Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Mixed methods appraisal of the studies

From: The unmet needs of gay and bisexual men following prostate cancer treatment: an integrative literature review

1. Qualitative

Capistrant et al., (2016)

Doran et al., (2018)

Jagervall et al., (2019)

Lee et al., (2015)

McConkey and Holborn., (2018)

West et al., (2021)

1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4. Quantitative descriptive

Allensworth-Davies et al., (2013)

Amarasekera et al., (2020)

Dowsett et al., (2014)

Lee et al., (2013)

Simon Rosser et al., (2019)

Wassersug et al., (2013)

Wheldon et al., (2022)

4.1. Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4.2. Is the sample representative of the target population?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4.3. Are the measurements appropriate?

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

4.4. Is the risk of nonresponse bias low?

Y

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

4.5. Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?

Y

Y

Y

Not enough data collected

Y

Y

Y

5. Mixed Methods

Mehta et al., (2019)

Rose et al., (2017)

Ussher et al., (2017)

5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question?

Y

Can’t tell

Y

5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?

Y

Y

Y

5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?

Y

Y

Y

5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?

Y

Y

Y

5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?

Y

Y

Y