Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of complementary or alternative medicine and potential interactions with chronic medications among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study explored the pattern of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer and identified potential drug-CAM interactions and factors predicting CAM use.

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited 393 survivors of childhood cancer (male, 57.8%; mean age, 17.7 [SD = 7.3] years; mean years post-treatment, 8.8 [SD = 5.0]) from a public hospital in Hong Kong. Participants reported CAM and over-the-counter medications that they used in the past year. Prescription drug data were extracted from pharmacy dispensing records. Potential interactions between concurrent CAM and chronic medications were identified from well-established CAM-drug/herb-drug interaction databases. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze associations of socio-demographic and clinical factors with CAM use.

Results

Half (n = 205/393, 52.2%) of the participants reported the use of CAM. The most popular CAMs were traditional Chinese medicine (n = 127/205, 62.0%) and natural products (n = 114/205, 55.3%). Among the 69 survivors (33.7%) concurrently using CAM and chronic medications, one-third (n = 21/69, 30.4%) were at risk of drug-CAM interactions that are of moderate significance. Adult survivors were more likely to use CAM than pediatric survivors (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–4.41). Brain tumor survivors were more likely than other solid tumor survivors to use non-oral therapies (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.01–7.72).

Conclusions

The prevalence of CAM use among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer was high. A minority of survivors had a risk of clinically significant CAM-drug interactions. Future studies should focus on survivors’ behavior and motivations for CAM use.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

As the concurrent use of CAM and chronic medications might result in interactions, healthcare providers should proactively identify such interactions and develop referral pathways to promote evidence-based integrative therapies for survivors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Code availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1572–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what’s in a name? NCCIH. 2011. https://nccih.nih.gov/health/integrative-health. Accessed on 8 Dec 2020.

  5. Kelly KM. Integrative therapies for children with hematological malignancies. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009;2009(1):307–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller PE, Vasey JJ, Short PF, Hartman TJ. Dietary supplement use in adult cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009;36(1):61–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song S, Youn J, Lee YJ, Kang M, Hyun T, Song Y, et al. Dietary supplement use among cancer survivors and the general population: a nation-wide cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. John GM, Hershman DL, Falci L, Shi Z, Tsai W, Greenlee H. Complementary and alternative medicine use among US cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(5):850–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rock CL, Newman VA, Neuhouser ML, Major J, Barnett MJ. Antioxidant supplement use in cancer survivors and the general population. J Nutr. 2004;134(11):3194S–5S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Diorio C, Lam CG, Ladas EJ, Njuguna F, Afungchwi GM, Taromina K, et al. Global use of traditional and complementary medicine in childhood cancer: a systematic review. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(6):791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shneerson C, Taskila T, Gale N, Greenfield S, Chen Y. The effect of complementary and alternative medicine on the quality of life of cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21(4):417–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mertens AC, Sencer S, Myers CD, Recklitis C, Kadan-Lottick N, Whitton J, et al. Complementary and alternative therapy use in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008;50(1):90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ndao DH, Ladas EJ, Bao Y, Cheng B, Nees SN, Levine JM, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among children, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a survey study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;35(4):281–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poon LHJ, Yu C, Peng L, Ewig CL, Zhang H, Li C, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes in Asian survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(3):374–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCune JS, Hatfield AJ, Blackburn AAR, Leith PO, Livingston RB, Ellis GK. Potential of chemotherapy-herb interactions in adult cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12(6):454–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smitherman AB, Mohabir D, Wilkins TM, Blatt J, Nichols HB, Dusetzina SB. Early post-therapy prescription drug usage among childhood and adolescent cancer survivors. J Pediatr. 2018;195:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan EW, Lau WC, Leung WK, Mok MT, He Y, Tong TS, et al. Prevention of dabigatran-related gastrointestinal bleeding with gastroprotective agents: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):586–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong MC, Jiang JY, Tang J, Lam A, Fung H, Mercer SW. Health services research in the public healthcare system in Hong Kong: an analysis of over 1 million antihypertensive prescriptions between 2004–2007 as an example of the potential and pitfalls of using routinely collected electronic patient data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8(1):138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. ATC/DDD classification (final).(ATC/DDD classification)(anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classifications and defined daily doses). WHO Drug Information. 2011;25(1):43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lexi-drugs online. Hudson (OH): Lexicomp, Inc.; 2020. http://online.lexi.com. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020. Subscription required to view.

