Skip to main content
Log in

Gaussian principle components for nonlocal means image denoising

  • Published:
Journal of Electronics (China)

Abstract

NonLocal Means (NLM), taking fully advantage of image redundancy, has been proved to be very effective in noise removal. However, high computational load limits its wide application. Based on Principle Component Analysis (PCA), Principle Neighborhood Dictionary (PND) was proposed to reduce the computational load of NLM. Nevertheless, as the principle components in PND method are computed directly from noisy image neighborhoods, they are prone to be inaccurate due to the presence of noise. In this paper, an improved scheme for image denoising is proposed. This scheme is based on PND and uses preprocessing via Gaussian filter to eliminate the influence of noise. PCA is then used to project those filtered image neighborhood vectors onto a lower-dimensional space. With the preprocessing process, the principle components computed are more accurate resulting in an improved denoising performance. A comparison with some NLM based and state-of-art denoising methods shows that the proposed method performs well in terms of Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) as well as image visual fidelity. The experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing methods both subjectively and objectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. L. P. Yaroslavsky. Digital Signal Processing — An Introduction. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1985, 377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Buades, B. Coll, and J. M. Morel. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, June 20–26, 2005, 60–65.

  3. A. Buades, B. Coll, and J. M. Morel. On image denoising methods. Technical Note, CMLA (Centre de Mathematiques et de Leurs Applications), No. 5, 2004, 1–40.

  4. A. Buades, B. Coll, and J. M. Morel. Denoising image sequences does not require motion estimation. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, Italy, 16–20, 2005, 70–74.

  5. C. Kervrann and J. Boulanger. Optimal spatial adaptation for patch-based image denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(2006)10, 2866–2878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mahmoudi and G. Sapiro. Fast image and video denoising via non-local means of similar neighborhoods. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(2005)12, 839–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. L. Liu, J. Wang, and X. Chen. A robust and fast non-local means algorithm for image denoising. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 23(2008) 2, 270–279.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, et al. Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(2007)8, 2080–2095.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Zhang, R. Lukac, X. Wu, and D. Zhang. PCA-based spatially adaptive denoising of CFA images for single-sensor digital cameras. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18(2009)4, 797–812.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. D. Muresan and T. W. Parks. Adaptive principal components and image denoising. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Barcelona, Spain, Sept. 14–17, 2003, 101–104.

  11. T. Tasdizen. Principal components for non-local means image denoising. In Proceedings of International Conference of Image Processing, San Diego, Oct. 12–15, 2008, 1728–1731.

  12. Tolga Tasdizen. Principal Neighborhood Dictionaries for Nonlocal Means Image Denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18(2009)12, 2649–2660.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Mahmoudi and G. Sapiro. Fast image and video denoising via non-local means of similar neighborhoods. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 12(2005)12, 839–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. P. Awate and R. T. Whitaker. Higher-order image statistics for unsupervised, information-theoretic, adaptive, image filtering. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, California, June 20–26, 44–51.

  15. C. Kervrann and J. Boulanger. Unsupervised patch-based image regularization and representation. Europeon Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, May 7–13, 2006, 555–567.

  16. S. P. Awate, T. Tasdizen, and R. T. Whitaker. Unsupervised texture segmentation with nonparametric neighborhood statistics. Europeon Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, Austria, May 7–13, 2006. 494–507.

  17. S. Haykin. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1999, 123–143.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Fukunaga. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. 2nd ed., New York, Academic, 1991, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Huang and D. Mumford. Statistics of natural images and models. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Kyoto, Sept. 20–25, 1999, 541–547.

  20. A. Lee, K. Pedersen, and D. Mumford. The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images. International Journal of Computer Vision, 54(2003) 1–3, 83–103.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Sendur and I. W. Selesnick. Bivariate shrinkage functions for wavelet-based denoising exploiting interscale dependency. IEEE Transanctions on Signal Processing, 50(2002)11, 2744–2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. I. W. Selesnick, R. G. Baraniuk, and N. G. Kingsbury. The dual-tree complex wavelet transform. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 22(2005)6, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Kiefer. Sequential minimax search for a maximum. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 4(1953)3, 502–506.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Wang. Demo images and free software for’ a universal image quality index’. http://www.cns.nyu.edu/~zwang/files/research/quality_index/demo.html.

  25. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(2004)4, 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangping Li.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60776795, 60736043, 60902031, and 60805012), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 200807010004, 20070701023), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. JY10000902028).

Communication author: Li Xiangping, born in 1987, female, Master Degree.

About this article

Cite this article

Li, X., Wang, X. & Shi, G. Gaussian principle components for nonlocal means image denoising. J. Electron.(China) 28, 539–547 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-012-0723-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11767-012-0723-0

Key words

CLC index

Navigation