Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the spatial interactions among multiple ecosystem services is crucial for ecosystem services management. Ecosystem services, including crop production, freshwater supply, aquatic production, net primary production, soil conservation, water conservation, flood regulation, forest recreation, were measured at 1-km grid scale covering the Taihu Lake Basin (TLB) of China. Our objective is to get a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distributions, trade-offs, synergies of multiple ecosystem services across the TLB. Our results found that: 1) majority of ecosystem services were clustered in space and had a similar spatial distribution pattern with the geographical resource endowment. Most of the landscape contributed a high supply of no services, one or two, and a low supply of three to seven services. 2) There were high correlation between forest recreation and freshwater supply and regulating services. Aquatic production had low correlation with other services. 3) The changes of provisioning services led to trade-offs between regulating services and cultural services in the TLB, while synergies mainly occurred among the provisioning service. 4) The spatial relationships of multiple services are consistent at 1-km spatial scale, counties and provinces. This research could help integrate multiple ecosystem services across scales and serve as a reference for decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APBS (Anhui Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Anhui Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

  • Bateman I J, Harwood A R, Mace G M et al., 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 341(6141): 45–50. doi: 10. 1126/science.1234379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12): 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387. x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauman K A, Daily G C, Duarte T K et al., 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1): 67–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S R, Mooney H A, Agard J et al., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5): 1305–1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFries R S, Foley J A, Asner G P, 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5): 249–257. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derissen S, Latacz-Lohmann U, 2013. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, 6: 12–15. doi: 10. 1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan Yulong, Hu Nan, Ding Shengyan et al., 2016. Progress in terrestrial ecosystem services and biodiversity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(15): 4583–4593. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Field C B, Randerson J T, Malmström C M, 1995. Global net primary production: combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 51(1): 74–88. doi: 10.1016/ 0034-4257(94)00066-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Nachtergaele F, Prieler S et al., 2008. Global agro-ecological zones assessment for agriculture (GAEZ 2008). Rome, Italy: IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, De Fries R, Asner G P et al., 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574. doi: 10. 1126/science.1111772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Gulinck H, 1994. Land evaluation in an area of severe erosion: the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation and Development, 5(1): 33–40. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3400050105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Wang S, Su C H et al., 2013. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(1): 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein J H, Caldarone G, Duarte T K et al., 2012. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19): 7565–7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120104 0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo L, 2007. Ecology: doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science, 317(5842): 1166–1166. doi: 10.1126/ science.317.5842. 1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M et al., 2012. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17(3): 22. doi: 10.5751/es-04853-170322

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Y Y, Chen Q K, Chen X et al., 2014. Occurrence and transfer of a cyanobacterial neurotoxin β-methylamino-L-alanine within the aquatic food webs of Gonghu Bay (Lake Taihu, China) to evaluate the potential human health risk. Science of the Total Environment, 468-469: 457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Yan, Huang Jingfeng, Peng Dailiang, 2009. A new quantitative model of ecological compensation based on ecosystem capital in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 10(4): 301–305. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JPBS (Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

  • Legendre P, Legendre L, 1998. Numerical Ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Ren Z Y, Zhou Z X, 2006. Ecosystem services and their values: a case study in the Qinba mountains of China. Ecological Research, 21(4): 597–604. doi: 10.1007/s11284-006-0148-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhou Z X, 2016. Natural and human impacts on ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(7): 6803–6815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5867-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z F, Luo C, Xi Q et al., 2015. Assessment of the AnnAGNPS model in simulating runoff and nutrients in a typical small watershed in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Catena, 133: 349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G L, Zhang L C, Zhang Q et al., 2015. The response of grain production to changes in quantity and quality of cropland in Yangtze River Delta, China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95(3): 480–489. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Island Press.

  • Piao S L, Fang J Y, Ciais P et al., 2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature, 458(7241): 1009–1013. doi: 10.1038/nature07944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E et al., 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33: 118–129. doi: 10.1016/j. landusepol.2012.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B et al., 1993. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 811–841. doi: 10.1029/93gb02725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu J X, Turner M G, 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(29): 12149–12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539 110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel T F, Diniz-Filho J A F, Bini L M, 2010. SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33(1): 46–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao Enming, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun, 2014. Assessment of flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs in china. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(8): 1356–1365. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M, 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11): 5242–5247. doi: 10. 1073/pnas.0907284107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts T H, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R et al., 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(34): 12579–12582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405147101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M et al., 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 11(1): 28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounsevell M D A, Annetts J E, Audsley E et al., 2003. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95(2–3): 465–479. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00217-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Cassman K G, 2013. Agricultural innovation to protect the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(21): 8345–8348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208054110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SBS (Shanghai Bureau of Statistic), 2011. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

  • State Council of China, 2014. National New-Type Urbanization Plan 2014-2020. Beijing, China: People's Publishing House. (in Chinese)

  • Su C H, Fu B J, He C S et al., 2012a. Variation of ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe Watershed of China. Acta Oecologica, 44: 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j. actao.2011.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su C H, Fu B J, Wei Y P et al., 2012b. Ecosystem management based on ecosystem services and human activities: a case study in the Yanhe watershed. Sustainability Science, 7(1): 17–32. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0145-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner K G, Odgaard M V, Bøcher P K et al., 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGS, 2004. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 1 Arc Second scene SRTM_u03_n008e004, Unfilled Unfinished 2.0, Global Land Cover Facility. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.

  • Vos W, Meekes H, 1999. Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1–3): 3–14. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046 (99)00043-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G X, Zhang L M, Zhuang Q L et al., 2016. Quantification of the soil organic carbon balance in the Tai-Lake paddy soils of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 155: 95–106. doi: 10. 1016/j.still.2015.08.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Liyan, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun et al., 2017. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: an example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(3): 146–154. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen Yuanguang, Liu Shirong, 1995. Quantitative analysis of the characteristics of rainfall interception of main forest ecosystems in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 31(4): 289–298. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X B, Yang G S, Tan Y et al., 2016. Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. Science of the Total Environment, 554-555: 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G F, Ge Y, Xue H et al., 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136: 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y X, Xu Y P, Chen Y, 2009. Relationship between flood/drought disasters and ENSO from 1857 to 2003 in the Taihu Lake basin, China. Quaternary International, 208(1–2): 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu T, Zhang Y, Hu X N et al., 2012. Distribution and bioaccumulation of heavy metals in aquatic organisms of different trophic levels and potential health risk assessment from Taihu lake, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 81: 55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv. 2012.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M S, Running S W, 2010. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 Through 2009. Science, 329(5994): 940–943. doi: 10.1126/science. 1192666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZPBS (Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics), 2011. Zhejiang Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China: China Statistic Press. (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454003, China

    Xuning Qiao & Yangyang Gu

  2. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Nanjing, 210042, China

    Yangyang Gu & Changxin Zou

  3. Key Laboratory of Watershed Geographic Sciences, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Yangyang Gu & Juhua Luo

  4. Department of Geography & Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    Lei Wang

  5. Guizhou Institue of Environmental Sciences Research and Design, Guiyang, 550018, China

    Xianfeng Huang

Authors
  1. Xuning Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yangyang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Changxin Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juhua Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xianfeng Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yangyang Gu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 14BJY021), National Natural Science Foundation of China (40901296, U1404402), Youth backbone teachers of Henan province’s universities (No. 2014GGJS-044)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, X., Gu, Y., Zou, C. et al. Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 28, 86–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-0933-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation