Abstract
Purpose
Breast cancer (BC) patients often experience various long-term sequelae due to aggressive treatment. We analyzed and illustrated long-term trajectory during different phases of treatment and survivorship.
Methods
Data were obtained from a cohort of 298 BC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2006 and were followed up until 2020. We measured HRQoL using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and EuroQoL-5D questionnaires and conducted eight assessments right after initial diagnosis, during treatment, post-treatment, and during survivorship phases. Linear mixed model was used to assess changes in HRQoL. Overall HRQoL measured by EQ-5D index of long-term BC survivors were further compared with that of the age-matched general population.
Results
Of 298 participants, 246 women survived and 124 participated in the long-term follow-up survey (LTFU). Overall, HRQoL functions deteriorated during treatment but gradually improved between 1- and 3-year post-diagnosis and stabilized over LTFU measure. Significant recovery was observed in physical, role, emotional, social functions, and future perspectives (p < 0.05). Treatment-related acute symptoms were reported in the first year but diminished afterward, and treatment-related financial difficulties lessened. At LTFU, BC survivors reported a high level of insomnia, fatigue, and pain and appeared to have poorer overall HRQoL than the general population (mean difference, EQ-5D index: 0.073, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Through 15-year survivorship, BC survivors showed improvement in many aspects of HRQoL. However, some inferior aspects remain relevant for long-term survivors. Ongoing supportive programs concentrating on pain management, persistent cancer-related fatigue, and sleeping problems might aid enhance their HRQoL.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center. Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2017, Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2019.
Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.
Bray, F., et al., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018. 68(6): p. 394–424.
Crystal, S.D., et al., NCCN guidelines insights: survivorship, version 2.2020. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020. 18(8): p. 1016–1023.
Gradishar, W.J., et al., Breast cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020. 18(4): p. 452–478.
Runowicz CD, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):43–73.
Sagen A, et al. Changes in arm morbidities and health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery - a five-year follow-up study. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(8):1111–8.
de Ligt KM, et al. The impact of health symptoms on health-related quality of life in early-stage breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;178(3):703–11.
Small BJ, et al. Cognitive performance of breast cancer survivors in daily life: role of fatigue and depressed mood. Psychooncology. 2019;28(11):2174–80.
Yeung NCY, Lu Q, Mak WWS. Self-perceived burden mediates the relationship between self-stigma and quality of life among Chinese American breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(9):3337–45.
Wefel JS, et al. Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(14):3348–56.
Ganz PA, et al. Physical and psychosocial recovery in the year after primary treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1101–9.
Chae BJ, et al. Unmet needs and related factors of Korean breast cancer survivors: a multicenter, cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):839.
Hsu T, et al. Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3540–8.
Koch L, et al. Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors - a 10-year longitudinal population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1119–28.
Ganz PA, et al. Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(1):39–49.
Lee ES, et al. Health-related quality of life in survivors with breast cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):101–8.
Mai TTX, et al. Prognostic value of post-diagnosis health-related quality of life for overall survival in breast cancer: findings from a 10-year prospective cohort in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1600–11.
Kweon S, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):69–77.
Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.
Sprangers MA, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(10):2756–68.
EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 1990. 16(3): p. 199–208.
Yun YH, et al. Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(6):441–5.
Yun YH, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(4):863–8.
Kim MH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1401–6.
Lee YK, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1187–93.
Park JI, Baek H, Jung HH. CKD and health-related quality of life: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(6):851–60.
Fayers P, A.N., Bjordal K, EORTC QLQ scoring manual., et al. Brussels. Belgium: EORTC Publications; 2001.
Yun YH, et al. Age, sex, and comorbidities were considered in comparing reference data for health-related quality of life in the general and cancer populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1164–75.
Cocks K, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(11):1713–21.
Osoba D, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):139–44.
Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London. United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1969.
Austin PC. A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. Value Health. 2002;5(4):329–37.
Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523–32.
Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70–70.
van Leeuwen M, et al. Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):114.
Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):345–53.
Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18.
Reinertsen KV, et al. Predictors and course of chronic fatigue in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):405–14.
Bower JE, et al. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(4):743–53.
Biering K, et al. The long-term course of fatigue following breast cancer diagnosis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(1):37.
Alexander, S., et al., A comparison of the characteristics of disease-free breast cancer survivors with or without cancer-related fatigue syndrome. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2009. 45(3): p. 384–392.
Jiang C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain in cancer survivors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(8):1224–6.
Paice JA, et al. Management of chronic pain in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(27):3325–45.
Gallaway MS, et al. Pain among cancer survivors. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E54.
Otte JL, et al. Prevalence, severity, and correlates of sleep-wake disturbances in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(3):535–47.
Annunziata MA, et al. Is long-term cancer survivors’ quality of life comparable to that of the general population? An italian study Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2663–8.
Annunziata MA, et al. Long-term quality of life profile in oncology: a comparison between cancer survivors and the general population. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(2):651–6.
Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3322–30.
Kang SY, et al. Basic findings regarding breast cancer in Korea in 2015: data from a breast cancer registry. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(1):1–10.
Zeng H, et al. Female breast cancer statistics of 2010 in China: estimates based on data from 145 population-based cancer registries. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(5):466–70.
Cancer stat facts: female breast cancer. 2018; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Cancer Center of Korea (grant number NCC-04101502 and NCC-1911271) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (funded by the Korea Ministry of Science and ICT, grant number 2020R1A2C1A01011584). The funder had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Thi Xuan Mai Tran: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing — original draft; So Youn Jung: conceptualization, validation, data curation, writing — review and editing; Eun-Gyeong Lee: data curation, writing — review and editing; Heeyoun Cho: project administration, writing — review and editing; Juhee Cho: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, writing — review and editing; Eunsook Lee: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, validation, writing — review and editing; Yoon Jung Chang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, formal analysis, data curation, writing — review and editing; Hyunsoon Cho: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, formal analysis, data curation, writing — original draft.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NCC (NCCNCS-04–034 and NCC2019-0281). All patients provided written informed consent before their participation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tran, T.X.M., Jung, SY., Lee, EG. et al. Long-term trajectory of postoperative health-related quality of life in young breast cancer patients: a 15-year follow-up study. J Cancer Surviv 17, 1416–1426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01165-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01165-4