The delivery of oncofertility care remains challenging, and cancer patients increasingly utilize online health information to fill knowledge gaps in their fertility care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the website content of NCI-designated cancer centers to assess the quantity and quality of patient-oriented information pertaining to fertility preservation (FP).
We systematically abstracted, evaluated, and compared website content for NCI-designated cancer centers (CC) and comprehensive cancer centers (CCC) pertaining to oncofertility and fertility preservation for both male and female cancer patients. Readability of each website was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level and Flesch reading ease score.
Overall, 72% of websites mentioned the effect of cancer or cancer therapy on fertility potential. Only 56% of websites had a page devoted solely to the effect of cancer on fertility. Information for female patients was more common than for male patients (59% vs. 50%). CCC websites were more likely to include information about the effects of cancer treatment on fertility, the option for FP and details for FP methods. The majority of websites did not address risks and benefits of FP, moral and ethical considerations, or details about the success rates or costs. The median readability score correlated with a 12th grade reading level.
Patient-directed information pertaining to oncofertility and FP is inadequate on the majority of websites, and represents a gap in comprehensive cancer care and survivorship planning. Patients who rely primarily on internet-based information regarding oncofertility may not be well-informed about FP options in the critical period between cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer patients and survivors interested in future fertility should be referred to reproductive specialists, when possible, for a comprehensive discussion about fertility preservation prior to cancer therapy and fertility options after completing cancer therapy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2017. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/, based on November 2019 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. Accessed Apr 2020.
Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:902–11.
Schover L. Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;2005:2–5.
Jensen JR, Morbeck DE, Coddington CC 3rd. Fertility preservation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:45–9.
Nieman CL, Kazer R, Brannigan RE, et al. Cancer survivors and infertility: a review of a new problem and novel answers. J Support Oncol. 2006;4:171–8.
Zebrack B, Casillas J, Nohr L, et al. Fertility issues for young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-oncology. 2004;13:689–99.
Medicine PCotASfR. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:1022–33.
de Man AM, Rashedi A, Nelen W, et al. Female fertility in the cancer setting: availability and quality of online health information. Hum Fertil. 2020;23:170–80.
Halpern JA, Das A, Faw CA, et al. Oncofertility in adult and pediatric populations: options and barriers. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:S227–38.
Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Lee J-H, et al. Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5952–7.
Clayman ML, Harper MM, Quinn GP, et al. Oncofertility resources at NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2013;11:1504–9.
Poll-Franse LV, Eenbergen MCHJ. Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Support Care Cancer. 2008;2008:1189–95.
Ebel M-D, Stellamanns J, Keinki C, et al. Cancer patients and the internet: a survey among German cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 2017;2017:503–8.
Hershberger PE, Finnegan L, Altfeld S, et al. Toward theoretical understanding of the fertility preservation decision-making process: examining information processing among young women with cancer. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2013;27:257–75.
Peate M, Meiser B, Cheah BC, et al. Making hard choices easier: a prospective, multicentre study to assess the efficacy of a fertility-related decision aid in young women with early-stage breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1053–61.
Kutner MA. National Center for Education Statistics: the health literacy of America’s adults results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Vest, A.N., Kuete, N.T. & Mehta, A. Is fertility preservation a part of comprehensive cancer care in the USA? A study of NCI-designated cancer center websites. J Cancer Surviv (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00983-8
- Fertility preservation
- Cancer survivorship