Skip to main content
Log in

A transverse local feedback linearization approach to human head movement control

  • Published:
Control Theory and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the mid-nineteenth century, Donders had proposed that for every human head rotating away from the primary pointing direction, the rotational vectors in the direction of the corresponding axes of rotation, is restricted to lie on a surface. Donders’ intuition was that under such a restriction, the head orientation would be a function of its pointing direction. In this paper, we revisit Donders’ Law and show that indeed the proposed intuition is true for a restricted class of head-orientations satisfying a class of quadratic Donders’ surfaces, if the head points to a suitable neighborhood of the frontal pointing direction. Moreover, on a suitably chosen subspace of the 3D rotation group SO(3), we describe a head movement dynamical system with input control signals that are the three external torques on the head provided by muscles. Three output signals are also suitably chosen as follows. Two of the output signals are coordinates of the frontal pointing direction. The third signal measures deviation of the state vector from the Donders’ surface. We claim that the square system is locally feedback linearizable on the subspace chosen, and the linear dynamics is decomposed into parts, transverse and tangential to the Donders’ surface. We demonstrate our approach by synthesizing a tracking and path-following controller. Additionally, for different choices of the Donders’ surface parameters, head gaits are visualized by simulating different movement patterns of the head-top vector, as the head-pointing vector rotates around a circle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Robinson, The mechanics of human saccadic eye movement. The Journal of Physiology, 1964, 174(2): 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. C. Peng, T. C. Hain, B. W. Peterson. Predicting vestibular, proprioceptive, and biomechanical control strategies in normal and pathological head movements. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1999, 46(11): 1269–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. K. Ghosh, I. Wijayasinghe, S. D. Kahagalage. A geometric approach to head/eye control. IEEE Access, 2014, 2: 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Medendorp, J. Van Gisbergen, M. Horstink, et al. Donders’ law in torticollis. Journal of neurophysiology, 1999, 82(5): 2833–2838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Tweed. Three-dimensional model of the human eye-head saccadic system. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1997, 77(2): 654–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Wijayasinghe, J. Ruths, U. Büttner, et al. Potential and optimal control of human head movement using Tait-Bryan parametrization. Automatica, 2014, 50(2): 519–529.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. I. B. Wijayasinghe, E. Aulisa, U. Büttner, et al. Potential and optimal target fixating control of the human head/eye complex. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2015, 23(2): 796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. Polpitiya, W. P. Dayawansa, C. F. Martin, et al. Geometry and control of human eye movements. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2007, 52(2): 170–180.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. W. M. Boothby. An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Burlington: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. B. K. Ghosh, I. B. Wijayasinghe. Dynamics of human head and eye rotations under Donders’ constraint. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(10): 2478–2489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. Hanson. Visualizing Quaternions. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Diebel. Representing attitude: Euler angles, unit quaternions, and rotation vectors. Matrix, 2006, 58(15/16): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. D. Shuster, G. A. Natanson. Quaternion computation from a geometric point of view. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1993, 41(4): 545–556.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Novelia, O. M. O’Reilly. On geodesics of the rotation group SO(3). Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 2015, 20(6): 729–738.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Novelia, O. M. O’Reilly. On the dynamics of the eye: geodesics on a configuration manifold, motions of the gaze direction and helmholtzs theorem. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 80(3): 1303–1327.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. O. Kremmyda, S. Glasauer, L. Guerrasio, et al. Effects of unilateral midbrain lesions on gaze (eye and head) movements. Basic and Clinical Ocular Motor and Vestibular Research. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2011: 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Glasauer, M. Hoshi, U. Kempermann, et al. Three dimensional eye position and slow phase velocity in humans with downbeat nystagmus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2003, 89(1): 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O. M. O’Reilly. Intermediate Dynamics for Engineers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. N. A. Chaturvedi, A. K. Sanyal, N. H. McClamroch. Rigid-body attitude control. IEEE Control Systems, 2011, 31(3): 30–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Isidori. Nonlinear Control Systems. 3rd ed. London: Springer, 1995.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Nielsen, M. Maggiore. On local transverse feedback linearization. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2008, 47(5): 2227–2250.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. T. W. Dwyer. Exact nonlinear control of large angle rotational maneuvers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1984, 29(9): 769–774.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Bach, R. Paielli. Direct inversion of rigid-body rotational dynamics. Proceedings of the American Control Conference. New York: IEEE, 1990: 1786–1791.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Nielsen, C. Fulford, M. Maggiore. Path following using transverse feedback linearization: Application to a maglev positioning system. Automatica, 2010, 46(3): 585–590.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The second author would like to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Stefan Glasauer and Dr. Indika Wijayasinghe for their collaboration on the head movement problem, especially understanding of the Donders’ constraint.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bijoy K. Ghosh.

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Professor T. J. Tarn on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

This work was supported by the Dick and Martha Brooks Professorship to Texas Tech University.

Takafumi OKI was born in Japan in 1980. He received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from Tokyo Denki University, Japan in 2004 and 2006 respectively, and his Ph.D. degree in Mathematics from Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, U.S.A., in 2016. His primary research interests are in nonlinear feedback stabilization and tracking, linear and nonlinear optimization problems.

Bijoy K. GHOSH received his Ph.D. degree in Engineering Sciences from the Decision and Control Group of the Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, in 1983. From 1983 to 2007 Bijoy was with the Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A., where he was a Professor and Director of the Center for BioCybernetics and Intelligent Systems. Currently, he is the Dick and Martha Brooks Regents Professor of Mathematics and Statistics at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, U.S.A. He received the D. P. Eckmann award in 1988 from the American Automatic Control Council, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences Invitation Fellowship in 1997, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Invitation Fellowship in 2016, the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, Distinguished Visiting Professorship in 2016. He became a Fellow of the IEEE in 2000, a Fellow of the International Federation on Automatic Control in 2014 and a Fellow of South Asia Institute of Science and Engineering in 2016. Bijoy had held visiting positions at Tokyo Institute of Technology, Osaka University and Tokyo Denki University, Japan, University of Padova in Italy, Royal Institute of Technology and Institut Mittag-Leffler, Stockholm, Sweden, Yale University, U.S.A., Technical University of Munich, Germany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China and Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India. Bijoy’s current research interest is in BioMechanics, Cyberphysical Systems and Control Problems in Rehabilitation Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oki, T., Ghosh, B.K. A transverse local feedback linearization approach to human head movement control. Control Theory Technol. 15, 288–300 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-017-7034-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-017-7034-9

Keywords

Navigation