Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual health problems in French cancer survivors 2 years after diagnosis—the national VICAN survey

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess French cancer survivors’ sexual health 2 years after diagnosis.

Methods

Using the French National Health Insurance System database, the representative national VICAN survey was created comprising 4349 adults (12 cancer sites), still alive 2 years after diagnosis and aged 18–52 (“younger”) or 53–82 (“older”). Sexual health was evaluated using six items from the Relationship and Sexuality Scale, and an overall indicator was created.

Results

Among the study’s 1955 sexually active participants, 18.6 % (versus 13.1 %), 39.8 % (versus 39.9 %) and 29.4 % (versus 29.8 %) of men (versus women) were affected, respectively, by “strong”, “moderate” and “weak” sexual health deterioration, while 12.2 % (versus 17.1 %) were spared sexual problems (P = 0.001). Strong deterioration more often concerned older men with prostate (27.7 %) and lung (26.1 %) cancers, younger men with upper aero-digestive tract cancers (25.2 %) and women (younger/older) with cervical cancer (24.2 %). Substantial (strong/moderate) sexual health deterioration was observed for all cancer sites, rates ranging from 68.3 % (prostate) to 37.2 % (melanoma). In all four gender/age subgroups, increasing age predicted poorer sexual health, although statistical significance was not reached in older women. Apart from genital cancer, perceived consequences, such as general sequelae and fatigue, were the primary factors associated with severe sexual problems.

