Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 239–247 | Cite as

Effects of wetland vegetation on soil microbial composition: A case study in Tumen River Basin, Northeast China

  • Lei Qin
  • Ming Jiang
  • Wei Tian
  • Jian Zhang
  • Weihong ZhuEmail author
Article

Abstract

Hydrology plays a dominant role in wetland plant distribution and microbial composition, but few studies explicitly attempted to relate the linkage between wetland vegetation and microbial community. The present study consisted of five wetland plant communities along three adjacent flood gradients zones (zone 1 dominated by Carex appendiculat, zone 2 dominated by Eleocharis ovate, and zone 3 dominated by Phragmites australis/Bidens pilosa/Calamagrostis angustifolia, which formed separate, monoculture patches). Gram negative and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) are more abundant in the site with short flooding period (zone 3) than in the site with long flooding period (zone 1), and they are also different in the P. australis, B. spilosa and C. angustifolia of zone 3. Principle Component Analysis (PCA) showed that the flooding period could explain 92.4% of variance in microbial composition. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) showed that available nitrogen (AN), total nitrogen (TN) and soil organic matter (SOM) could explain the 79.5% of variance in microbial composition among E. ovata, P. australis, B. pilosa and C. angustifolia. Results demonstrated that flooding period was the main factor in driving the microbial composition and plant-derived resources could influence soil microbial composition in the seasonally flooded zones.

