Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of uncertainty of grid DEM on TOPMODEL: Evaluation and analysis

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TOPMODEL, a semi-distributed hydrological model, has been widely used. In the process of simulation of the model, Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is used to provide the input data, such as topographic index and distance to the drainage outlet; thus DEM plays an important role in TOPMODEL. This study aims at examining the impacts of DEM uncertainty on the simulation results of TOPMODEL. In this paper, the effects were evaluated mainly from quantitative and qualitative aspects. Firstly, DEM uncertainty was simulated by using the Monte Carlo method, and for every DEM realization, the topographic index and distance to the drainage outlet were extracted. Secondly, the obtained topographic index and the distance to the drainage outlet were input to the TOPMODEL to simulate seven rainstorm-flood events, and four evaluation indices, such as Nash and Sutcliffe efficiency criterion (EFF), sum of squared residuals over all time steps (SSE), sum of squared log residuals over all time steps (SLE) and sum of absolute errors over all time steps (SAE) were recorded. Thirdly, these four evaluation indices were analyzed in statistical manner (minimum, maximum, range, standard deviation and mean value), and effect of DEM uncertainty on TOPMODEL was quantitatively analyzed. Finally, the simulated hydrographs from TOPMODEL using the original DEM and realizations of DEM were qualitatively evaluated under each flood cases. Results show that the effect of DEM uncertainty on TOPMODEL is inconsiderable and could be ignored in the model’s application. This can be explained by: 1) TOPMODEL is not sensitive to the distribution of topographic index and distance to the drainage outlet; 2) the distribution of topographic index and distance to the drainage outlet are slightly affected by DEM uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beven K J, Kirkby M J, 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Science Bulletin, 24(1): 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P F, 1991. First experiments in viewshed uncertainty the accuracy of the viewshed area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(10): 1321–1327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchini M, Wendling J, Obled C, 1996. Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL. Journal of Hydrology, 175: 293–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes K W, Chadwick O A, Kyriakidis P C, 2000. Error in USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 233: 154–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G, Goodchild M, 1997. Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases. Geographical Analysis, 29(1): 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Snyder P, Fisher P, 1992. Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(10): 1461–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I D, Grayson R B, Ladson A B, 1991. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrological Process, 5(1): 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Sarjakoski T, 2005a. Error propagation analysis of DEM-based drainage basin delineation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(14): 3085–3102. DOI: 10.1080/01431160500057947

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Sarjakoski T, 2005b. Error propagation of DEM-based surface derivatives. Computers & Geoscience, 31: 1015–1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Guoan, Gong Jianya, Chen Zhengjiang et al., 2001. A simulation on the accuracy of DEM terrain representation. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 30(4): 361–365. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Guoan, Zhao Mudan, Cao Han, 2000. An investigation of the spatial structure of DEM errors. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 30(4): 349–352. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Guoan, Zhao Mudan, Li Tianwen et al., 2003. Modeling slope uncertainty derived from DEMs in Loess Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(6): 824–830. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Guangxia, Zhu Changqing, Shi Wenzhong et al., 2004. The further study on the accuracy of DEM terrain representation. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 33(2): 168–173. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler S P, 2000. Effect of DEM uncertainty on topographic parameters, DEM scale and terrain evaluation. New York: State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Lihua, Guo Shenglian, 2004. Effects of the catchment runoff coefficient on the performance of TOPMODEL in rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Processes, 18: 1823–1836. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40171015)

Biography: WANG Peifa (1980–), male, a native of Changqing of Shandong Province, Ph.D. candidate, specialized in GIS and RS applications.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, P., Du, J., Feng, X. et al. Effect of uncertainty of grid DEM on TOPMODEL: Evaluation and analysis. Chin. Geograph.Sc. 16, 320–326 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0320-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0320-y

Keywords

Navigation