Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wetland economic valuation approaches and prospects in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem services valuation seeks to increase the social relevance of ecosystem characteristics, the underlying biological mechanisms that support services, by making the contribution of ecosystems to human well-being explicit. Economic valuation can help management by clarifying the full range of benefits and costs of proposed management actions. In the past two decades, economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services has become one of the most significant scientific priorities for wetland protection. In this paper, we provide an overview of ecosystem services, and summarize the main interdisciplinary approaches to measure and value wetland ecosystem services. We identified four main methodological gaps preventing progress on wetland valuation of ecosystem services in China, which are: 1) confusion on terminology like intermediate and final ecosystem services, 2) lack of ecological production functions to link ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services, 3) static valuation making it difficult to evaluate the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services, and 4) lack of clear guidance on relating ecological compensation programs to conservation targets. Overcoming these gaps is important to inform wetland compensation mechanisms and conservation policies. We propose future research on wetland ecosystem services in China should be focused on: 1) defining final ecosystem services based on beneficiary preferences and underlying biophysical mechanisms, 2) establishing wetland monitoring programs at specific sites to collect data on final ecosystem service indicators and ecosystem characteristic metrics to create ecological production functions for economic valuation and rescaling techniques, and 3) incorporating wetland ecosystem service values into decision-making processes to inform wetland management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen H, Johns D, Phillips C et al., 2002. Wahi-Ngaro (the Lost Portion): strengthening relationships between people and wetlands in north Taranaki, New Zealand. World Archaeology, 34(2): 315–329. doi: 10.1080/0043824022000007125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier E B, Acreman M C, Knowler D, 1997. Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Gland: Ramsar Convention Bureau: 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier E B, Koch E W, Silliman B R et al., 2008. coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science, 319(5861): 321–323. doi: 10.1126/science.1150349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M, 2009. Markets for ecosystem services in China: an exploration of China’s’ Eco-compensation’ and other market-based environmental policies. Forest Trends. Available at: http://www.forest-trends.org/publication_details.php?publicati onID=2317

    Google Scholar 

  • Bockstael N, Freeman A M, Kopp R et al., 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(8): 1384–1389. doi: 10.1021/es990673l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S, 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3): 616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander L M, Florax R, Vermaat J E, 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33(2): 223–250. doi: 10.1007/s10640-005-3104-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R, Langford I H, Bateman I J et al., 1999. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Regional Environmental Change, 1(1): 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z M, Chen G Q, Chen B et al., 2009. Net ecosystem services value of wetland: environmental economic account. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14(6): 2837–2843. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2008.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z X, Zhang X S, 2000. Value of ecosystem services in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(10): 870–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China News, 2014. Available at: http://news.china.com.cn/2014-01/13/content31169563.htm. (in Chinese)

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook B R, Spray C J, 2012). Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: different paths to the same end? Journal of Environmental Management, 109: 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.05.016

  • Crase L, Gillespie R, 2008. The impact of water quality and water level on the recreation values of Lake Hume. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 15(1): 21–29. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2008.9725179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 21–28. doi: 10.1890/080025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Hamilton K, Pagiola S et al., 2008. Environmental economics at the World Bank. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(1): 4–25. doi: 10.1093/reep/rem025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J, 2002. A Typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393–408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot R S, Alkemade R, Braat L et al., 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3): 260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom. 2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B et al., 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecological Economics, 63(4): 714–721. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04. 007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P R, Mooney H A, 1983. Extinction, substition, and ecosystem services. Bioscience, 33(4): 248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Armsworth P R, Anderson B J et al., 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47(2): 377–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle V D, 2011. Estimating the provision of ecosystem services by gulf of Mexico coastal wetlands. Wetlands, 31(1): 179–193. doi: 10.1007/s13157-010-0132-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber S, Costanza R, Childers D L et al., 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. BioScience, 56(2): 117–129. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M et al., 2008. Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications, 18(8): 2050–2067. doi: 10.1890/07-1537.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner R K, Morling P, 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3): 643–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman A M, 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu B J, Su C H, Wei Y P et al., 2011. Double counting in ecosystem services valuation: causes and countermeasures. Ecological Research, 26(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0766-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hails R S, Ormerod S, 2013. Ecological science for ecosystem services and the stewardship of natural capital. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4): 807–811. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R H, Potschin M B, 2009. Methodologies for defining and assessing ecosystem services. In: Final Report of Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), Project Code C80-0170-0062. Nottinghamshire: Nottingham, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton J M, 2007. Coastal landscape and the hedonic price of accommodation. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4): 594–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R J, Russell M, 2011. An operational structure for clarity in ecosystem service values. Ecological Economics, 70(12): 2243–2249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts T H et al., 2011. Natural Capital: Theory & Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–365.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler B L, Polasky S, Brauman K A et al., 2012. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(45): 18619–18624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontogianni A, Luck G W, Skourtos M, 2010. Valuing ecosystem services on the basis of service-providing units: a potential approach to address the’ endpoint problem’ and improve stated preference methods. Ecological Economics, 69(7): 1479–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Kun, Zhang Mingxiang, 2005. The wetland resources in China and the conservation advices. Wetland Science, 3(2): 81–86. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y Y, Wang W N, Ou C X et al., 2010. Valuation of shrimp ecosystem services—a case study in Leizhou City, China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(3): 217–224. doi: 10.1080/13504501003718567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon R A, Chaubey I, 2013. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 257: 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X G, Jiang M, 2004. Progress and prospect of wetland research in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 14(1): 45–51. doi: 10.1007/BF02841106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 1–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch W J, Tejada J, Nahlik A et al., 2008. Tropical wetlands for climate change research, water quality management and conservation education on a university campus in Costa Rica. Ecological Engineering, 34(4): 276–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng. 2008.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison E H J, Upton C, Odhiambo-K’ Oyooh K et al., 2012. Managing the natural capital of papyrus within riparian zones of Lake Victoria, Kenya. Hydrobiologia, 692(1): 5–17. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0839-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy S, Collins N C, Doka S E et al., 2012. Evidence of yellow perch, largemouth bass and pumpkinseed metapopulations in coastal embayments of Lake Ontario. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 95(2): 213–226. doi: 10.1007/s10641-012-9978-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahlik A M, Kentula M E, Fennessy M S et al., 2012. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological Economics, 77: 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council), 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press, 1–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins T G, Ferraro S P, Dantin D D et al., 2010. Habitat scale mapping of fisheries ecosystem service values in estuaries. Ecology and Society, 15(4): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer M L, 2009. Assessing benefit transfer for the valuation of ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 38–45. doi: 10.1890/080091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Segerson K, 2009. Integrating ecology and economics in the study of ecosystem services: some lessons learned. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1: 409–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2565226.htm. (in Chinese)

