Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 100–110 | Cite as

Urban Plant Diversity in Relation to Land Use Types in Built-up Areas of Beijing

  • Peipei Guo
  • Yuebo Su
  • Wuxing Wan
  • Weiwei Liu
  • Hongxing Zhang
  • Xu Sun
  • Zhiyun Ouyang
  • Xiaoke Wang
Article

Abstract

Urban plants provide various ecosystem services and biodiversity for human well-being. It is necessary to examine the plant species and functional traits composition and the influencing factors. In this study, a field survey was conducted using the tessellation-randomized plot method to assess the plant species and functional traits variability in greenspaces across eight land use types (LUTs) in the built-up areas of Beijing, China. Results showed that the woody plants in the built-up areas of Beijing comprised 85 non-native species (57%), 21 pollen-allergenic species (14%), and 99 resistant species (67%). Residential areas, community parks and institutional areas had higher woody plant species richness than other LUTs. Native and extralimital native species were more widespread than exotic species. Proportions of species with resistances were low except for cold- and drought-resistance; consequently, a high intensity of management and maintenance is essential for survival of plants in this urban area. Caution should be exerted in selecting plant species with resistance to harsh conditions in different LUTs. Housing prices, distances from the urban center, years since the establishment of LUTs and greening rate were strongly correlated with the plant functional traits and species diversity. Urban forest managers should consider plant functional traits and LUT-specific strategies to maximize both forest and human health.

