Skip to main content
Log in

Agricultural land use optimal allocation system in developing area: Application to Yili watershed, Xinjiang Region

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In developing countries, land productivity involves little market, where the agricultural land use is mainly determined by the food demands as well as the land suitability. The land use pattern will not ensure everywhere enough land for certain cropping if spatial allocation just according to land use suitability. To solve this problem, a subzone and a pre-allocation for each land use are added in spatial allocation module, and land use suitability and area optimization module are incorporated to constitute a whole agricultural land use optimal allocation (ALUOA) system. The system is developed on the platform.Net 2005 using ArcGIS Engine (version 9.2) and C# language, and is tested and validated in Yili watershed of Xinjiang Region on the newly reclaimed area. In the case study, with the help of soil data obtained from 69 points sampled in the fieldwork in 2008, main river data supplied by the Department of Water Resources of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region in China, and temperature data provided by Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, land use suitability on eight common crops are evaluated one by one using linear weighted summation method in the land use suitability model. The linear programming (LP) model in area optimization model succeeds to give out land area target of each crop under three scenarios. At last, the land use targets are allotted in space both with a six subzone file and without a subzone file. The results show that the land use maps with a subzone not only ensure every part has enough land for every crop, but also gives a more fragmental land use pattern, with about 87.99% and 135.92% more patches than the one without, while at the expense of loss between 15.30% and 19.53% in the overall suitability at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carver S, 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 5(3): 321–339. doi: 10.1080/02693799108927858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croteau K G, Faber B G, Vernon L T, 1997. Smart places: A tool for design and evaluation of land use scenarios. Proceedings of the 1997 ESRI User Conference (CDROM). San Diego: Environmental Systems Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai F C, Lee C F, Zhang X H, 2001. GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: A case study. Engineering Geology, 61(4): 257–271. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00028-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosa D, Moreno J A, Garcia L V et al., 1992. MicroLEIS: A microcomputer-based mediterranean land evaluation information-system. Soil Use and Management, 8(2): 89–96. doi: 10. 1111/j.1475-2743.1992.tb00900.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of methematics of Tongji university, 2010. Linear algebra. Shanghai: Tongji university press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman J R, Jin W, Kyem P A K et al., 1995. Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61(5): 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer G, Granat J, Makowski M, 1998. An Interactive Multiple-criteria Analysis Tool for Land Resources Appraisal. Interim Report IR-98-051. Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman R E, 1999. The what if? Collaborative planning support system. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 26(3): 393–408. doi: 10.1068/b260393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman R E, 2001. The what if? Planning support system. In: Brail R K (ed.). Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Visualization Tools. Redlands: ESRI Press, 262–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwartler M, Bernard R N, 2001. CommunityViz: An Integrated Planning Support System. Redlands: ESRI Press, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Chunyan, Wang Jing, He Ting et al., 2006. Comprehensive description on land resource allocation models. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(2): 21–22. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J, 2006. Integrating multicriteria analysis and geographic information systems: The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6(1): 7–19. doi: 10.1504/IJETM.2006.008251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews K B, Sibbald A R, Craw S, 1999. Implementation of a spatial decision support system for rural land use planning: Integrating geographic information system and environmental models with search and optimisation algorithms. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 23(1): 9–26. doi: 10.1016/ S0168-1699(99)00005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng J J, 2005. Land Evaluation and Management. Beijing: Science press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetter R P, Hoanh C T, Laborte A G et al., 2005. Integration of systems network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 20(3): 291–307. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter D G, 1990. Ales: A framework for land evaluation using a microcomputer. Soil Use and Management, 6(1): 7–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.1990.tb00790.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sante-Riveira I, Crecente-Maseda R, Miranda-Barros D, 2008. GIS-based planning support system for rural land-use allocation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 63(2): 257–273. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2008.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siskos Y, Despotis D K, Ghediri M, 1994. Multiobjective modelling for regional agricultural planning: Case study in Tunisia. European Journal of Operational Research, 77(3): 375–391. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90404-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart T J, Janssen R, van Herwijnen M, 2004. A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning. Computers & Operations Research, 31(14): 2293–2313. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00188-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ittersum M K, Hijmans R J, Scheele D, 1995. Description and User Guide of GOAL-QUASI: An IMGLP Model for the Exploration of Future Land Use. Wageningen: DLO Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell P, 2002. Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3): 297–314. doi: 10.1080/01944360208976274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson P M, Wadsworth R A, 1996. A computerised decision support system for rural policy formulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10(4): 425–440. doi: 10.1080/02693799608902088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yili Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2007. Yili Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X L, Wu Y Z, Shen L Y, 2011. An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat International, 35(1): 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongqi Zhang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41001108, 41071065), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 9113029)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Ni, D. et al. Agricultural land use optimal allocation system in developing area: Application to Yili watershed, Xinjiang Region. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 22, 232–244 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0530-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0530-4

Keywords

Navigation