Abstract
In order to improve the effectiveness of Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation (FSE) models, a Parameter Correlation Analysis (PCA) was introduced into the FSE and a case study was carried out in the Naoli River in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. The basic principle of the PCA is that the pairs of parameters which are highly correlated and linear with each other would contribute the same information to an assessment and one of them should be eliminated. The method of the PCA is that a correlation relationship among candidate parameters is examined before the FSE. If there is an apparent nonlinear or curvilinear relationship between two parameters, then both will be retained; if the correlation is significant (p<0.01), and the scatter plot suggests a linear relationship, then one of them will be deleted. However, which one will be deleted? For solving this problem, a sensitivity test was conducted and the higher sensitivity parameters remained. The results indicate that the original data should be preprocessed through the PCA for redundancy and variability. The study shows that introducing the PCA into the FSE can simplify the FSE calculation process greatly, while the results have not been changed much.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Griffith G E et al., 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 15(2): 185–211.
Chang N B, Chen H W, Ning S K, 2001. Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 63(3): 293–305. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2001.0483
Clemens R, David B, 2004. Setting action levels for drinking water: Are we protecting our health or our economy (or our backs!)? Science of the Total Environment, 332(1–3): 13–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.007
Dahiya S, Singh B, Gaur S et al., 2007. Analysis of groundwater quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147(3): 938–946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.119
Fisher B, 2003. Fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications to air pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 1865–1877. DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00028-1
Gong Shaoqi, Huang Jiazhu, Li Yunmei et al., 2005. Integrated fuzzy evaluation of water eutrophication based on GIS in the Taihu Lake. Environmental Science, 26(5): 34–37. (in Chinese)
Hou Wei, Zhang Shuwen, Zhang Yangzhen) et al., 2004. Analysis on the shrinking process of wetland in Naoli River Basin of Sanjiang Plain since the 1950s and its driving forces. Journal of Natural Resources, 19(6), 725–731. (in Chinese)
Karr J R, 1991. Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications, 1(1): 66–84.
Lao Situan, 1990. Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of urban overall environmental quality. China Environmental Science, 10(2): 93–97. (in Chinese)
Li X M, Min M, Tan C F, 2005. The functional assessment of agricultural ecosystems in Hubei Province. China. Ecological Modeling, 187(2–3): 352–360. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.09.006
Liang Z H, Yang K, Sun Y W et al., 2006. Decision support for choice optimal power generation projects: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the electricity market. Energy Policy, 34(17): 3359–3364. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.021
Liu Hongyu, Zhang Shikui, LU Xianguo, 2002. Processes of wetland landscape changes in Naoli River Basin since 1980s. Journal of Natural Resources, 17(6), 698–705. (in Chinese)
Liu Z G, Ma X H, 1997. Effect of reclamation on soil environment in Sanjiang Plain. Pedosphere, 7(1): 73–78.
Liu Xingtu, Ma Xuehui, 2002. Natural Environmental Changes and Ecological Protection in the Sanjiang Plain. Beijing: Science Press, 59–81. (in Chinese)
Lu R S, Lo S L, Hu J Y, 1999. Analysis of reservoir water quality using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 13(5): 327–336. DOI: 10.1007/s004770050054
Lu Xiaoli, Wu Chunyou, Xiao Guirong, 2006. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation on resident’s perceptions of tourism impacts-Case of Jiuzhaigou National Park, Sichuan Province, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 16(1): 87–94. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-006-0028-z.
Luan Zhaoqing, Song Changchun, Deng Wei, 2003. Study on soil fertility variation during wetland reclamation and utilization in the Naoli River Watershed of the Sanjiang Plain. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 25(5): 544–547, 556. (in Chinese)
Mujumdar P P, Sasikumar K, 2002. A fuzzy risk approach for seasonal water quality management of a riversystem. Water Resources Research, 38(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1029/2000wr000126
Onkal-Engin G, Demir I, Hiz H, 2004. Assessment of urban air quality in Istanbul using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Atmospheric Environment, 38(23): 3809–3815. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.058
State Environmental Protection Administration, 2002. Standards for surface water environmental quality (GB3838-2002). Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chineae)
Shen G Q, Lu Y T, Wang M N et al., 2005. Status and fuzzy comprehensive assessment of combined heavy metal and organo-chlorine pesticide pollution in the Taihu Lake region of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(4): 355–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.011
Song Hailiang, Lu Xiwu, Li Xianning, 2006. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in water quality assessment for the west inflow of Taihu Lake. Journal of Safety and Environment, 6(1): 87–91. (in Chinese)
Tan M Z, Xu F M, Chen J et al., 2006. Spatial prediction of heavy metal pollution for soils in peri-urban Beijing, China based on fuzzy set theory. Pedosphere, 16(5): 545–554. DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(06)60087-8
Tang Jie, Zhao Fengqin, Lin Nianfeng et al., 2005. Application of integrated models in evaluating soil nutrients. Journal of Northeast Normal University, 37(1): 109–112. (in Chinese)
Wang H Y, 2002. Assessment and prediction of overall environmental quality of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 66(3): 329–340. DOI: 10.1006/jema.2002.0590
Wang J H, Lu X G, Jiang M, 2009. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of wetland soil quality degradation: A case study on the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Pedosphere, in press.
Wang Xuelei, Ning Longmei, Hu Wangbin, 2003. Application of analytic hierarchy process to assessing the ecological vulnerability of wetlands in the Jianghan Plain. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(3): 272–276. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-003-0030-7
Yang T, Yang X M, 1998. Fuzzy comprehensive assessment, fuzzy clustering analysis and its application for urban traffic environment quality evaluation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(1): 51–57. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-9209(97)00021-7
Zhang J B, Song C C, Yang W Y, 2007a. Tillage effects on soil carbon fractions in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Soil & Tillage Research, 93(1): 102–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.014
Zhang J B, Song C C, Yang W Y, 2007b. Effects of cultivation on soil microbiological properties in a freshwater marsh soil in Northeast China. Soil & Tillage Research, 93(1): 231–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.025
Zhang Shiyu, Xiao Hanliang, 2003. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of container transportation modes along the Changjiang River main line and its delta area. Chinese Geographical Science, 13(3): 259–261. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-003-0027-2
Zhang Wenge, Li Huian, Cai Daying, 2004. Water quality evaluation by fuzzy comprehensive judgment. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 25(4): 70–73. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40830535), Knowledge Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KSCX2-YW-N-46-06)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Lu, X., Tian, J. et al. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of water quality of Naoli River using parameter correlation analysis. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 18, 361–368 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0361-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-008-0361-5