Keywords

functional trait native species extralimital native exotic resistant species Beijing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts R, 1995. The advantages of being evergreen. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10(10): 402–407. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89156-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti M, Marzluff J M, Shulenberger E et al., 2003. Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystem. Bioscience, 53(12): 1169–1179. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson M F J, Handel S N, La Puma I P et al., 2015. Urbanization promotes non–native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region. Urban Ecosystems, 18(1): 31–45. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0382-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassuk N, Curtis D F, Marranca B Z et al., 2009. Recommended Urban Trees: Site Assessment and Tree Selection for Stress Tolerance. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York: Urban Horticulture Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry, 2006. Compilation of Census Data of Urban Landscaping in Beijing 2005. Beijing: Beijing Publishing Group. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2014. Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2014. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Berland A, 2012. Long–term urbanization effects on tree canopy cover along an urban–rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 15(3): 721–738. doi: 10.1007/s11252-012-0224-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourne K S, Conway T M, 2014. The influence of land use type and municipal context on urban tree species diversity. Urban Ecosystems, 17(1): 329–348. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0317-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Youmin, 2003. Landscape Dendrology. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Compilation Committee of the Flora of China, 1959–2004. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Crawley M J, Brown S L, Heard M S et al., 1999. Invasion–resistance in experimental grassland communities: species richness or species identity? Ecology Letters, 2(3): 140–148. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00056.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Antonio C, Meyerson L A, 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restoration Ecology, 10(4): 703–713. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X. 2002.01051.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dıaz S, Cabido M, 2001. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16(11): 646–655. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01) 02283-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaffin S R, Rosenzweig C, Kong A Y Y, 2012. Adapting to climate change through urban green infrastructure. Nature Climate Change, 2(10): 704. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1685Google Scholar
  15. Grimm N B, Faeth S H, Golubiewski N E et al., 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864): 756–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1150195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanski I, Von Hertzenb L, Fyhrquist N et al., 2012. Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(21): 8334–8339. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205624109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He Shiyuan, Xing Qihua, Yin Zutang et al., 1993. Beijing Flora. 2nd ed. Beijing: Beijing Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Helden A J, Stamp G C, Leather S R, 2012. Urban biodiversity: comparison of insect assemblages on native and non–native trees. Urban Ecosystems, 15(3): 611–624. doi: 10.1007/s 11252-012-0231-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W X et al., 2003. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(15): 8788–8792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1537557100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Investigational Team on Airborne and Allergenic Pollen Grains in China, 1991. An Investigation on Airborne and Allergenic Pollen Grains in China. Beijing: China People Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Jim C Y, Zhang H, 2015. Effect of habitat traits on tree structure and growth in private gardens. Landscape Ecology, 30(7): 1207–1223. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0179-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson A L, Swan C M, 2014. Drivers of vegetation species diversity and composition in urban ecosystems. In: McCleery R A, Moorman C E, Peterson M N (eds). Urban Wildlife Conservation: Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Springer, 75–90.Google Scholar
  23. Jooss R, Geissler–Strobel S, Trautner J et al., 2009. ‘Conservation responsibilities’ of municipalities for target species: Prioritizing conservation by assigning responsibilities to municipalities in Baden–Wuerttemberg, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(3-4): 218–228. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009. 07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knapp S, Kühn I, Schweiger O et al., 2008. Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecology Letters, 11(10): 1054–1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01217.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knapp S, Kühn I, Bakker J P et al., 2009. How species traits and affinity to urban land use control large–scale species frequency. Diversity and Distributions, 15(3): 533–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00561.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knapp S, Kühn I, 2012. Origin matters: widely distributed native and non–native species benefit from different functional traits. Ecology Letters, 15(7): 696–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2012.01787.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kowarik I, 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution, 159(8-9): 1974–1983. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li W F, Ouyang Z Y, Meng X S et al., 2006. Plant species composition in relation to green cover configuration and function of urban parks in Beijing, China. Ecological Research, 21(2): 221–237. doi: 10.1007/s11284-005-0110-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKinney M L, 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127(3): 247–260. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller R H, Miller R W, 1991. Planting survival of selected street tree taxa. Journal of Arboriculture, 17(7): 185–191.Google Scholar
  31. Muthulingam U, Thangavel S, 2012. Density, diversity and richness of woody plants in urban green spaces: a case study in Chennai metropolitan city. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(4): 450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouyang Ziluo, Ji Wenli, Yang Mei, 2015. Plant diversity of urban green spaces in Xi’an. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 30(2): 257–261, 292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015. 02.45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  33. Pickett S T A, Cadenasso M L, Grove J M et al., 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32: 127–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ter Braak C J F, Smilauer P, 2002. Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (ver. 4. 5). Ithaca, New York: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
  35. Wang H F, MacGregor–Fors I, López–Pujol J, 2012. Warmtemperate, immense, and sprawling: plant diversity drivers in urban Beijing, China. Plant Ecology, 213(6): 967–992. doi: 10.1007/s11258-012-0058-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang H F, Qureshi S, Knapp S et al., 2015. A basic assessment of residential plant diversity and its ecosystem services and disservices in Beijing, China. Applied Geography, 64: 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams N S G, Hahs A K, Vesk P A, 2015. Urbanisation, plant traits and the composition of urban floras. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 17(1): 78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2014.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xin Jianan, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua et al., 2007. Allergenic pollen plants and their influential factors in urban areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(9): 3820–3827. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang H, Jim C Y, 2014. Contributions of landscape trees in public housing estates to urban biodiversity in Hong Kong. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(2): 272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao J J, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H et al., 2010a. Plant species composition in green spaces within the built–up areas of Beijing, China. Plant Ecology, 209(2): 189–204. doi: 10.1007/s11258-009-9675-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao Juanjuan, Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua et al., 2010b. Species composition of alien plants in the built–up area of Beijing. Biodiversity Science, 18(1): 19–28. (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhao M, Escobedo F J, Wang R J et al., 2013. Woody vegetation composition and structure in peri–urban Chongming Island, China. Environmental Management, 51(5): 999–1011. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0025-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peipei Guo
    • 1
  • Yuebo Su
    • 1
  • Wuxing Wan
    • 2
  • Weiwei Liu
    • 1
  • Hongxing Zhang
    • 3
  • Xu Sun
    • 3
  • Zhiyun Ouyang
    • 1
  • Xiaoke Wang
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Life ScienceHebei Normal UniversityShijiazhuangChina
  3. 3.Beijing Urban Ecosystem Research Station, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations