Advertisement

Chinese Geographical Science

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 29–41 | Cite as

Simulating net carbon budget of forest ecosystems and its response to climate change in northeastern China using improved FORCCHN

  • Junfang Zhao
  • Xiaodong Yan
  • Gensuo Jia
Article

Abstract

As dominant biomes, forests play an important and indispensable role in adjusting the global carbon balance under climate change. Therefore, there are scientific and political implications in investigating the carbon budget of forest ecosystems and its response to climate change. Here we synthesized the most recent research progresses on the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems, and applied an individual-based forest ecosystem carbon budget model for China (FORCCHN) to simulate the dynamics of the carbon fluxes of forest ecosystems in the northeastern China. The FORCCHN model was further improved and applied through adding variables and modules of precipitation (rainfall and snowfall) interception by tree crown, understory plants and litter. The results showed that the optimized FORCCHN model had a good performance in simulating the carbon budget of forest ecosystems in the northeastern China. From 1981 to 2002, the forests played a positive role in absorbing carbon dioxide. However, the capability of forest carbon sequestration had been gradually declining during the the same period. As for the average spatial distribution of net carbon budget, a majority of the regions were carbon sinks. Several scattered areas in the Heilongjiang Province and the Liaoning Province were identified as carbon sources. The net carbon budget was apparently more sensitive to an increase of air temperature than change of precipitation.

