Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental effects of foreign trade and its spatial variations in mid-eastern provinces and cities of China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The studies on environmental effects of foreign trade and its spatial variations are helpful to design and implement environmental protection countermeasures. In order to eliminate the adverse effects of insufficient observation values on the accuracy of regression results and dynamic information quantity of fitting equation during empirical study, panel data of the mid-eastern provinces and cities of China from 1985 to 2007 were selected based on the adjustment of classical regression model in this paper. Panel unit root test and panel cointegration analysis method were applied to investigating the environmental effects of foreign trade and its spatial variations in the mid-eastern provinces and cities of China and its three groups divided by foreign trade dependence. The results show that all scale effects are positive, while all technical effects are negative and unable to counteract positive scale effects. Foreign trade development is regarded as an important cause for outstanding eco-environmental problems in the mid-eastern provinces and cities of China. Total effects and structural effects are significantly different among different groups because of spatial variations in environmental policies, export destinations, source of FDI, etc. Following the principle of ‘coordinating generality and considering differences comprehensively’, it is essential to issue a series of policies and countermeasures corresponding to differences in regional environmental effect of foreign trade, in order to coordinate the relationship between foreign trade development and eco-environment in each region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antweiler W, Copeland B R, Taylor M S, 2001. Is free trade good of the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4): 877–908. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.4.877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Beijing Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Beijing Environmental Status Bulletin. Beijing: Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean J M, 2002. Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4): 819–842. doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujian Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Fujian Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Fujian Environmental Status Bulletin. Fujian: Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman G M, Krueger A B, 1993. Environmental impacts of a North American free agreement. In: Garber et al. (eds). The MEXICO-U.S Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Guangdong Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangdong Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Guangdong Environmental Status Bulletin. Guangdong: Guangdong Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangxi Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Guangxi Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangxi Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Guangxi Environmental Status Bulletin. Guangxi: Guangxi Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Hainan Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainan Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Hainan Environmental Status Bulletin. Hainan: Hainan Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebei Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Hebei Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Hebei Environmental Status Bulletin. Hebei: Hebei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilongjiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Heilongjiang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilongjiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Heilongjiang Environmental Status Bulletin. Heilongjiang: Heilongjiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Im K S, Pesaran M H, Shin Y, 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53–74. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jilin Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Jilin Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jilin Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Jilin Environmental Status Bulletin. Jilin: Jilin Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiangsu Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Jiangsu Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Jiangsu Environmental Status Bulletin. Jiangsu: Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Roland H D, 1993. International trade and the transfer of environmental costs and benefits. In: OECD Development Center (ed). OECD Development Centre Working Papers. Paris: OECD, 6–52. doi: 10.1787/854022818551

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin C F, Chu J et al., 2002. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Economentrics, 108(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiuxiang, Zhang Ting, 2004. Empirical study on environmental effect caused by Export in China: Take CO2 discharge as an example. Journal of International Trade, 30(7): 9–12. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Liaoning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Liaoning Environmental Status Bulletin. Liaoning: Liaoning Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China, 1986–2008. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P, 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panel. The review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4): 727–731. doi: 10.1162/003465301753237803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni P, 2004. Panel Cointegration: A symptotic and finite sample properties of pooled times series tests, with an application to the PPP Hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3): 597–625. doi: 10+10170S0266466604203073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shandong Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Shandong Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shangdong Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Shandong Environmental Status Bulletin. Shangdong: Shangdong Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Shanghai Environmental Status Bulletin. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen Rongshan, Ren Rongming, 2006. Empirical study on the environmental effect of trade liberalization. Journal of International Trade, 32(7): 66–70. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tianjin Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Tianjin Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tianjin Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Tianjin Environmental Status Bulletin. Tianjin: Tianjin Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO, 2005. WHO Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide Global Update 2005—Summary of Risk Assessment. New York: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Qiaosheng, Chen Liang, Zhang Yantao et al., 2008. Retesting the granger causality between energy consumption and GDP in China: Based on the provincial panel data analysis. Journal of Qantitative and Technical Economics, 25(6): 27–40. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Jiqin, Jin Xianfeng, 2009. Environmental effect of foreign trade in the active export-oriented region: Case study of Zhejiang province. Journal of International Trade, 35(9): 43–48. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Lianzhong, Zhu Tan, Li Muhan et al., 2003. Study on environment pollution caused by trade liberalization in China. Nankai Economic Studies, 19(3): 27–30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Mei, 2006. Empirical analysis on the environmental effects of Guangdong’s export trade. International Trade Problems, 32(4): 107–110. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 1986–2008. Zhejiang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, 2007. Zhejiang Environmental Status Bulletin. Zhejiang: Zhejiang Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianfeng Jin.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Major State Basic Research Development Program (No. 2007FY110300), Soft Science Research Project of Chongqing Science & Technology Commission (No. CSTC2011cx-rkxA0120), Science and Technology Research Project of Chongqing (No. CSTC, 2009CB2015)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jin, X., Dong, S., Luo, L. et al. Environmental effects of foreign trade and its spatial variations in mid-eastern provinces and cities of China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 22, 626–636 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0546-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0546-9

Keywords

Navigation