  • RCS (Ramsar Convention Secretariat), 2006. The Ramsar Convention Manual: A Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (4th ed.). Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming G S et al., 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5): 268–273. doi: 10.1890/1201444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringold P L, Boyd J, Landers D et al., 2013. What data should we collect? A framework for identifying indicators of ecosystem contributions to human well-being. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(2): 98–105. doi: 10.1890/110156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt R, Dormann C F, Eppink F V et al., 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3): 630–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smardon R C, 2006. Heritage values and functions of wetlands in Southern Mexico. Landscape and Urban Planning, 74(3–4): 296–312. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer K L, Harvey G L, 2012. Understanding system disturbance and ecosystem services in restored saltmarshes: integrating physical and biogeochemical processes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 106: 23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallis H, Polasky S, 2009. Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162: 265–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity), 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong C F, Feagin R A, Lu J J et al., 2007. Ecosystem service values and restoration in the urban Sanyang wetland of Wenzhou, China. Ecological Engineering, 29(3): 249–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2009. Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services: A Report of the EPA Science Advisory Board. Washington D.C.: US EPA, 8–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang G H, Fang Q H, Zhang L P et al., 2010a. Valuing the effects of hydropower development on watershed ecosystem services: case studies in the Jiulong River Watershed, Fujian Province, China. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 86(3): 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Chen W Q, Zhang L P et al., 2010b. Estimating the ecosystem service losses from proposed land reclamation projects: a case study in Xiamen. Ecological Economics, 69(12): 2549–2556. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G L, Cui B S, Yang Z F et al., 2007. Comparison of changes of typical river segment ecosystem service value in LRGR. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(2 supp.): 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westman W E, 1977. How much are nature’s services worth. Science, 197(4307): 960–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward R T, Wui Y, 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 257–270. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00276-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder S, Engel S, Pagiola S, 2008. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 834–852. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa et al., 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(2): 189–196. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Chang J, Xu B et al., 2008. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: a case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecological Economics, 68(1–2): 116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Li W H, Xie G D, 2010. Ecosystem services research in China: progress and perspective. Ecological Economics, 69(7): 1389–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X Y, Lu X G, 2010. Multiple criteria evaluation of ecosystem services for the Ruoergai Plateau Marshes in Southwest China. Ecological Economics, 69(7): 1463–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao B, Kreuter U, Li B et al., 2004. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island, China. Land Use Policy, 21(2): 139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Zhou G S, 2009. Measurement and modelling of evapotranspiration over a reed (Phragmites australis) marsh in Northeast China. Journal of Hydrology, 372(1–4): 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China

    Bo Jiang & Zhiyun Ouyang

  2. Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute, Wuhan, 430051, China

    Bo Jiang

  3. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA

    Christina P. Wong

  4. Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, 100091, China

    Lijuan Cui

Authors
  1. Bo Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina P. Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lijuan Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiyun Ouyang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyun Ouyang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Forestry Nonprofit Industry Scientific Research Special Project (No. 201204201), National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2011BAJ07B05)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, B., Wong, C.P., Cui, L. et al. Wetland economic valuation approaches and prospects in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 26, 143–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0790-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0790-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation