Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering cybernetics: 60 years in the making

  • Published:
Control Theory and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2016

Abstract

The landmark book of Hsue-Shen Tsien, ‘Engineering Cybernetics’, gave birth 60 years ago to an engineering science of interrelations and synthetic behaviors. Clothing the bare bones of Norbert Wiener’s conception of cybernetics, the book delineates for the new science the requirement (of having direct impacts on engineering applications), the aim (of encapsulating engineering principles and concepts), the problems (of analysis, design, and uncertainty), the tools (of basic and advanced mathematics), and the scope (systems that are single input and output or multiple input and output, linear or nonlinear, deterministic or stochastic). The book is a showcase of originality, critical thinking and foresights. In particular, the author calls into question the basic assumption that ‘the properties and characteristics of the system to be controlled were always assumed to be known’ and points out that, in reality, ‘large unpredictable variations of the system properties may occur’. Sixty years later, the full spectrum of Tsien’s prophetic ideas is yet to be fully grasped and engineering cybernetics, as Tsien envisioned, is still in the making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. S. Tsien. Engineering Cybernetics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. J. Åström, P. R. Kumar. Control: a perspective. Automatica, 2014, 50(1): 3–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Wines. Qian Xuesen, father of china’s space program, dies at 98. New York Times, 2009, 11(3).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. C. Adamson Jr. Feedback. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2010, 30(3): 12, 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. K. Cohen. F. E. Marble Interviewed by Shirley K. Cohen. Pasadena, California, January-March, 1994, April 21, 1995. Oral History Project, California Institute of Technology Archives: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechOH:OH_Marble_F.

  6. D. Q. Mayne. Personal impressions of the dawn of modern control. European Journal of Control, 2007, 13(1): 61–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Wiener. Cybnetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. C. Ho. Education of control engineer — lessons I have learned. IEEE Control System Magazine, 1990, 10(3): 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. E. Kalman. On the general theory of control systems. IRE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1959, 4(3): 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. E. Kalman. Canonical structure of linear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1962, 48(4): 596–600.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Trinks. Govenors and Governing of Prime Movers. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. R. Moore. Combination open-cycle closed-cycle systems. Proceedings of the IRE, 1951, 39(11): 1421–1432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Boksenbon, D. Novik, H. Heppler. Optimum Controllers for Linear Closed-loop Systems. Cleveland: NASA Glenn Research Center, 1953: No. NACA-TN-2939.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Graham, L. C. Richard. The synthesis of ‘optimum’transient response: criteria and standard forms. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers — Part II: Applications and Industry, 1953, 72(5): 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. C. Doyle. Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1978, 23(4): 756–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Afolabi. Catastrophes in Control Systems. Indianapolis: Darsaki Publications, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Tan, W. H. Moase, C. Manzie, et al. Extremum seeking from 1922 to 2010. Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 2010: 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Black. Stabilized feedback amplifiers. Bell System Technical Journal, 1934, 13(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Gao. On the foundation of active disturbance rejection control. Control Theory & Applications, 2013, 30(12): 1498–1510.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z. Gao. On the centrality of disturbance rejection in automatic control. ISA Transactions, 2013: DOI 10.1016/j.isatra.2013. 09.012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Han. Auto-disturbance-rejection controller and its applications. Control and Decision, 1998, 13(1): 19–23 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Han. From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2009, 56(3): 900–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Han. Control theory: the doctrine of model or the doctrine of control? System Science and Mathematics, 1989, 9(4): 328–335 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Han. A class of extended state observers for uncertain systems. Control and Decision, 1995, 10(1): 85–88 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Texas Instruments Incorporated. Achieve improved motion and efficiency for advanced motor control designs in minutes with TI’s new InstaSPIN(TM)-MOTION technology. The Wall Street Journal, 2013, 4(18): http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130418-907338.html.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Texas Instruments Incorporated. TMS320F28069M, TMS320F28-068M InstaSPINTM-MOTION Software Technical Reference Manual. Literature number: SPRUHJ0A. 2013: http://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/ug/zhcu082a/zhcu082a.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. D. Braatz. Control science or control engineering? IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2013, 33(3): 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. C. Willems. The behavioral approach to open and interconnected systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2007, 27(6): 46–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiqiang Gao.

Additional information

Zhiqiang GAO received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 1990 and has taught at Cleveland State University ever since. Faced with ever widening chasm between control theory and practice, Dr. Gao returned to the roots of controls by collaborating extensively with engineers at NASA and industry in solving real world problems, from which the foundation and authenticity of research were rebuilt. Collaborating with Prof. Jingqing Han, Dr. Gao worked quietly on active disturbance rejection control for over 15 years, nurturing it from its early, conceptual stage to a maturing and emerging industrial control technology. In doing so, he made an obscure idea clear and established firmly a general design principle in dealing with uncertainties in industrial settings, often with staggering improvements in performance and energy saving. Asking basic, rudimentary question in research and in teaching, Dr. Gao and his team find creative solutions in practice and vitality in education. Dr. Gao’s research and teaching materials can be found at http://cact.csuohio.edu.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11768-016-5146-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Z. Engineering cybernetics: 60 years in the making. Control Theory Technol. 12, 97–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-014-4031-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-014-4031-0

Keywords

Navigation