Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Testing the acceptability and feasibility of a tablet-based supportive cancer platform for patients with metastatic breast cancer

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although metastatic breast cancer (MBC) survival is improving, symptoms remain a significant burden. Returning to a cancer center for symptom management can be challenging. Technology-enabled supportive care platforms are worth exploration.

Methods

Seventeen patients with MBC were randomized to immediate or delayed start for a 3-month intervention that included daily tablet-based guideline-concordant self-care for pain, distress, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, as well as weekly calls with a patient navigator. The primary outcome was patient acceptability. We also assessed feasibility, patient satisfaction, and cost and compared between group differences for symptoms. RM-ANOVA examined between group differences over time. Hedges’ d effect sizes quantified magnitude of differences in change between immediate and delayed start.

Results

Sixty-eight percent of patients approached accepted the tablet-based intervention. Patients interacted with the tablet 48% of possible days. Patient satisfaction ranged from 83 for walking to 49% for the psychological interventions. The cost of delivering Nurse AMIE for 3 months was $570.23. Small nonsignificant improvements were found for fatigue (d=0.24). Nonsignificant, but potentially clinically meaningful, moderate reductions were found for sleep (d=0.65) and distress (d=0.74).

Discussion

A tablet-based supportive care platform that offers guideline-concordant self-care for pain, fatigue, sleep, and distress was observed to be highly acceptable and feasible for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patient satisfaction scores and initial evaluation of efficacy are promising, and the platform warrants further investigation.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Technology-based self-care is a promising option to address symptoms in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willis K, Lewis S, Ng F, Wilson L. The experience of living with metastatic breast cancer—a review of the literature. Health Care Women Int. 2015;36:514–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitz KH, Zhang X, Winkels R, Schleicher E, Mathis K, Doerksen S, et al. Developing “Nurse AMIE”: a tablet-based supportive care intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2020;29:232–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter JS, Andrykowski MA. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Psychosom Res. 1998;45:5–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999;85:1186–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:309–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, et al. Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:557–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger AM, Mooney K, Alvarez-Perez A, Breitbart WS, Carpenter KM, Cella D, et al. National comprehensive cancer n: Cancer-Related Fatigue, Version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13:1012–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agmon-Levin N, Damoiseaux J, Kallenberg C, Sack U, Witte T, Herold M, et al. International recommendations for the assessment of autoantibodies to cellular antigens referred to as anti-nuclear antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:17–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lizée T, Basch E, Trémolières P, Voog E, Domont J, Peyraga G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of web-based patient-reported outcome surveillance in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:1012–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Avon Breast Cancer Crusade

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn H. Schmitz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitz, K.H., Schleicher, E., Doerksen, S. et al. Testing the acceptability and feasibility of a tablet-based supportive cancer platform for patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Surviv 15, 410–413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01021-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01021-x

Keywords

Navigation