Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyse mathematical models used in environmental modelling. Following a brief survey of the development in modelling scale-and time-dependent dispersion processes in the environment, this paper compares three similarity solutions, one of which is a solution of the generalized Feller equation (GF) with fractal parameters, and the other two for the newly-developed generalized Fokker-Planck equation (GFP). The three solutions are derived with parameters having physical significance. Data from field experiments are used to verify the solutions. The analyses indicate that the solutions of both GF and GFP represent the physically meaningful natural processes, and simulate the realistic shapes of tracer breakthrough curves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry D A, Sposito G. Analytical solution of a convection-dispersion model with time-dependent transport coefficients, Water Resour Res, 1989, 25: 2407–2416.
Barry D A. Time dependence of solute dispersion in aquifers. In: R Fell, T Phillips and C Gerrard eds, Geomechanical Management of Waste and Contamination, Rotterdam: Balkema, 1993, 329–334.
Batchelor G K. Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence, II, The relative motion of particles, Proc Cambridge Phil Soc, 1952, 48: 345–362.
Bear J. On the tensor form of dispersion, J Geophys Res, 1961, 66: 1185–1197.
Bear J, Verruijt A. Modelling groundwater flow and pollution, Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company, 1987.
Carslaw H S, Jaeger J C. Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed, Clarendon: Oxford University Press, 1959.
Crank J A. Theoretical investigation of the influence of molecular relaxation and internal stress on diffusion in polymers, J Polymer Sci, 1953, 11(2): 151–168.
Day P R. Dispersion of a moving salt water boundary, Trans Amer Geophys Un, 1956, 37:595–601.
de Josselin de Jong G. Longitudinal and transverse diffusion in granular deposits, Trans Amer Geophys Un, 1958, 39: 67–74.
de Marsily G. Quantitative hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers, California, San Diego: Academic Press, 1986.
Dieulin A, Matheron G, de Marsily G, et al. Time dependence of an “equivalent dispersion coefficient” for transport in porous media, In: A Verruijt, F B J Barends eds, Proc Euromech, 143, Rotterdam: Balkema, 1981, 199–202.
Frisch H L, Wang T T, Kwei T K. Diffusion in glassy polymers, J Polymer Sci, Part A-2, 1969, 7: 879–887.
Frisch U. Turbulence: The Legacy of A N Kolmogorov, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Gelhar L W, Mantoglou A, Welty C, et al. A review of field scale physical solute transport processes in saturated and unsaturated porous media, Rep EA-4190, Calif, Palo Alto: Electro Power Res Inst, 1985.
Gelhar L W, Welty C, Rehfeldt K R. A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers, Water Resour Res, 1992, 28(7): 1955–1974.
Graf W H. Hydraulics of Sediment Transport, Colorado, Littleton: Water Resour Publ, 1984, 513.
Hentschel H G E, Procaccia I. Relative diffusion in turbulent media: The fractal dimension of clouds, Phys Rev A, 1984, 29: 1461–1470.
Klafter J, Bluman A, Shlesinger M F. Stochastic pathway to anomalous diffusion, Phys Rev A, 1987, 35, 3081–3085.
Kolmogorov A N. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds number, SSSR Dokl Akad Nauk, 1941a, 30: 9–13.
Kolmogorov A N. On degeneration (decay) of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible viscous liquid, SSSR Dokl Akad Nauk, 1941b, 31: 538–540.
Kolmogorov A N. Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence, SSSR Dokl Akad Nauk, 1941c, 32: 16–18.
Lallemand-Barrs A, Peaudecerf P. Recherch des relations entre les valeurs mesures de la dispersivit macroscopique d’un millieu aquifre, ses autres caractristiques, et les conditions de mesure, Bull Bur Rech Geol Min Fr, Sect, 1978, 3(4): 277–284.
Lehnigk, S H. The generalized Feller equation and related topics, England, Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1993.
Leibenzon L S. Gas movement in a porous medium (in Russian), Neft i Slants Khoz, 1929, 10:497–519.
Lovejoy S. Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas, Science, 1982, 216: 185–187.
Muralidhar R, Ramkrishna D. Diffusion in pore fractals: A review of linear response models, Transp Porous Media, 1993, 13: 79–95.
Muskat M. The flow of homogeneous fluids through porous media, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1937.
Nikolaevskii V N, Konvektivnaya diffusiya v poristykh sredakh Prikl Mat Mekh, 1959, 23: 1042–1050.
O’shaughnessy B, Procaccia I. Analytical solutions for diffusion on fractal objects, Phys Rev Lett, 1985, 54: 455–458.
Pang L, Hunt B. Solutions and verification of a scale dependent dispersion model, J Contam Hydrol, 2001, 53: 21–29.
Philip J R. Theory of infiltration, Adv Hydrosci,1969, 5: 215–296.
Philip J R. Issues in flow and transport in heterogeneous porous media, Transp Porous Media, 1986, 1: 319–338.
Pickens J F, Grisak G E. Modeling of scale-dependent dispersion in hydrogeologic systems, Water Resour Res, 1981, 17: 1701–1711.
Richardson L F. Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph, Proc Roy Soc London Ser A, 1926, 110: 709–737.
Risken H. The Fokker-Planck equation, 2nd ed, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
Saffman P G. A theory of dispersion in a porous medium, J Fluid Mech, 1959, 6: 321–349.
Scheidegger A E. Statistical hydrodynamics in porous media, J Appl Phys, 1954, 25: 994–1001.
Scheidegger A E. General theory of dispersion in porous media, J Geophys Res,1961, 66: 3273–3278.
Scheidegger A E. Statistical hydrodynamics in porous media, Adv Hydrosci,1964, 1: 161–181.
Slichter C S. Field measurement of the rate of movement of underground waters, USGS Water Supply Paper, 1905, 140.
Stephenson J. Some non-linear diffusion equations and fractal diffusion, Physica A, 1995, 222:234–247.
Su N H. Development of the Fokker-Planck equation and its solutions for modeling transport of conservative and reactive solutes in physically heterogeneous media, Water Resour Res, 1995, 31(12): 3025–3032.
Su N H. Extension of the Feller Fokker Planck equation to two and three dimensions for modeling solute transport in fractal porous media, Water Resour Res, 1997, 33(5): 1195–1197.
Su N H, Sander G C, Liu F, et al. Similarity solutions for solute transport in fractal porous media with a time-and scale-dependent dispersivity, Applied Math Model, 2005, 29(9): 852–870.
Taylor G I. Diffusion by continuous movements, Proc London Math Soc, 1921, 20: 196–211.
Taylor G I. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube, Proc Royal Soc London A, 1953, 219: 186–203.
Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. Reply to J R Philip’s comment on “An explanation of scaledependent dispersivity in heterogeneous aquifers using concepts of fractal geometry” Water Resour Res, 1992, 28(5): 1487–1490.
Wang T T, Kwei T K, Frisch H L. Diffusion in glassy polymers, III, J Polymer Sci, Part A-2, 1969, 7: 2019–2028.
Wheatcraft S W, Tyler S W. An explanation of scale-dependent dispersivity in heterogeneous aquifers using concepts of fractal geometry, Water Resour Res, 1988, 24(4): 566–578.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the NNSF of China (30570426), Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (101004) and the Youth Foundation of Educational Department of Hunan Province in China (05B007).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Su, N. Scale and time effects on mathematical models for transport in the environment. Appl. Math. Chin. Univ. 22, 267–276 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-007-0303-5
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-007-0303-5