Keywords

net carbon budget climate change northeastern China improved FORCCHN 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amthor J S, 1995. Terrestrial higher-plant response to increasing atmospheric [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 1(4): 243–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrota V K, Boer G J, 2005. A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models. Global Change Biology, 11(1): 39–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00890.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates B C, Kundzewicz Z W, Wu S et al., 2008. Climate Change and Water Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat, 1–210.Google Scholar
  4. Cai Tijiu, Liu Qiang, Wang Lu, 1996. Study on soil water balance of artificial Larix gmelinii trees. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 24(1): 62–67. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. Cao M K, Woodward F I, 1998a. Dynamic responses of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling to global climate change. Nature, 393: 249–252. doi: 0.1038/30460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao M K, Woodward F I, 1998b. Net primary and ecosystem production and carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems and their response to climate change. Global Change Biology, 4(2): 185–198. doi: 0.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00125.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox P M, Betts R A, Jones C D et al., 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 408: 184–187. doi: 10.1038/35041539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eamanuel W R, Shugart H H, Stevenson M P, 1985. Climate change and the broad-scale distribution of terrestrial ecosystem complexes. Climatic Change, 7(1): 29–43. doi: 10.1007/BF 00139439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang Jinyun, Chen Aping, 2001. Dynamic forest biomass carbon pools in China and their significance. Acta Botanica Sinica, 4(9): 967–973. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H et al., 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292(5525): 2320–2322. doi: 10.1126/science.1058629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang J Y, Piao S L, Field C et al., 2003. Increasing net primary production in China from 1982 to 1999. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(6): 293–297. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295 (2003)001[0294:INPPIC]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fang J Y, Wang G G, Liu G H, 1998. Forest biomass of China: An estimate based on the biomass-volume relationship. Ecological Applications, 8: 1084–1091. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761 (1998)008[1084:FBOCAEGoogle Scholar
  13. Friend A D, Stevens A K, Knox R G et al., 1997. A process-based terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0). Ecological Modelling, 95(2–3): 249–287. doi: 10.1016/ S0304-3800(96)00034-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerten D, Schaphoff S, Haberlandt U et al., 2004. Terrestrial vegetation and water balance: Hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model. Journal of Hydrology, 286(1–4): 249–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg V, Bernhofer C H, 2001. Quantifying the coupling degree between land surface and the atmospheric boundary layer with the coupled vegetation-atmosphere model HIRVAC. Annales Geophysicae, 19(5): 581–587. doi: 10.5194/angeo-19-581-2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan D X, Wu J B, Zhao X S et al., 2006. CO2 fluxes over an old, temperate mixed forest in northeastern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 137(3–4): 138–149. doi: 10.1016/j. agrformet.2006.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang Yao, 2008. The Carbon Budget Model of Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Hickler T, Benjamin S, Martin T S et al., 2003. Using a generalized vegetation model to simulate vegetation dynamics in northeastern USA. Ecology, 85(2): 519–530. doi: 10.1890/02-0344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Houghton R A, 2003. Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different? Global Change Biology, 9: 500–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houghton R A, Woodwell G M, 1989. Global climatic change. Scientific American, 260: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janack J, 1997. Stomatal limitation of photosynthesis as affected by water stress and CO2 concentration. Photosynthetica, 34(3): 473–476. doi: 10.1023/A:1006880521888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeling R F, Piper S C, Heimann M, 1996. Global and hemispheric CO2 sinks deduced from changes in atmospheric O2 concentration. Nature, 381: 218–221. doi: 10.1038/381218a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li K R, Wang S Q, Cao M K, 2004. Vegetation and soil carbon storage in China. Science in China (Series D), 47(1): 49–57. dio: 10.1360/02yd0029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Zhenquan, Shi Qingwu, 1998. Geography Pandect of Northeast Economy Region. Changchun: Northeast Normal University Press, 1–530. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Liang N, Maruyama K, 1995. Interactive effect of CO2 enrichment and drought stress on gas exchange and water-use efficiency in Alnus firma. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 35(3): 353–361. doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(95)00009-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Mingliang, 2001. Studies on Vegetations Productivity and Carbon Pool of Terrestrial Ecosystem and Changes of LUCC in China. Beijing: Institute of Remote of Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Lu X, 2006. Guidance on the Development of Regional Climate Scenarios for Application in Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments within the Framework of National Communications from Parties not Included in Annex I to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. National Communications Support Programme. New York: UNDP-UNEP-GEF, 1–42.Google Scholar
  28. Luo Tianxiang, 1996. Studies on Productivity Patterns and Mathematics Models of Major Forest Types in China. Beijing: Committee of Natural Resources Integration Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Meier M, Fuhrer J, 1997. Effect of elevated CO2 on orchard grass and red clover grown in mixture at two levels of nitrogen or water supply. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 38(3): 251–262. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00020-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melillo J M et al., 1993. Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature, 363: 234–240. doi: 10.1038/ 363234a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohan J E, Clark J S, Schlesinger W H, 2007. Long-term CO2 enrichment of a forest ecosystem: Implications for forest regeneration and succession. Ecological Applications, 17(4): 1198–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neilson R P, King G A, Koerper G, 1992. Towards a rule-based biome model. Landscape Ecology, 7(1): 27–43. doi: 10.1007/ BF02573955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oechel W C, Vourlitis G L, Hastings S J et al., 2000. Acclimation of ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Alaskan Arctic in response to decadal climate warming. Nature, 406: 978–981. doi: 10.1038/35023137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parton W J, 1993. Observation and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7(4): 785–809. doi: 10.1029/ 93GB02042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan Y D, Luo T X, Birdsey R et al., 2004. New estimate of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Climatic Change, 67(2–3): 211–236. doi: 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng C H, Apps M J, 1997. Contribution of China to the global carbon cycle since Last Glacial Maximum: Reconstruction from paleovegetation maps and an empirical biosphere model. Tellus, 49B: 393–408. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.49.issue4.5.xGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips D L, Brown S L, Schroeder P E et al., 2000. Toward error analysis of large-scale forest carbon budgets. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 9: 305–313. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00197.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piao S, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P et al., 2007. Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature, 451: 49–53. doi: 10.1038/nature06444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piao S L, Fang J Y, Guo Q H, 2001. Estimation of of net primary productivity in China using CASA model. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25(5): 603–608.Google Scholar
  40. Piao S L, Fang J Y, Zhou L M et al., 2005. Changes in vegetation net primary productivity from 1982 to 1999 in China. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 19(GB2027): 20–27. doi: 10.1029/2004 GB002274Google Scholar
  41. Pregitzer K S, Euskirchen E S, 2004. Carbon cycling and storage in world forests: Biome patterns related to forest age. Global Change Biology, 10(12): 2052–2077. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00866.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prentice I C, 1993. Biome modelling and carbon cycles. In: Heimann M (ed.). The Global Carbon Cycles. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 219–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prince S D, Goward S N, Goetz S et al., 2000. Inter-annual atmosphere-biosphere variation: Implications for observation and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(D15): 20055–20063. doi: 10.1029/2000JD900177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith T M, Shugart H H, 1993. The transient response of terrestrial carbon storage to a perturbed climate. Nature, 361: 523–526. doi: 10.1038/361523a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Song C, Woodcock C E, 2003. A regional forest ecosystem carbon budget model: Impacts of forest age structure and land use history. Ecological Modeling, 164(1): 33–47. doi: 10.1016/ S0304-3800(03)00013-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tan K, Piao S L, Peng C H et al., 2007. Satellite-based estimation of biomass carbon stocks for Northeast China’s forests between 1982 and 1999. Forest Ecology and Management, 240(1–3): 114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tao Bo, 2003. Modeling Research on Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity and Net Ecosystem Productivity in China. Beijing: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  48. Tilman D, Reich P B, Knops J et al., 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science, 294(5543): 843–845. doi: 10.1126/science.1060391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner D P, Koepper G J, Hanmon M E, 1995. A carbon budget for forests of the continental United States. Ecological Appications, 5: 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verbeeck H, Samson R, Verdonck F et al., 2006. Parameter sensitivity and uncertainty of the forest carbon flux model FORUG: A Monte Carlo analysis. Tree Physiology, 26(6): 807–817. doi: 10.1093/treephys/26.6.807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang S, Chen J M, Ju W M et al., 2007 Carbon sinks and sources in China’s forests during 1901–2001. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(3): 524–537. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang S Q, Tian H Q, Liu J Y, 2002. Characterization of changes in land cover and carbon storage in northeastern China: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Science in China (Series C), 45(supp.): 40–47.Google Scholar
  53. Wang X P, Fang J Y, Zhu B, 2008. Forest biomass and root-shoot allocation in northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(12): 4007–4020. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang Yexu, 1999. Studies on Carbon Cycling of Forest Ecosystem in China. Beijing: Committee of Natural Resources Integration Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Watson R T, Noble I R, Bolin B et al., 2000. Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry—A Special Report of the IPCC. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. White M A, Thornton P E, Runing S W, 1997. A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation response to interannual climatic variability. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 11(2): 217–234. doi: 10.1029/97GB00330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu Haibing, 2002. Studies on Carbon Storage of Terrestrial Ecosystem since the End of Ice Age in China. Beijing: Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  58. Wu Zhengfang, 1997. Response of net primary productivity to climate warming in Northeast China. Economic Geography, 17(4): 49–55. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  59. Yan X D, Zhao J F, 2007. Establishing and validating individualbased carbon budget model FORCCHN of forest ecosystems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(1): 2684–2694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou Lin, 1991. Northeast Climate. Beijing: Meteorology Press, 1–366. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  61. Zhou Yurong, Yu Zhenliang, Zhao Shidong, 2000. Carbon storage and budget of major Chinese forest types. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 24(5): 518–522. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  62. Zhou Yiliang, 1997. Geography of the Vegetation in Northeast of China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  63. Zhu Bin, 2005. Carbon stocks of main forest ecosystems in Northeast China. Beijing: Peking University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agricultural Ecology, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations