Skip to main content

Table 4 Cross-correlation, \(\rho\), between verbal cues and gyroscope movement, ITR, number of false alarms, and false alarm rate for the 30 overground walking tests performed

From: Brain–computer interfaces for human gait restoration

Performance criterion Average Standard deviation Best
\(\rho\) 0.775 0.164 0.987
Lag (s) 2.861 4.229 2.742
ITR (bit/s) 2.298 0.904 3.676
FA 2.333 2.073 0
FA rate (FA/s) 0.043 0.039 0
  1. The best session results (on the 9th visit) are shown in the last column. No omissions occurred during any overground walking test
Back to article page