  21. Natural Medicines. Somerville (MA): Therapeutic Research Center; 2020. https://naturalmedicines.therapeuticresearch.com. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020. Subscription required to view.

  22. About Herbs, Botanicals & Other Products. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 2020. https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/treatments/symptom-management/integrative-medicine/herbs. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020.

  23. Baxter K, Preston CL, editors. Stockley's drug interactions. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2020. https://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/stockley/current/. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020.

  24. Williamson E, Driver S, Baxter K, Claire LP, editors. Stockley's herbal medicines interactions. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2020. https://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/stockley/current/. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020.

  25. The drug–herb interaction information. Taiwan: Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2011. Available from https://dhi.cmu.edu.tw/query/. Last accessed on 10 Dec 2020.

  26. Cassileth BR, Lucarelli CD. Herb-drug interactions in oncology. PMPH-USA; 2003.

  27. A to Z List of Cancer Types. National Cancer Institute. https://www.cancer.gov/types. Accessed on 8 Dec 2020.

  28. Patients' socioeconomic status and their evaluations of primary care in Hong Kong. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):487.

  29. Wong CSM, Chan WC, Lam LCW, Law WY, Tang WY, Wong TY, et al. Living environment and psychological distress in the general population of Hong Kong. Procedia Environ Sci. 2016;36:78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Census and statistics department Hong Kong special administrative region. Thematic household survey report—report No. 26. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2005.

  31. Bours MJ, Beijer S, Winkels RM, Van Duijnhoven FJ, Mols F, Breedveld-Peters JJ, et al. Dietary changes and dietary supplement use, and underlying motives for these habits reported by colorectal cancer survivors of the Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-Term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(2):286–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pang KW. The making of Chinese medicine in Hong Kong. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies. 2018;14(1):17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoffman MC, Mulrooney DA, Steinberger J, Lee J, Baker KS, Ness KK. Deficits in physical function among young childhood cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(22):2799–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Viscuse PV, Price K, Millstine D, Bhagra A, Bauer B, Ruddy KJ. Integrative medicine in cancer survivors. Curr Opin Oncol. 2017;29(4):235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eslami M, Badkoubeh RS, Mousavi M, Radmehr H, Salehi M, Tavakoli N, et al. Oral ascorbic acid in combination with beta-blockers is more effective than beta-blockers alone in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(3):268–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sohl SJ, Borowski LA, Kent EE, Smith AW, Oakley-Girvan I, Rothman RL, et al. Cancer survivors' disclosure of complementary health approaches to physicians: the role of patient-centered communication. Cancer. 2015;121(6):900–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mao JJ, Palmer CS, Healy KE, Desai K, Amsterdam J. Complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer survivors: a population-based study. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(1):8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sibinga EM, Ottolini MC, Duggan AK, Wilson MH. Parent-pediatrician communication about complementary and alternative medicine use for children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2004;43(4):367–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lemay J, Amin A, Pacaud D. Complementary and alternative medicine use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16(8):468–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Adams D, Dagenais S, Clifford T, Baydala L, King WJ, Hervas-Malo M, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use by pediatric specialty outpatients. Pediatrics. 2013;131(2):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gottschling S, Meyer S, Längler A, Scharifi G, Ebinger F, Gronwald B. Differences in use of complementary and alternative medicine between children and adolescents with cancer in Germany: a population based survey. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61(3):488–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gagnon EM, Recklitis CJ. Parents' decision-making preferences in pediatric oncology: The relationship to health care involvement and complementary therapy use. Psychooncology. 2003;12(5):442–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schneider C, Schneider D. The practice of autonomy: patients, doctors, and medical decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haupt R, Essiaf S, Dellacasa C, Ronckers CM, Caruso S, Sugden E, et al. The ‘Survivorship Passport’ for childhood cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer. 2018;102:69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Poplack DG, Fordis M, Landier W, Bhatia S, Hudson MM, Horowitz ME. Childhood cancer survivor care: development of the Passport for Care. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11(12):740–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by grant number 03170047 from the Food and Health Bureau Hong Kong (Health and Medical Research Fund Research Fellowship). The funder had no role in study design, data collection/analysis/interpretation or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by CS Lam, YM Cheng, and HS Li. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CS Lam, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Celeste L.Y. Ewig or Yin Ting Cheung.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong–New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref. No. 2018.427).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 44 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lam, C.S., Cheng, Y.M., Li, H.S. et al. Use of complementary or alternative medicine and potential interactions with chronic medications among Chinese survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 16, 568–581 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01051-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01051-5

Keywords

Navigation