Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-scale Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Rural Poverty: A Case Study in the Liupan Mountain Region, Gansu Province, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The important role of spatial scale in exploring the geography of poverty as well as its policy implications has been noticed but with limited knowledge. To improve such limited understanding, we mainly investigated the spatial patterns and influencing factors of rural poverty (indicated by poor population and poverty incidence) at three different administrative levels in the Liupan Mountain Region, one of the fourteen poorest regions in China. Our results show that from a global perspective, poor areas are clustered significantly at the county-, township-, and village-level, and more greatly at a lower level. Locally, there is spatial mismatch among poverty hotspots detected not only by the same indicator at different levels but also by different indicators at the same level. A scale effect can be found in the influencing factors of rural poverty. That is, the number of significant factors increases, but the degree of their association with poverty incidence decreases at a lower level. Such scale effect indicates that poverty incidence at lower levels may be affected by more complex factors, including not only the new local ones but also the already appeared non-local ones at higher levels. However, the natural conditions tend to play a scale-independent role to poverty incidence. In response to such scale-dependent patterns and factors, anti-poverty policies can be 1) a multilevel monitoring system to reduce incomplete or even misleading single-level information and understanding; 2) the village-based targeting strategy to increase the targeting efficiency and alleviate the mentioned spatial mismatch; 3) more flexible strategies responding to the local impoverishing factors, and 4) different task emphasises for multilevel policymakers to achieve the common goal of poverty reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alkire S, Foster J, 2011. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8): 476–487. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwang J, Siegel P B, Jorgensen S L, 2001. Vulnerability: a view from different disciplines. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No.0115. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amara M, Ayadi M, 2013. The local geographies of welfare in Tunisia: does neighbourhood matter? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1): 90–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00863.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasinghe U, Samad M, Anputhas M, 2005. Spatial clustering of rural poverty and food insecurity in Sri Lanka. Food Policy, 30(5–6): 493–509. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annim S K, Mariwah S, Sebu J, 2012. Spatial inequality and household poverty in Ghana. Economic Systems, 36(4): 487–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2012.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2): 93–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, 2002. Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27(3): 247–267. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5150(02)00077-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, 2003. GeoDaTM 0.9 User’s Guide. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho Y, 2010. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. In: Fischer M M, Getis A (eds). Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03647-7_5

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson T, Chamberlin J, Rhinehart I, 2005. An investigation of the spatial determinants of the local prevalence of poverty in rural Malawi. Food Policy, 30(5–6): 532–550. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird K, Hulme D, Moore K et al., 2002. Chronic poverty and remote rural areas. CPRC Working Paper No.13. London: Chronic Poverty Research Centre, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird K, Shepherd A, 2003. Livelihoods and chronic poverty in semi-arid zimbabwe. World Development, 31(3): 591–610. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00220-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird K, Higgins K, Harris D, 2010. Spatial poverty traps: an overview. CPRC Working Paper 161. London: Chronic Poverty Research Centre, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom D E, Canning D, Sevilla J, 2003. Geography and poverty traps. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(4): 355–378. doi: 10.1023/A:1026294316581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke W J, Jayne T S, 2010. Spatial disadvantages or spatial poverty traps: household evidence from rural Kenya. CPRC Working Paper 167. London: Chronic Poverty Research Centre, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter P M R, Barrett C B, 2006. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2): 178–199. doi: 10.1080/00220380500405261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell V, 2001. Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 52(10): 1501–1516. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00259-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis K J, Voss P R, Long D D, 2012. Spatial variation in poverty- generating processes: child poverty in the United States. Social Science Research, 41(1): 146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, 2016. China meteorological data. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences (RESDC).

  • Dercon S, 2001. Assessing vulnerability to poverty. Oxford: Oxford University, 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donohue C, Biggs E, 2015. Monitoring socio-environmental change for sustainable development: developing a Multidimensional Livelihoods Index (MLI). Applied Geography, 62: 391–403. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungan J L, Perry J N, Dale M R T et al., 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography, 25(5): 626–640. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Board of Gansu Development Yearbook, 2014a. Gansu Development Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

  • Elbers C, Lanjouw J O, Lanjouw P, 2003. Micro-level estimation of poverty and inequality. Econometrica, 71(1): 355–364. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbers C, Fujii T, Lanjouw P et al., 2007. Poverty alleviation through geographic targeting: how much does disaggregation help? Journal of Development Economics, 83(1): 198–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epprecht M, Müller D, Minot N, 2011. How remote are Vietnam’s ethnic minorities? An analysis of spatial patterns of poverty and inequality. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(2): 349–368. doi: 10.1007/s00168–009-0330–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erenstein O, Hellin J, Chandna P, 2010. Poverty mapping based on livelihood assets: a meso-level application in the Indo- Gangetic Plains, India. Applied Geography, 30(1): 112–125. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow A, Larrea C, Hyman G et al., 2005. Exploring the spatial variation of food poverty in Ecuador. Food Policy, 30(5–6): 510–531. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis P, James R, 2003. Balancing rural poverty reduction and citizen participation: the contradictions of Uganda’s decentralization program. World Development, 31(2): 325–337. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00190-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansu Rural Yearbook Editorial Board, 2014b. Gansu Rural Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

  • Geospatial Data Cloud, 2016. GDEMDEM 30M. Beijing: Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

