Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 456–470 | Cite as

Industrial agglomeration externalities, city size, and regional economic development: Empirical research based on dynamic panel data of 283 cities and GMM method

  • Huayou ZhuEmail author
  • Zejuan Dai
  • Ziran Jiang
Article

Abstract

Local governments have long been ardently pursuing the industrial specialization effect (MAR externalities) and industrial diversification effect (Jacobs externalities). Such a pursuit has resulted in severe distortion of resource allocation and negative effect on sustainability of local economic development. Regarding the effect from both MAR and Jacobs externalities on local economic development existing literature records notable disputes. Therefore, for local economic development, one important issue is which externality (MAR or Jacobs) can better bring the effect into play. By studying a panel data of 283 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2012 and applying dynamic plane data GMM method, this paper conducted a regression analysis of the relationship among industrial agglomeration externalities, city size, and regional economic development. The result indicates that with regard to the whole nation, MAR externalities are conducive to regional economy development whereas Jacobs externalities will, to an extent, restrain regional economic development. As regards eastern, middle, and western regions, MAR externalities are conducive only to the economic development of the eastern region; their effects on middle and western regions are insignificant. Moreover, the interaction item between MAR externalities and city size has a significant negative synergistic effect on national economic development and a certain acceleration effect on eastern region as well as a strong negative synergistic effect on the middle region and an insignificant effect on the western region. The interaction item between Jacobs externalities and city size has a positive synergistic effect on only the middle region and has an insignificant synergistic effect on both eastern and western regions. Capital stock and labor input have significant accelerating effects on GDP growth per capita of Chinese cities, whereas material capital and labor input remain primary driving forces for Chinese local economic development. Furthermore, human capital contributes to accelerating urban economic development, whereas government intervention restrains urban economic development.

Keywords

MAR externalities Jacobs externalities city size regional economic development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arellano M, Bond S, 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equation. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2): 277–297. doi: 10.2307/2297968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batisse C, 2002. Dynamic externalities and local growth: a panel data analysis applied to Chinese provinces. China Economic Review, 13(2): 231–251. doi: 10.1016/s1043-951x(02)00068-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng Zhonghua, Yu Binbin, 2014. Industrial agglomeration and regional wage gap: spatial econometric analysis based on Chinese urban data. Modern Economic Science, 36(6): 86–94. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. Ellison G, Glaeser E L, 1997. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 889–927. doi: 10.3386/w4840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaeser E L, Hedi K, Jose A S et al., 1992. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1126–1152. doi: 10.3386/w3787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan Jianyong, Feng Meng, Li Fangwen, 2014. Industrial agglomeration and total factor productivity of enterprises. Journal of World Economics, (5): 51–73. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Feldman M P, Audretsch D B, 1999. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43(2): 409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forni M, Paba S, 2002. Spillovers and the growth of local industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2): 151–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson J V, 1986. Efficiency of resource usage and city size. Journal of Urban economics, 19(1): 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henderson J V, Kuncoro A, Turner M, 1995. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1067–1090. doi: 10.3386/w41781995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoover E M, 1937. Location Theory and the Shoe Leather Industries. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs J, 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Marshall A, 1920. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Mukkala K, 2004. Agglomeration economies in the Finish manufacturing sector. Applied Economics, 36(21): 2419–2427. doi: 10.1080/0003684042000287655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin P, Mayer T, Mayneris F, 2008. Spatial concentration and firm-level productivity in France. CEPR Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  16. National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2004–2013. China Statistical Yearbook 2003–2012. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Peng Xiang, Jiang Chuanhai, 2011. Industrial agglomeration, technological spillovers and regional innovation: evidences from China. China Economic Quarterly, 10(3): 913–934. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Su Hongjian, Zhao Jian, 2011. Sectoral specialization, functional specialization and growth in cities: evidences from panel data on China’s prefecture-level city. China Industrial Economics, (4): 25–34. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Sun Xiaohua, Zhou Linlin, 2013. Diversification, specialization, city size and economic growth: an empirical analysis based on panel data of prefecture-level cities of China. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 27(2): 71–78. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Wang Chunhui, Zhao Wei, 2014. Agglomeration externalities and regional economic performance: a theoretical model based on regional opening. Journal of International Trade Issues, (4): 67–77. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Young A, 2000. Gold into base metals: productivity growth in the People’s Republic of China during the reform period. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7856.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu Binbin, Jin Gang, 2014. Space spillovers of Chinese urban structure adjustment and pattern selection. China Industrial Economics, (2): 31–44. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  23. Zhang Zhiqiang, 2014. Dynamic externality, industry heterogeneity and synchronized regional industry development. Review of Industrial Economics, 13(3): 116–143. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Zhang Jun, Wu Guiying, Zhang Jipeng, 2004. The estimation of China’s provincial capital stock: 1952–2000. Journal of Economic Research, (10): 35–43. (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economic and ManagementZhejiang Normal UniversityJinhuaChina

Personalised recommendations