Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cardiovascular disease prevention and management of pre-existent cardiovascular disease in a cohort of prostate cancer survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a common cause of mortality among men with prostate cancer. However, receipt of preventive care and management of pre-existent CVD has not been well studied in prostate cancer survivors.

Methods

This study examined a prospective cohort of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2011 and 2013 throughout North Carolina linked to Medicare and private insurance claims and clinical data from the Veterans Affairs (VA). In patients without pre-existent CVD, the primary outcome was a composite measure of annual preventive care (blood glucose screening, cholesterol level testing, and ≥ 1 primary care provider visit). In patients with pre-existent CVD, the primary outcome was annual cardiologist visit; blood glucose, cholesterol level testing, and primary care visits were also assessed.

Results

Our sample comprised 492 patients successfully linked to insurance claims and/or VA data, among whom 103 (20.9%) had pre-existent CVD. Receipt of preventive care declined from 52.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7 to 57.6%) during the first year after prostate cancer diagnosis to 40.8% (95% CI: 33.7 to 48.4%) during the third year. Among patients with pre-existent CVD, only 23.4% (95% CI: 13.6 to 37.2%) visited a cardiologist in all 3 years. Black men were more likely than White men to visit a cardiologist the first year (risk ratio [RR] = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.71).

Conclusion

In a population-based cohort of prostate cancer survivors, receipt of CVD preventive care declined over time, and frequency of cardiologist-led management of pre-existent CVD was low.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

There is a need to improve clinical strategies for reducing cardiovascular risk and managing pre-existent CVD in prostate cancer survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data underlying this study are not available to other researchers due to policies of the data providers regarding data access and sharing.

References

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shikanov S, Kocherginsky M, Shalhav AL, Eggener SE. Cause-specific mortality following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012;15(1):106–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2011.55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinthus JH, Shayegan B, Klotz L, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors among prostate cancer patients treated with and without androgen deprivation. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(6_suppl):364. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.6_suppl.364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes JA, Anderson RF, Hoffman LG, et al. Cardiovascular preventive care and coordination of care in prostate cancer survivors: a multi-institutional prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103(1):112–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survival: lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen RC, Carpenter WR, Kim M, et al. Design of the North Carolina prostate cancer comparative effectiveness and survivorship study (NC ProCESS). J Comp Eff Res. 2015;4(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer.14.67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017;317(11):1141–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Rural Urban Continuum Codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes. Accessed 6 March 2019 

  9. Meyer A-M, Olshan AF, Green L, et al. Big data for population-based cancer research: the integrated cancer information and surveillance system. N C Med J. 2014;75(4):265–9. https://doi.org/10.18043/ncm.75.4.265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dusetzina SB, Tyree S, Meyer AM, Meyer A, Green L, Carpenter WR. Linking data for health services research: a framework and instructional guide. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.

  11. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Statin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;316(19):1997–2007. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.15450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–646. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Armenian SH, Lacchetti C, Barac A, et al. Prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(8):893–911. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.5400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):73–84. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson EB. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc. 1927;22(158):209–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. American College of Cardiology. ASCVD risk estimator plus. October 2021. Accessed April 12, 2022. https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus/#!/calculate/estimate

  17. Sun L, Parikh RB, Hubbard RA, et al. Assessment and management of cardiovascular risk factors among us veterans with prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2): e210070. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0070.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moses KA, Orom H, Brasel A, Gaddy J, Underwood W 3rd. Racial/ethnic disparity in treatment for prostate cancer: does cancer severity matter? Urology. 2017;99:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dess RT, Hartman HE, Mahal BA, et al. Association of Black race with prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(7):975–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0826.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Underwood W 3rd, Jackson J, Wei JT, et al. Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999. Cancer. 2005;103(3):538–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maganty A, Sabik LM, Sun Z, et al. Under treatment of prostate cancer in rural locations. J Urol. 2020;203(1):108–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baldwin L-M, Andrilla CHA, Porter MP, Rosenblatt RA, Patel S, Doescher MP. Treatment of early-stage prostate cancer among rural and urban patients. Cancer. 2013;119(16):3067–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang C, Lei X, Smith GL, et al. Influence of geography on prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(5):1286–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rifas-Shiman SL, Forman JP, Lane K, Caspard H, Gillman MW. Diabetes and lipid screening among patients in primary care: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiefer MM, Silverman JB, Young BA, Nelson KM. National patterns in diabetes screening: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2012. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(5):612–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3147-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Banerjee ES, Shaak K, Burgess N, Johnson M, Careyva B. Factors associated with clinician adherence to USPSTF diabetes screening recommendations. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021;12:21501327211016580. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211016579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grant DSL, Scott RD, Harrison TN, et al. Trends in lipid screening among adults in an integrated health care delivery system, 2009–2015. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24(11):1090–101. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2018.18100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gillespie CD, Keenan NL, Miner JB, Hong Y. Screening for lipid disorders among adults–National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Suppl. 2012;61(2):26–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) at the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System for their support.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute On Minority Health And Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health (R21MD012465) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services as part of the Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness (DEcIDE) program (contract HHSA29020050040I). Work on this study was supported by the Cancer Information and Population Health Resource, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, with funding provided by the University Cancer Research Fund via the state of North Carolina. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing, reviewing, and editing; RC: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing; DU: data curation, project administration; SD: data curation, project administration; LZ: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, supervision, writing, reviewing, and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron J. Katz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This is an observational study of existing data. The study received expedited review and approval by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Institutional Review Board of the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Conflict of interest

AJK reported receiving personal fees from Kite Pharma and Atara Biotherapeutics outside the submitted work. RCC reported receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Accuray, Bayer, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and Myovant outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Disclaimer

The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Duke University, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or the U.S. government.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 26.5 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katz, A.J., Chen, R.C., Usinger, D.S. et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention and management of pre-existent cardiovascular disease in a cohort of prostate cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 17, 351–359 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01229-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01229-5

Keywords

Navigation