Keywords

plant soil feedback redundancy analysis phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) soil property flooding period 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Zheng Junqiang of Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for the help on the experiment. We also thank Prof. Marinus L. Otte of North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA, for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Bach L H, Grytnes J A, Halvorsen R et al., 2010. Tree influence on soil microbial community structure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(11): 1934–1943. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai Junhong. 2003. Biogeochemical processes of nitrogen in marsh soils from Xianghai wetland, China. Changchun, China: PhD Thesis, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Bai J H, Yang H O, Deng W et al., 2005. Spatial distribution characteristics of organic matter and total nitrogen of marsh soils in river marginal wetlands. Geoderma, 124(1–2): 181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.gE.ovataderma.2004.04.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasooriya W K, Denef K, Peters J et al., 2008. Vegetation composition and soil microbial community structural changes along a wetland hydrological gradient. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 12(1): 277–291. doi: 10.5194/hess-12-277-2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardgett R D, Shine A, 1999. Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31(2): 317–321. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00121-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruland G L, Richardson C J, 2004. Wetland soils: Hydrologic gradients and topsoil additions affect soil properties of virginiacerated wetlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68(6): 2069–2077. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colin W B, Shinichi A, Francisco C et al., 2015. Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial community assembly during plant growth. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 85:1701–82. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.006Google Scholar
  8. Djukic I, Zehetner F, Mentler A et al., 2010. Microbial community composition and activity in different Alpine vegetation zones. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(2): 155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frostegard A, Tunlid A, Baath E, 1991. Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic content. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 14(3): 151–163. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(91)90018-LCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutknecht J L M, Goodman R M, Balser T C, 2006. Linking soilprocesses and microbial ecology in freshwater wetland ecosystems. Plant Soil, 289(1–2): 17–34. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9105-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han X M, Wang R Q, Liu J et al., 2007. Effects of vegetation type on soil microbial community structure and catabolic diversity assessed by polyphasic methods in North China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(10): 1228–1234. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60200-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houlahan J E, Keddy P A, Makkay K et al., 2006. The effects of adjacent land use on wetland species richness and community composition. Wetlands, 26(1): 79–96. doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2006)[97:JE.OVATAALU]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingham E R, Wilson M V, 1999. The mycorrhizal colonization of six wetland plant species at sites differing in land use history. Mycorrhiza, 9(4): 233–235. doi: 10.1007/s005720050272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaatinen K, Fritze H, Laine J et al., 2007. Effects of short- and long-term water-level drawdown on the populations and activity of aerobic decomposers in a boreal peatland. Global Change Biology, 13(2): 491–510. doi: 10.111/j.1365-2486.2006.01312.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaatinen K, Tuittila E S, Laine J et al., 2005. Methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) in a Finnish raised mire complex: Effects of site fertility and drainage. Microbial Ecology, 50(3): 429–439. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0219-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson M B, Armstrong W, 1999. Formation of aerenchyma and the processes of plant ventilation in relation to soil flooding and submergence. Plant Biology, 1(3): 274–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00253.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James F D, Nicolas C, Hélène F et al., 2004. Sensing and signalling during plant flooding. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 42(4): 273–282. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jing J Y, Martijn B T, Van der Putten W H, 2015. Interspecific competition of early successional plant species in ex-arable fields as influenced by plant–soil feedback. Basic and Applied and Ecology, 16(2): 112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2015.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kardol P, Bezemer T M, Van der Putten W H, 2006. Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession. Ecology Letters, 9(9): 1080–1088. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00953.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kardol P, De Deyn G B, Laliberte E et al., 2013. Biotic plant–soil feedbacks across temporal scales. Journal of Ecology, 101(2): 309–315. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knops J M H, Bradley K L, Wedin D A, 2002. Mechanisms of plant species impacts on ecosystem nitrogen cycling. Ecology Letters, 5(3): 454–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulmatiski A, Beard K H, Stevens J R et al., 2008. Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecology letters, 11(9): 980–912. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lanchlan H, Fraser Tara E Miletti, 2008. Effects of minor water depth treatments on competitive effect and response of eight wetland plants. Plant Ecology, 195}(1}): 33–43. doi: 10.1007/s11258-007-9296Google Scholar
  24. Liu Guangsong, 1996. Analysis of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Description of Soil Profiles. Bejing: Chinese Standard Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lou Y Y, Wang G P, Lu X G et al., 2013. Zonation of plant cover and environmental factors in wetlands of the Sanjiang Plain, northeast China. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31(6): 748–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.01721.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Massaccesi L, Bardgett R D, Agnelli A et al., 2015. Impact of plant species evenness, dominant species identity and spatial arrangement on the structure and functioning of soil microbial communities in a model grassland. Oecologia, 177(3): 747–759. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3135-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller S P, Bever J D, 1999. Distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in stands of the wetland grass Panicum hemitomon along a wide hydrologic gradient. Oecologia, 119(4): 586–592. doi: 10.1007/s004420050823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell R J, Hester A J, Campbell C D et al., 2012. Explaining the variation in the soil microbial community: do vegetation composition and soil chemistry explain the same or different parts of the microbial variation? Plant Soil, 351(1–2): 355–362. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0968-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moche M, Gutknecht J, Schulz E et al., 2015. Monthly dynamics of microbial community structure and their controlling factors in three floodplain soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 90: 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reddy K R, Patrick J, 1975. Effect of alternate aerobic and anaerobic conditions on redox potential, organic matter decomposition and nitrogen loss in a flooded soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 7(2): 87–94. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(75)90004-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reynolds H L, Packer A, Bever J D et al., 2003. Grassroots exology: plant-microbe-soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology Letters, 84(9): 2281–2291. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/02-0298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rickerl D H, Sancho S O, Anath S, 1994. Vesicular-arbuscular endomycorrhizal colonization of wetland plants. Journal of Environmental Quality, 23(5): 913–916. doi: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300050010xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schlatter D C, Bakker M G, Bradeen J M et al., 2015. Plant community richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial community in soil. Ecology, 96(1): 134–142. doi: 10.1890/13-1648.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Eck W H J M, Van De Steeg H M, Blom C P W P M et al., 2004. Is tolerance to summer flooding correlated with distribution patterns in river floodplains? A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species. Okios, 107(2): 393–405. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13083.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang X, Van Nostrand J D, Deng Y et al., 2015. Scale-dependent effects of climate and geographic distance on bacterial diversity patterns across northern China's grasslands. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 91(12): 1–9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiv133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wardle D A, Bardgett R D, Klironomos J N et al., 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 34(5677): 1620–1633. doi: 10.1126/science.1094875Google Scholar
  37. Weand M P, Arthur M A, Lovett G M et al., 2010. Effects of tree species and N additions on forest floor microbial communities and extracellular enzyme activities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42(12): 2161–2173. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wyatt H H, Curtis J R, Rytas V et al., 2008. Environmental and anthropogenic controls over bacterial communities in wetland soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 105(46): 17842–17847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808254105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang Guisheng, Song Changchun, Wang Li et al., 2010. Influence of water level gradient on marsh soil microbial activity of Calamagrostis angustifolia. Environment Science, 31: 444–449. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  40. Zhao J, Wang X L, Shao Y H et al., 2011. Effects of vegetation removal on soil properties and decomposer organisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(5): 954–960. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zedler J B, Kercher S, 2005. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30: 39–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Qin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ming Jiang
    • 1
  • Wei Tian
    • 2
  • Jian Zhang
    • 2
  • Weihong Zhu
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Northeast Institute of Geography and AgroecologyChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina
  2. 2.Geography Department of SciencesYanbian UniversityYanjiChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Natural Resources of Changbai Mountain & Functional MoleculesYanjiChina
  5. 5.State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation RestorationNortheast Normal UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations