Abstract
The northeastern China, the United States, and the western Europe are important agricultural regions both on the global and regional scales. The western Europe has a longer history of agricultural land development than the eastern United States. These two regions have changed from the deforestation and reclamation phase in the past to the current land abandonment and reforestation phase. Compared with the two regions, large-scale land exploitation has only been practiced in the northeastern China during the last century. After a short high-intensity deforestation and reclamation period, agricultural and forest lands are basically in a dynamic steady state. By comparing domestic and international agro-forestry development and considering the ecological environment and socio-economic benefits that can be derived from agro-forestry, this paper suggests that large area of reforestation would be inevitable in future though persistent and large agricultural demand in coming decades even more. And local reforestation at slope farmland with ecological vulnerability should be imperative at present to avoid severer damage. At the same time, from the perspective of Land Change Science, the results demonstrate that the research on land use change in the agro-forestry ecotone is typical and critical, particularly those dealing with the analysis of spatial and temporal characteristics and the simulation of climate, hydrology, and other environmental effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams M D, Ruffner C M, 1995. Physiographic analysis of witness- tree distribution (1965–1978) and present forest over through north center Pennsylvania. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 659–668. doi: 10.1139/x95-073
Barton B, 1977. The comparability of geographic methodologies: A study of New England settlement. Ann Arbor: Department of Geography, University of Michigan.
Benito E, Santiago J S, De Blas E et al., 2003. Deforestation of water-repellent soils in Galicia (NW Spain): Effects on surface runoff and erosion under simulated rainfall. Earth Surf Processes Landforms, 28: 145–155. doi: 10.1002/esp.431
Bork H R, Dalchow C, Faust B et al., 1998. Landschaftsentwicklung in Mitteleuropa: Wirkungen des Menschen auf Landschaften, Gotha: Klett-Perthes. (in Germany)
Brian Stone, 2009. Land use as climate change mitigation. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(24): 9052–9056. doi:10.1021/es902150g.
Chen Junfeng, Li Xiubin, 2001. The impact of forest change on watershed hydrology-Discussing some controversies on forest hydrology. Journal of Natural Resources, 16(5): 474–480. (in Chinese)
FAO, 1996. Our land our future. Food and Agriculture Organization and United Nations Environment Programme, Rome.
GLP (Lobal Land Project), 2005. Science plan and implementation strategy. IGBP Report No.53 and IHDP Report No.19
Gutman G, Anthony C Janetos, Christopher O Justice et al., 2004. Land Change Science: Observing, Monitoring and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth’s Surface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 10–22.
Juliana Delgado, Pilar Llorens, Guillaume Nord et al., 2010. Modelling the hydrological response of a Mediterranean medium- sized headwater basin subject to land cover change: The Cardener River basin (NE Spain). Journal of Hydrology, 383(1–2): 125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.024
Kalnay E, Cai M, 2003. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature, 423(6939): 528–531. doi: 10.1038/nature01675
Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, de Vos M et al., 2011. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human induced land use change over the past 12,000 years. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1): 73–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00587.x.
Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Janssen P, 2010. Long term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way, HYDE 3.1. The Holocene, 20(4): 565–573. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959683609356587
Li Beibei, Fang Xiuqi, Ye Yu et al., 2010. Accuracy assessment of global historical cropland datasets based on regional reconstructed historical data-A case study in Northeast China. Science China Earth Sciences, 53(11) 1689–1699. doi: 10.1007/s11430-010-4053-5
Li Shidong, 2002. Comparison on conversion of cropland to forest and grassland in the world. World Forestry Research, 15(2): 22–27. (in Chinese)
Li Wenhua, 1996. Research of Forest Resources in China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 25–28. (in Chinese)
Mather A S, 2007. Recent Asian forest transitions in relation to forest-transition theory. International Forestry Review, 9(1): 491–502. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1505/ifor.9.1.491
Mather A S, Fairbairn J, Needle C L, 1999. The course and drivers of the forest Transition: The case of France. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(1): 65–90. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00023-0
Mount N J, Sambrook Smith G H, Stott T A, 2005. An assessment of the impact of upland afforestation on lowland river reaches: The Afon Trannon, mid-Wales. Geomorphology, 64(3–4): 255–269. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.003
Perz S G, 2007. Grand theory and context-specificity in the study of forest dynamics: Forest transition theory and other directions. Professional Geographer, 59(1): 105–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00594.x
Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Jim McAdam, María Rosa Mosquera-Losada, 2009. Agroforestry in Europe Current Status and Future Prospects. Netherlands: Springer.
Robbins P, Fraser A, 2003. A forest of contradictions: Producing the landscapes of the Scottish Highlands. Antipode, 35(1): 95–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00304
Rudel T K, Schneider L, Uriarte M, 2010. Forest transitions: An introduction. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 95–97. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.021.
Satake A, Rudel T M, 2007. Modelling the forest transition: forest scarcity and ecosystem service hypotheses. Ecological Applications, 17: 2024–2036. doi: 10.1890/07-0283.1
Smith B E, Marks P L, Gardescu S, 1993. Two hundred years of forest cover changes in Tompkins County, New York. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 120(3): 229–247.
Turner B L, Skole II D, Fischer G et al., 1995. Land-use and land-cover change: science/ research plan. IGBP Reprot No.35 and IHDP Report No.7, Stockholm and Geneva.
Turner B L II, Eric F Lambin, Anette Reenberg, 2007. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(52): 20666–20671. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704119104
Ye Yu, Fang Xiuqi, Ren Yuyu et al., 2009. Cropland cover change in Northeast China during the past 300 years. Science China Earth Science, 52(8): 1172–1182. doi: 10.1007/s11430-009-0118-8
Zhang Shuwen, Zhang Yangzhen, Li Ying et al., 2006. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Change in Northeastern China. Beijing: Science Press, 180–208. (in Chinese)
Zhang Taolin, Li Zhongpei, Wang Xingxiang, 2006. Soil degradation and its eco-environmental impact under highly-intensified agriculture. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 43(5): 843–850. (in Chinese)
Zhang Y K, Schilling K E, 2006. Increasing streamflow and baseflow in the Mississippi River since 1940s: Effect of land use change. Journal of Hydrology, 324: 412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.033
Zhou L, Dickinson R, Tian Y et al., 2004. Evidence of significant urbanization effect on climate in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(26): 9540–9544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400357101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of Strategic Pilot Science and Technology Projects of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA05090310)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, T., Zhang, S., Tang, J. et al. Comparison and analysis of agricultural and forest land changes in typical agricultural regions of northern mid-latitudes. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 23, 163–172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0576-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0576-3