  • Grant U, Hulme D, Moore K et al., 2004. The chronic poverty report 2004-05. Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre, 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel J, Lanjouw J O, Lanjouw P et al., 2000. Combining census and survey data to trace the spatial dimensions of poverty: a case study of Ecuador. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1): 147–165. doi: 10.1093/wber/14.1.147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt J B, 2007. The topography of poverty in the United States: a spatial analysis using county-level data from the Community Health Status Indicators project. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(4): A111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran M, Stein A, Zurita-Milla R, 2014. Investigating rural poverty and marginality in Burkina Faso using remote sensingbased products. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26: 322–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalan J, Ravallion M, 1997. Spatial poverty traps? Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalan J, Ravallion M, 2002. Geographic poverty traps? A micro model of consumption growth in rural China. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(4): 329–346. doi: 10.1002/jae.645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kam S P, Hossain M, Bose M L et al., 2005. Spatial patterns of rural poverty and their relationship with welfare-influencing factors in Bangladesh. Food Policy, 30(5–6): 551–567. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim R, Mohanty S K, Subramanian S V, 2016. Multilevel geographies of poverty in India. World Development, 87: 349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Fortin M J, 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio, 80(2): 107–138. doi: 10.1007/bf00048036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Yurui, Cao Zhi, Zheng Xiaoyu et al., 2016. Regional and sustainable approach for Target-Poverty Alleviation and development of China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 31(3): 279–288. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Yansui, Zhou Yang, Liu Jilai, 2016. Regional differentiation characteristics of rural poverty and targeted poverty alleviation strategy in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 31(3): 269–278. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Yansui, Li Jintao, 2017. Geographic detection and optimizing decision of the differentiation mechanism of rural poverty in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(1): 161–173. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y H, Xu Y, 2016. A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis. Applied Geography, 73: 62–76. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Qing, Fan Xinsheng, Gao Genghe et al., 2016. Spatial distribution of poverty village and influencing factors in Qinba Mountains. Economic Geography, 36(4): 126–132. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Minot N, 2000. Generating disaggregated poverty maps: an application to Vietnam. World Development, 28(2): 319–331. doi: 10.1016/s0305-750x(99)00126-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minot N, Baulch B, 2005. Spatial patterns of poverty in Vietnam and their implications for policy. Food Policy, 30(5–6): 461–475. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minot N, Baulch B, Epprecht M, 2006. Poverty and Inequality in Vietnam: Spatial Patterns and Geographic Determinants. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A, 2005. The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spatial Measurements & Statistics. Redlands: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran P A P, 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 10(2): 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2014. China County Statistical Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

  • Oden N L, 1984. Assessing the significance of a spatial correlogram. Geographical Analysis, 16(1): 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1984.tb00796.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okwi P O, Ndeng’e G, Kristjanson P et al., 2007. Spatial determinants of poverty in rural Kenya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(43): 16769–16774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611107104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivia S, Gibson J, Rozelle S et al., 2011. Mapping poverty in rural China: how much does the environment matter? Environment and Development Economics, 16(2): 129–153. doi: 10.1017/s1355770x10000513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer-Jones R, Sen K, 2006. It is where you are that matters: the spatial determinants of rural poverty in India. Agricultural Economics, 34(3): 229–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00121.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park A, Wang S G, Wu G B, 2002. Regional poverty targeting in China. Journal of Public Economics, 86(1): 123–153. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00108-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park A, Wang S G, 2010. Community-based development and poverty alleviation: an evaluation of China’s poor village investment program. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10): 790–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge M D, Rickman D S, 2008. Place-based policy and rural poverty: insights from the urban spatial mismatch literature. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(1): 131–156. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsm005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijanowski B C, Iverson L R, Drew C A et al., 2010. Addressing the interplay of poverty and the ecology of landscapes: a Grand Challenge Topic for landscape ecologists? Landscape Ecology, 25(1): 5–16. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9415-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion M, Wodon Q, 1999. Poor areas, or only poor people? Journal of Regional Science, 39(4): 689–711. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha A, Goetzb S J, 2007. Social and political forces as determinants of poverty: a spatial analysis. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(4): 650–671. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Council of the People’s Republic of China, 2011. The Outline for Development-oriented poverty reduction for China’s rural areas (2011–2020). http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/ 2011/content_2020905.htm. 2016-11-26. (in Chinese)

  • Sunderlin W D, Dewi S, Puntodewo A et al., 2008. Why forests are important for global poverty alleviation: a spatial explanation. Ecology and Society, 13(2): 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss P R, Long D D, Hammer R B et al., 2006. County child poverty rates in the US: a spatial regression approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 25(4): 369–391. doi: 10.1007/s11113-006-9007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Kaczan D, 2014. Challenging Hydrological Panaceas: water poverty governance accounting for spatial scale in the Niger River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 519: 2501–2514. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, 2000. World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

  • World Bank, 2009. World development report 2009: reshaping economic geography. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

  • Wu J G, 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19(2): 125–138. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Lizong, 2012. Basic geographic data set of Gansu at the scale of 1?100 000. Beijing: National Science & Technology Infrastructure of China, National Earth System Science Data Sharing Infrastructure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Yueqing, Li Shuangcheng, Cai Yunlong, 2006. Spatial simulation using GIS and artificial neural network for regional poverty—A case study of Maotiaohe Watershed, Guizhou Province. Progress in Geography, 25(3): 79–85. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yongli, Huang Zuhui, 2008. Characteristics and trends of the new generation migrants: survey and analysis on 10 villages in Gansu Province. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (2): 80–87. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Zhenbang Ma & Xingpeng Chen

  2. Research Institute for Circular Economy in Western China, College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Zhenbang Ma & Xingpeng Chen

  3. Belle W. Baruch Institute of coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, Georgetown, South Carolina, 29442, USA

    Huan Chen

Authors
  1. Zhenbang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingpeng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenbang Ma.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41401204, 41471462), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. lzujbky-2013-128)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Chen, X. & Chen, H. Multi-scale Spatial Patterns and Influencing Factors of Rural Poverty: A Case Study in the Liupan Mountain Region, Gansu Province, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 28, 296–312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0943-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0943-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation