Skip to main content
Log in

The combination prediction of transmembrane regions based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence

  • Published:
Journal of Electronics (China)

Abstract

Transmembrane proteins are some special and important proteins in cells. Because of their importance and specificity, the prediction of the transmembrane regions has very important theoretical and practical significance. At present, the prediction methods are mainly based on the physicochemical property and statistic analysis of amino acids. However, these methods are suitable for some environments but inapplicable for other environments. In this paper, the multi-sources information fusion theory has been introduced to predict the transmembrane regions. The proposed method is test on a data set of transmembrane proteins. The results show that the proposed method has the ability of predicting the transmembrane regions as a good performance and powerful tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Topiol and M. Sabio. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region. Biochemical Pharmacology, 78(2009)1, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kyte and R. F. Doolittle. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. Journal of Molecular Biology, 157(1982)1, 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. von Heijne. Membrane protein structure prediction: hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. Journal of Molecular Biology, 225(1992)2, 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Deng, Q. Liu, and Y. X. Li. Prediction of transmembrane segments based on fuzzy cluster analysis of amino acids. Acta Chimica Sinica, 62(2004)19, 1968–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Deng. TSFSOM: transmembrane segments prediction by fuzzy self-organizing map. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3973(2006), 728–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Q. Liu, Y. S. Zhu, B. H. Wang, and Y. X. Li. A HMM-based method to predict the transmembrane regions of beta-barrel membrane proteins. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 27(2003)1, 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Deng, Q. Liu, and Y. X. Li. Scoring hidden Markov models to discriminate beta-barrel membrane proteins. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 28(2004)3, 189–194.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Bernsel, H. Viklund, A. Hennerdal, and A. Elofsson. TOPCONS: consensus prediction of membrane protein topology. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(2009), 465–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. I. K. Kitsas, L. J. Hadjileontiadis, and S. M. Panas. Transmembrane helix prediction in proteins using hydrophobicity properties and higher-order statistics. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 38(2008)8, 867–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Hennerdal and A. Elofsson. Rapid membrane protein topology prediction. Bioinformatics, 27(2011)9, 1322–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Wei and C. A. Floudas. Enhanced inter-helical residue contact prediction in transmembrane proteins. Chemical Engineering Science, 66(2011)19, 4356–4369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Deng, X. Su, D. Wang, and Q. Li. Target recognition based on fuzzy dempster data fusion method. Defence Science Journal, 60(2010)5, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Deng, W. Jiang, and R. Sadiq. Modelling contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks: a new similarity-based DST method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(2011)1, 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Deng and F. T. S. Chan. A new fuzzy dempster MCDM method and its application in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(2011)8, 9854–9861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Deng, F. T. S. Chan, Y. Wu, and D. Wang. A new linguistic MCDM method based on multiple-criterion data fusion. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(2011)6, 6985–6993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Dempster. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, 38(1967)2, 325–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Shafer. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, USA, Princeton University Press, 1976.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Smets and R. Kennes. The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence, 66(1994)3, 191–243.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Hofmann and W. Stoffel. TMbase-A database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler, 374(1993), 166.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. E. Tusnady and I. Simon. Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: applications to topology prediction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 283(1998)2, 489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Moller, E. V. Kriventseva, and R. Apweiler. A collection of well characterized integral membrane proteins. Bioinformatics, 16(2000)12, 1159–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Deng.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60874105, 61174022), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-08-0345), and the Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (No. CSCT, 2010BA2003).

Communication author: Deng Yong, born in 1975, male, Professor.

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, X., Xu, P. & Deng, Y. The combination prediction of transmembrane regions based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. J. Electron.(China) 29, 142–147 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-012-0797-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-012-0797-8

Key words

CLC index

Navigation