Skip to main content
Log in

Recursive utility, productive government expenditure and optimal fiscal policy

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper employs a stochastic endogenous growth model extended to the case of a recursive utility function which can disentangle intertemporal substitution from risk aversion to analyze productive government expenditure and optimal fiscal policy, particularly stresses the importance of factor income. First, the explicit solutions of the central planner's stochastic optimization problem are derived, the growth-maximizing and welfare-maximizing government expenditure policies are obtained and their standing in conflict or coincidence depends upon intertemporal substitution. Second, the explicit solutions of the representative individual's stochastic optimization problem which permits to tax on capital income and labor income separately are derived, and it is found that the effect of risk on growth crucially depends on the degree of risk aversion, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution and the capital income share. Finally, a flexible optimal tax policy which can be internally adjusted to a certain extent is derived, and it is found that the distribution of factor income plays an important role in designing the optimal tax policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barro R J. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5):103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Turnovsky S J, Productive government expenditure in a stochastically growing economy, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1999, 3:544–570.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein L, Zin S. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns, an empirical analysis, Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 99:263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weil P. Non-expected utility in macroeconomics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990, 105:29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Obstfeld M. Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth, American Ecnomic Review, 1994, 84:1310–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corsetti G. A portfolio approach to endogenous growth: equilibrium and optimal policy, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997, 21:1627–1644.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Epaulard A, Pommeret A. Recursive utility, endogenous growth, and the welfare cost of volatility, Review of Economic Dynamics, 2003, 6:672–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gong L. Direct preferences for wealth, the risk premium puzzle, growth, and policy effectiveness, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2002, 26:247–270.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith T R. Cyclical uncertainty, precautionary saving and economic growth, Economica, 1996, 63:477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turnovsky S J. On the role of government in a stochastically growing open economy, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 1999, 23:873–908.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Turnovsky S J. Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 2000, 45:185–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Turnovsky S J. Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turnovsky S J. Intertemporal substitution, risk aversion, and economic performance in a stochastically growing open economy, Journal of International Money and Finance, 2003, 22:529–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Turnovsky S J. Volatility and growth in developing economics: some numerical results and empirical evidence, Journal of International Economics, 2003, 59:267–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y. The spirit of capitalism, non-expected utility and asset pricing, Acta Mathematica Scientia, 1999, 19(4):409–416.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (70271069).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haijun, W., Shigeng, H. & Xueqing, Z. Recursive utility, productive government expenditure and optimal fiscal policy. Appl. Math. Chin. Univ. 20, 277–288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-005-0003-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-005-0003-y

MR Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation