Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term trajectory of postoperative health-related quality of life in young breast cancer patients: a 15-year follow-up study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer (BC) patients often experience various long-term sequelae due to aggressive treatment. We analyzed and illustrated long-term trajectory during different phases of treatment and survivorship.

Methods

Data were obtained from a cohort of 298 BC patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2006 and were followed up until 2020. We measured HRQoL using EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and EuroQoL-5D questionnaires and conducted eight assessments right after initial diagnosis, during treatment, post-treatment, and during survivorship phases. Linear mixed model was used to assess changes in HRQoL. Overall HRQoL measured by EQ-5D index of long-term BC survivors were further compared with that of the age-matched general population.

Results

Of 298 participants, 246 women survived and 124 participated in the long-term follow-up survey (LTFU). Overall, HRQoL functions deteriorated during treatment but gradually improved between 1- and 3-year post-diagnosis and stabilized over LTFU measure. Significant recovery was observed in physical, role, emotional, social functions, and future perspectives (p < 0.05). Treatment-related acute symptoms were reported in the first year but diminished afterward, and treatment-related financial difficulties lessened. At LTFU, BC survivors reported a high level of insomnia, fatigue, and pain and appeared to have poorer overall HRQoL than the general population (mean difference, EQ-5D index: 0.073, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Through 15-year survivorship, BC survivors showed improvement in many aspects of HRQoL. However, some inferior aspects remain relevant for long-term survivors. Ongoing supportive programs concentrating on pain management, persistent cancer-related fatigue, and sleeping problems might aid enhance their HRQoL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center. Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2017, Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2019.

  2. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bray, F., et al., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018. 68(6): p. 394–424.

  5. Crystal, S.D., et al., NCCN guidelines insights: survivorship, version 2.2020. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020. 18(8): p. 1016–1023.

  6. Gradishar, W.J., et al., Breast cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2020. 18(4): p. 452–478.

  7. Runowicz CD, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):43–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sagen A, et al. Changes in arm morbidities and health-related quality of life after breast cancer surgery - a five-year follow-up study. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(8):1111–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Ligt KM, et al. The impact of health symptoms on health-related quality of life in early-stage breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;178(3):703–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Small BJ, et al. Cognitive performance of breast cancer survivors in daily life: role of fatigue and depressed mood. Psychooncology. 2019;28(11):2174–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeung NCY, Lu Q, Mak WWS. Self-perceived burden mediates the relationship between self-stigma and quality of life among Chinese American breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(9):3337–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wefel JS, et al. Acute and late onset cognitive dysfunction associated with chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(14):3348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganz PA, et al. Physical and psychosocial recovery in the year after primary treatment of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1101–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chae BJ, et al. Unmet needs and related factors of Korean breast cancer survivors: a multicenter, cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):839.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu T, et al. Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(28):3540–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch L, et al. Quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors - a 10-year longitudinal population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1119–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganz PA, et al. Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(1):39–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee ES, et al. Health-related quality of life in survivors with breast cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg. 2011;253(1):101–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mai TTX, et al. Prognostic value of post-diagnosis health-related quality of life for overall survival in breast cancer: findings from a 10-year prospective cohort in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(4):1600–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kweon S, et al. Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):69–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Aaronson NK, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sprangers MA, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three-country field study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(10):2756–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 1990. 16(3): p. 199–208.

  24. Yun YH, et al. Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(6):441–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yun YH, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(4):863–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim MH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee YK, et al. South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1187–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Park JI, Baek H, Jung HH. CKD and health-related quality of life: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(6):851–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fayers P, A.N., Bjordal K, EORTC QLQ scoring manual., et al. Brussels. Belgium: EORTC Publications; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yun YH, et al. Age, sex, and comorbidities were considered in comparing reference data for health-related quality of life in the general and cancer populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1164–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cocks K, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(11):1713–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Osoba D, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cohen J, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London. United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Austin PC. A comparison of methods for analyzing health-related quality-of-life measures. Value Health. 2002;5(4):329–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:70–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. van Leeuwen M, et al. Understanding the quality of life (QOL) issues in survivors of cancer: towards the development of an EORTC QOL cancer survivorship questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(3):345–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun Y, Shigaki CL, Armer JM. Return to work among breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):709–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Reinertsen KV, et al. Predictors and course of chronic fatigue in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(4):405–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bower JE, et al. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(4):743–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Biering K, et al. The long-term course of fatigue following breast cancer diagnosis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(1):37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Alexander, S., et al., A comparison of the characteristics of disease-free breast cancer survivors with or without cancer-related fatigue syndrome. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2009. 45(3): p. 384–392.

  44. Jiang C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain in cancer survivors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(8):1224–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Paice JA, et al. Management of chronic pain in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(27):3325–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gallaway MS, et al. Pain among cancer survivors. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020;17:E54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Otte JL, et al. Prevalence, severity, and correlates of sleep-wake disturbances in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(3):535–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Annunziata MA, et al. Is long-term cancer survivors’ quality of life comparable to that of the general population? An italian study Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(9):2663–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Annunziata MA, et al. Long-term quality of life profile in oncology: a comparison between cancer survivors and the general population. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(2):651–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3322–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kang SY, et al. Basic findings regarding breast cancer in Korea in 2015: data from a breast cancer registry. J Breast Cancer. 2018;21(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zeng H, et al. Female breast cancer statistics of 2010 in China: estimates based on data from 145 population-based cancer registries. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(5):466–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Cancer stat facts: female breast cancer. 2018; Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Cancer Center of Korea (grant number NCC-04101502 and NCC-1911271) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (funded by the Korea Ministry of Science and ICT, grant number 2020R1A2C1A01011584). The funder had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Thi Xuan Mai Tran: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing — original draft; So Youn Jung: conceptualization, validation, data curation, writing — review and editing; Eun-Gyeong Lee: data curation, writing — review and editing; Heeyoun Cho: project administration, writing — review and editing; Juhee Cho: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, writing — review and editing; Eunsook Lee: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, validation, writing — review and editing; Yoon Jung Chang: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, formal analysis, data curation, writing — review and editing; Hyunsoon Cho: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, supervision, formal analysis, data curation, writing — original draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yoon Jung Chang or Hyunsoon Cho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of NCC (NCCNCS-04–034 and NCC2019-0281). All patients provided written informed consent before their participation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, T.X.M., Jung, SY., Lee, EG. et al. Long-term trajectory of postoperative health-related quality of life in young breast cancer patients: a 15-year follow-up study. J Cancer Surviv 17, 1416–1426 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01165-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01165-4

Keywords

Navigation