Skip to main content
Log in

Scale issues of wetland classification and mapping using remote sensing images: A case of Honghe National Nature Reserve in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wetland research has become a hot spot linking multiple disciplines presently. Wetland classification and mapping is the basis for wetland research. It is difficult to generate wetland data sets using traditional methods because of the low accessibility of wetlands, hence remote sensing data have become one of the primary data sources in wetland research. This paper presents a case study conducted at the core area of Honghe National Nature Reserve in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. In this study, three images generated by airship, from Thematic Mapper and from SPOT 5 were selected to produce wetland maps at three different wetland landscape levels. After assessing classification accuracies of the three maps, we compared the different wetland mapping results of 11 plant communities to the airship image, 6 plant ecotypes to the TM image and 9 landscape classifications to the SPOT 5 image. We discussed the different characteristics of the hierarchical ecosystem classifications based on the spatial scales of the different images. The results indicate that spatial scales of remote sensing data have an important link to the hierarchies of wetland plant ecosystems displayed on the wetland landscape maps. The richness of wetland landscape information derived from an image closely relates to its spatial resolution. This study can enrich the ecological classification methods and mapping techniques dealing with the spatial scales of different remote sensing images. With a better understanding of classification accuracies in mapping wetlands by using different scales of remote sensing data, we can make an appropriate approach for dealing with the scale issue of remote sensing images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeler G D, Viedma O, Sánchez-Carrillo S et al., 2008. Conservation issues of temporary wetland Branchiopoda (Anostraca, Notostraca: Crustacea) in a semiarid agricultural landscape: What spatial scales are relevant? Biological Conversation, 141(5): 1224–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson P M, 1997. Selecting the spatial resolution of airborne MSS image. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(9): 1903–1917. doi: 10.1080/014311697217945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian O, Krönert R, Lipský Z, 2006. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—A challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecology, 21: 359–374. doi: 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bo Yanchen, Wang Jinfeng, 2004. Exploring the scale effect in thematic classification of remotely sensed data: The statistical separability-based method. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 19(6): 443–449. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bo Yanchen, Wang Jinfeng, Li Xiang, 2005. Exploring the scale effect in land cover mapping from remotely sensed data: The statistical separability-based method. IGARSS 2005.

  • Gao Yan, Mas J F, Maathuis H P et al., 2006. Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented image classification approaches-a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(18): 4039–4055. doi: 10.1080/01431160600702632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M F, Quattrochi D A, 1997. Scale, multiscaling, remote sensing, and GIS. In: Quattrochi D A et al. (eds.). Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Peng, Gong Jianya, Li Zhilin, 2008. A new approach for choice of optimal spatial scale in image classification based on entropy. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 33(7): 676–679. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey K R, Hill J E G, 2001. Vegetation mapping of a tropical freshwater swamp in the Northern Territory, Australia: A comparison of aerial photography, LandsatTM and SPOT satellite image. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(15): 2911–2925. doi: 10.1080/01431160119174

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam N, Quattrochi D A, 1992. On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractral analysis in the mapping science. The Professional Geographer, 44(1): 88–98. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1992.00088.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Fangfang, Jia Yonghong, 2008. Study on method of extracting wetland and its changed area based on LandsatTM images. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 33(2): 147–149. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Shujuan, Zheng Hui, 2002. The utilities of remote sensing technique in landscape study. Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(3): 233–240. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Hongyu, Li Yufeng, Cao Xiao, 2009. The current problems and perspectives of landscape research of wetlands in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(11): 1394–1401. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Hongyu, Lu Xianguo, 1999. Study on classification system of middle scale landscape ecology mapping in the Sanjiang Plain. Scientia Geographic Sinica, 19(5): 432–436. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau J D, 1999. The Scale issue in social and natural sciences. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(4): 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau J D, Hay J G, 1999. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(4): 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming Dongping, Wang Qun, Yang Jianyu, 2008. Spatial scale of remote sensing image and selection of optimal spatial resolution. Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(4): 529–537. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch J W, Gosselink G J, 2000. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25–33. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oezsmi S L, Mvarin E B, 2002. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10(5): 381–402. doi:10.1023/A:1020908432489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su Lihong, Li Xiaowen, Huang Yuxia, 2001. An review on scale in remote sensing. Advance in Earth Science, 16(4): 544–548. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J S, Butler R D, Malanson P G, 1998. An overview of scale, pattern, process relationships in geomorphology: A remote sensing and GIS perspective. Geomorphology, 21(3–4): 183–205. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00057-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Zhaofei, Zhang Shuqing, Chen Chun et al., 2010. Classification of remote sensing image for lake and marsh in the area of three river sources based on decision tree using MODIS data. Wetland Science, 8(2): 132–138. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock C E, Strahler A H, 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21(3): 311–332. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(87)90015-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock C E, Strahler A H, Jupp D L B, 1988a. The use of variograms in remote sensing I: Scene models and simulated images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3): 323–348. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90108-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock C E, Strahler A H, Jupp D L B, 1988b. The use of variograms in remote sensing II: Real digital images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3): 349–379. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(88)90109-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Jianguo, 2004. Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: Scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19: 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Jianguo, 2007. Landscape Ecology—Pattern, Process, Scale and Hierarchy (2nd edition). Beijing: The Higher Education Press, 17–19. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Demin, Gong Huili, 2007. Hydro-Ecological Modeling of the Honghe National Nature Reserve. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 104–105. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Demin, Gong Huili, Liu Zhaoli, 2008, Integrated wetland ecologic assessment of environmental condition in water catchments: Linking hydro-ecological modelling and Geoinformation techniques. Ecological Modeling, 214: 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Demin, Gong Huili, Wang Yiyong et al., 2009. Study of driving forces of wetland degradation in the Honghe National Nature Reserve in the Sanjiang Floodplain, Northeast China. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 14: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demin Zhou.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40871241, 40771170), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2007AA12Z176)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, H., Jiao, C., Zhou, D. et al. Scale issues of wetland classification and mapping using remote sensing images: A case of Honghe National Nature Reserve in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 21, 230–240 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0461-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0461-5

Keywords

Navigation