Abstract
Vulnerability is a new field and analytical tool in the study of urban safety. Analysis and assessment of vulnerability provide a new basis for urban planning. This study constructed a quantitative index system for assessing vulnerability, based on the city’s sensitivity and emergency response capacity. City size, density, and spatial form influence a city’s sensitivity to crises and risks, to which vulnerability is positively related. Levels of socio-economic development, infrastructures, and emergency management contribute to a city’s emergency response capacity, with which vulnerability is inversely associated. Vulnerability of 19 large Chinese cities was assessed. Harbin and Shenzhen demonstrated the highest and lowest vulnerability among 19 cities, while Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou ranked the 5th, the 9th and the 12th. Spatially, northern cities tended to be more vulnerable than southern cities. And the differences in vulnerability among cities were explored based on cities’ physical geography conditions, level of socio-economic development, infrastructures, regional status, history of disaster, history of urban planning and development, government policies, etc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrianto L, Matsuda Y, 2002. Developing economic vulnerability indices of environmental disasters in small island regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(4): 393–414. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(02) 00012-4.
Cutter S L, 2003. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.93101
Cutter S L, Mitchell J T, Scott M S, 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4): 713–737. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00219
Downing T E, 2000. Towards a vulnerability science? IHDP Newsletter Update (3). Available from: http://www.ihdp.unibonn.de/html/publications/update/update00_03/IHDPUpdate00_03_research_II.html.
IHDP, 2001. IHDP update, update issue 3/01 focus: Vulnerability. Available at: http://www.ihdp.org.
Janssena M A, Schoon M L, Ke W et al., 2006. Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 240–252. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenv-cha.2006.04.001
Kasperson J X, Kasperson R E, 2001. International Workshop on Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.
Kates R W, 1985. The interaction of climate and society. In: Kates R W et al. (eds.) Climate Impact Assessment SCOPE 27. New York: Wiley, 3–36.
Kates R W, Clark W C, Corell R et al., 2001. Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517): 641–642. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.257359
Li He, Zhang Pingyu, 2008. Economic system vulnerability of mining cities in Northeast China. Journal of China Coal Society, 33(1): 116–120. (in Chinese)
Li He, Zhang Pingyu, 2009. Vulnerability of urban employment of mining cities in Northeast China. Geographical Research, 28(3): 751–760. (in Chinese)
Li He, Zhang Pingyu, Cheng Yeqing, 2008. Concepts and assessment methods of vulnerability. Progress in Geography, 27(2): 18–25. (in Chinese)
McCarthy J J, Canziani O F, Leary N A et al., 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge UK: University Press.
Moran E, Ojima D, Buchman N et al., 2005. Global land project: Science plan and implementation strategy. IGBP Report No.53/IHDP Report No.19. Available at: http://www.igbp.net
Piegorsch W W, Cutter S L, Hardisty F, 2007. Benchmark analysis for quantifying urban vulnerability to terrorist incidents. Risk Analysis, 27(6): 1411–1425. doi: 0.1111/j.15396924.2007.00977.x
Su Fei, Zhang Pingyu, 2009. Research on the vulnerability of mining cities’ social system—A case study of Fuxin City. Areal Research and Development, 28(2): 71–75. (in Chinese)
Su Fei, Zhang Pingyu, Li He, 2008. Vulnerability assessment of coal mining cities’ economic systems in China. Geographical Research, 27(4): 907–916. (in Chinese)
Taubenböck H, Kemper T, Roth A et al., 2006. Assessing vulnerability in Istanbul: An example to support disaster management with remote sensing at ZKI-DLR. In: Fifth International Symposium-German Turkish Joint Geodetic Days, 1–9. Available at: http://helmholtz-eos.dlr.de/docs/Taubenboeck_etal.pdf.
Turner IIB L, Kasperson R E, Matsone P A et al., 2003a. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS, 100(14): 8074–8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
Turner IIB L, Matson P A, McCarthy J J et al., 2003b. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. PNAS, 100(14): 8080–8085.
Xiu Chunliang, Zhu Xiangling, 2003. Countering the sudden calamity: Human resident security and the policy of metropolis. Human Geography, 18(5): 26–30. (in Chinese)
Yang Yanru, Wang Shijun, Song Yang, 2009. On the vulnerability of the man-land system in oil-producing cities and its preventive mechanism. Journal of Yunnan Normal University, 41(2): 71–77. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40635030)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiu, C., Cheng, L., Song, W. et al. Vulnerability of large city and its implication in urban planning: A perspective of intra-urban structure. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 21, 204–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0451-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0451-7