Abstract
This paper employs a stochastic endogenous growth model extended to the case of a recursive utility function which can disentangle intertemporal substitution from risk aversion to analyze productive government expenditure and optimal fiscal policy, particularly stresses the importance of factor income. First, the explicit solutions of the central planner's stochastic optimization problem are derived, the growth-maximizing and welfare-maximizing government expenditure policies are obtained and their standing in conflict or coincidence depends upon intertemporal substitution. Second, the explicit solutions of the representative individual's stochastic optimization problem which permits to tax on capital income and labor income separately are derived, and it is found that the effect of risk on growth crucially depends on the degree of risk aversion, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution and the capital income share. Finally, a flexible optimal tax policy which can be internally adjusted to a certain extent is derived, and it is found that the distribution of factor income plays an important role in designing the optimal tax policy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barro R J. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5):103–125.
Turnovsky S J, Productive government expenditure in a stochastically growing economy, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1999, 3:544–570.
Epstein L, Zin S. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns, an empirical analysis, Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 99:263–286.
Weil P. Non-expected utility in macroeconomics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990, 105:29–42.
Obstfeld M. Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth, American Ecnomic Review, 1994, 84:1310–1329.
Corsetti G. A portfolio approach to endogenous growth: equilibrium and optimal policy, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997, 21:1627–1644.
Epaulard A, Pommeret A. Recursive utility, endogenous growth, and the welfare cost of volatility, Review of Economic Dynamics, 2003, 6:672–684.
Gong L. Direct preferences for wealth, the risk premium puzzle, growth, and policy effectiveness, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2002, 26:247–270.
Smith T R. Cyclical uncertainty, precautionary saving and economic growth, Economica, 1996, 63:477–494.
Turnovsky S J. On the role of government in a stochastically growing open economy, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 1999, 23:873–908.
Turnovsky S J. Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2000, 45:185–210.
Turnovsky S J. Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
Turnovsky S J. Intertemporal substitution, risk aversion, and economic performance in a stochastically growing open economy, Journal of International Money and Finance, 2003, 22:529–556.
Turnovsky S J. Volatility and growth in developing economics: some numerical results and empirical evidence, Journal of International Economics, 2003, 59:267–295.
Yang Y. The spirit of capitalism, non-expected utility and asset pricing, Acta Mathematica Scientia, 1999, 19(4):409–416.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70271069).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haijun, W., Shigeng, H. & Xueqing, Z. Recursive utility, productive government expenditure and optimal fiscal policy. Appl. Math. Chin. Univ. 20, 277–288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-005-0003-y
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-005-0003-y