportation and growth in the U.S. urban system, 1950–1987. Growth and Change, 23(2): 217–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1992.tb00580.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, González R, Gómez G, 1996. The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(4): 227–238. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00033-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, Urbano P, 1996. Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the trans-European road network. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(1): 15–25. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(95)00042-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, 2001. Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(4): 229–242. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, Condeço-Melhorado A, Martín J C, 2010. Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1): 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez J, Condeço-Melhorado A, López E et al., 2011. Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4): 840–850. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.10.011

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen W G, 1959. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2): 73–76. doi: 10. 1080/01944365908978307

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilongjiang Province Bureau of Statistics, Survey Organization of Heilongjiang, 2016. Heilongjiang Statistical Yearbook 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Haibing, Qi Yi, Li Chuanwu, 2018. China’s city high-speed rail (HSR) passenger spatial linkage pattern and its influence factors. Economic Geography, 38(7): 26–33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Jingjuan, Wang Jiaoe, Jin Fengjun et al., 2016. Understanding relationship between accessibility and economic Growth: a case study from China (1990–2010). Chinese Geographical Science, 26(6): 803–816. doi: 10.1007/s11769-016-0831-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Fengjun, 2003. Study on development strategy of shipping centers and transportation networks in the yellow sea rim. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(2): 97–103. doi: 10.1007/s11769-003-0001-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W et al., 2010. China’s regional transport dominance: density, proximity, and accessibility. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 295–309. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0295-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble D, Owens P L, Thompson C, 1982. Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community. Regional Studies, 16(6): 419–432. doi: 10.1080/09595238200185421

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadaroo J, Seetanah B, 2008. The role of transport infrastructure in international tourism development: a gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29(5): 831–840. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans C, Groot W, Warffemius P et al., 2013. Measuring generalised transport costs as an indicator of accessibility changes over time. Transport Policy, 29: 154–159. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.05.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan M P, Murray A T, O’Kelly M E et al., 2003. Recent advances in accessibility research: representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(1): 129–138. doi: 10.1007/s101090300107

    Google Scholar 

  • López E, Monzón A, Ortega E et al., 2009. Assessment of cross-border spillover effects of national transport infrastructure plans: an accessibility approach. Transport Reviews, 29(4): 515–536. doi: 10.1080/01441640802627974

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S M, Shum Y M, 2001. Impacts of the national trunk highway system on accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(1): 39–48. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00040-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Linneker B, Spence N, 1996. Road transport infrastructure and regional economic development: the regional development effects of the M25 London orbital motorway. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2): 77–92. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(96)00001-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Xiaolei, Ma Yanji, 2016. The transportation accessibility and comprehensive economic levels of Chinese cities at prefecture level or above based on GIS. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(4): 8–13. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto H, 2004. International urban systems and air passenger and cargo flows: some calculations. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10(4): 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2004.02.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzón A, Ortega E, López E, 2013. Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas. Cities, 30: 18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2016. China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly M E, 1998. A geographer’s analysis of hub-and-spoke networks. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(3): 171–186. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(98)00010-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond S, Bloom G, Di Duca M et al., 2016. Trans-Siberian Railway. Beijing: China Cartographic Publishing House, 360–374. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russon M G, Vakil F, 1995. Population, convenience and distance decay in a short-haul model of United States air transportation. Journal of Transport Geography, 3(3): 179–185. doi: 10.1016/0966-6923(95)00002-K

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki K, Ohashi T, Ando A, 1997. High-speed rail transit impact on regional systems: does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion? The Annals of Regional Science, 31(1): 77–98. doi: 10.1007/s001680050040

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen G Q, 2004. Reverse-fitting the gravity model to inter-city airline passenger flows by an algebraic simplification. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(3): 219–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.12.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribby C P, Zandbergen P A, 2012. High-resolution spatiotemporal modeling of public transit accessibility. Applied Geography, 34: 345–355. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.008

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs M, Kumagai T G, 1973. Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5): 437–456. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Chengjin, Cheng Jiajia, 2016. Spatial pattern of expressway network accessibility and evolution in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 36(6): 803–812. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Jiechen, Wu Jiayi, Ni Jianhua et al., 2018. Relationship between urban road traffic characteristics and road grade based on a time series clustering model: a case study in Nanjing, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(6): 1048–1060. doi: 10.1007/s11769-018-0982-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich W, Haag G, 1999. An Integrated Model of Transport and Urban Evolution: with An Application to A Metropole of an Emerging Nation. Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-60240-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Liu S X, 2004. Analysis of the impact of the MRT system on accessibility in Singapore using an integrated GIS tool. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2): 89–101. doi: 10. 1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook M A, Brunn S D, 2005. Hierarchies, regions and legacies: european cities and global commercial passenger air travel. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 13(2): 203–220. doi: 10.1080/14782800500212459

    Google Scholar 

  • ФЕДЕРАЛЬНАЯ СЛУЖБА ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ СТАТИС ТИКИ (Росстат) (Federal Office for State Statistics), 2016. РЕГИОНЫ РОССИИ Основные характеристики субъектов Российской Федерации. Москва: Федеральная служба госу дарственной статистики.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pingyu Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Science and Technology Basic Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2017FY101303-1), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571152, 41771179), the Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS (No. ZDRW-ZS-2017-4-3-4, ZDBS-SSW-SQC)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, N., Zhang, P. & Li, H. Transnational Economic Connection Analysis Based on Railway Class Accessibility Between China and Russia. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 29, 872–886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1064-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-019-1064-9

Keywords

Navigation