Conclusions

Two years after diagnosis, the majority of sexually active French cancer survivors reported impaired sexual health. Younger and older men and women with cancer in non-reproductive sites also reported problems.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Interventions aimed at improving sexual health irrespective of age and cancer site should be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bessede T, Joly F, Lebret T. Gestion des effets secondaires des thérapies ciblées dans le cancer du rein : troubles de la sexualité. Bull Cancer. 2011;98:S127–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bredart A, Dolbeault S, Savignoni A, Besancenet C, This P, Giami A, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of sexual problems after early-stage breast cancer treatment: results of a French exploratory survey. Psychooncology. 2011;20:841–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bober SL, Varela VS. Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3712–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dizon DS, Suzin D, McIlvenna S. Sexual health as a survivorship issue for female cancer survivors. Oncologist. 2014;19:202–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou ES, Nekhlyudov L, Bober SL. The primary health care physician and the cancer patient: tips and strategies for managing sexual health. Translat Androl Urol. 2014;4:218–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brotto LA, Yule M, Breckon E. Psychological interventions for the sexual sequelae of cancer: a review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:346–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Siegel T, Moul JW, Spevak M, ALVORD WG, COSTABILE RA. The development of erectile dysfunction in men treated for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2001;165:430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Traa MJ, Vries JD, Roukema JA, Oudsten BLD. Sexual (dys)function and the quality of sexual life in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:19–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E, Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team. Feeling well and talking about sex: psycho-social predictors of sexual functioning after cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, The Australian Cancer and Sexuality Study Team. Perceived causes and consequences of sexual changes after cancer for women and men: a mixed method study. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Loe M. Sex and the senior woman: pleasure and danger in the Viagra era. Sexualities. 2004;7:303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bondil P. Vieillissement sexuel : mythes et réalités biologiques. Sexologies. 2008;17:152–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watters Y, Boyd TV. Sexuality in later life: opportunity for reflections for healthcare providers. Sex Relat Ther. 2009;24:307–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Traa MJ, Orsini RG, Oudsten BLD, Vries JD, Roukema JA, Bosman SJ, et al. Measuring the health-related quality of life and sexual functioning of patients with rectal cancer: does type of treatment matter? Int J Cancer. 2014;134:979–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Colson M-H, Lemaire A, Pinton P, Hamidi K, Klein P. Sexual behaviors and mental perception, satisfaction and expectations of sex life in men and women in France. J Sex Med. 2006;3:121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tekkis PP, Cornish JA, Remzi FH, Tilney HS, Strong SA, Church JM, et al. Measuring sexual and urinary outcomes in women after rectal cancer excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:46–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noldus J, Michl U, Graefen M, Haese A, Hammerer P, Huland H. Patient-reported sexual function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2002;42:118–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JAV, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 2004;172:2227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Janda M, Obermair A, Cella D, Crandon AJ, Trimmel M. Vulvar cancer patients’ quality of life: a qualitative assessment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:875–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Green MS, Naumann RW, Elliot M, Hall JB, Higgins RV, Grigsby JH. Sexual dysfunction following vulvectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:73–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Likes WM, Stegbauer C, Tillmanns T, Pruett J. Correlates of sexual function following vulvar excision. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:600–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Flynn KE, Jeffery DD, Keefe FJ, Porter LS, Shelby RA, Fawzy MR, et al. Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®). Psychooncology. 2011;20:378–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ussher JM, Perz J, Gilbert E, Wong WKT, Mason C, Hobbs K, et al. Talking about sex after cancer: a discourse analytic study of health care professional accounts of sexual communication with patients. Psychol Health. 2013;28:1370–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam WWT, Li WWY, Bonanno GA, Mancini AD, Chan M, Or A, et al. Trajectories of body image and sexuality during the first year following diagnosis of breast cancer and their relationship to 6 years psychosocial outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:957–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bouhnik A-D, Bendiane M-K, Cortaredona S, Teyssier LS, Rey D, Berenger C, et al. The labour market, psychosocial outcomes and health conditions in cancer survivors: protocol for a nationwide longitudinal survey 2 and 5 years after cancer diagnosis (the VICAN survey). BMJ Open. 2015;5:e005971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Berglund G, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Sjödén PO, Rutquist LE. Effect of endocrine treatment on sexuality in premenopausal breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2788–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in International Clinical Trials in Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005;114:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Assari S, Ahmadi K, Kazemi Saleh D. Gender differences in the association between lipid profile and sexual function among patients with coronary artery disease. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2014;8:9–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Assari S, Moghani Lankarani M, Ahmadi K, Kazemi Saleh D. Association between sexual function and marital relationship in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2014;9:124–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zaied S, Ben Fatma L, Laadhari A, Boudegga MZ, Hochlef M, Chabchoub I, et al. Study of sexuality among Tunisian women in remission from non-metastatic breast cancer, about 100 women. Bull Cancer. 2013;100:689–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ward JH. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58:236–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bell ML, Butow PN, Goldstein D. Informatively missing quality of life and unmet needs sex data for immigrant and Anglo-Australian cancer patients and survivors. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2757–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bergmark K, Åvall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Daniel A, Haddow S. Erectile dysfunction after prostate cancer. Clinical Advis. 2011;14:64–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dizon DS. Quality of life after breast cancer: survivorship and sexuality. Breast J. 2009;15:500–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pachman DR, Barton DL, Swetz KM, Loprinzi CL. Troublesome symptoms in cancer survivors: fatigue, insomnia, neuropathy, and pain. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3687–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999;281:537–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thomas H, Chang C, Dillon S, Hess R. Sexual activity in midlife women: importance of sex matters. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:631–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ginsberg TB, Pomerantz SC, Kramer-Feeley V. Sexuality in older adults: behaviours and preferences. Age Ageing. 2005;34:475–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members of the VICAN Group: Thomas Aparicio, Emmanuel Babin, François Beck, Daniel Benamouzig, Robert Benamouzig, MKB, Dominique Bessette, ADB, Philippe-Jean Bousquet, Marie-Claude Cabanel-Gicquel, Michèle Chantry, Claire Chauvet, Jacqueline Clavel, Sébastien Cortaredona, BC, Véronique Danguy, Sarah Dauchy, Mario Di Palma, Michel Dorval, Jean-Baptiste Herbet, Laetitia Huiart, Xavier Joutard, Marianick Lambert, Anne-Gaëlle Le Corroller-Soriano, Stéphane Legleye, JM, Jean-François Morère, Nora Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Hermann Nabi, Alain Paraponaris, PPW, Graziella Pourcel, MP, Frédérique Retornaze, DR, Benoît Riandey, Laetitia Rollin, Luis Sagaon-Teyssier, Valérie Seror, Archana Singh-Manoux, Catherine Thieblemont and Patricia Verney.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Mancini.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The VICAN study was funded by the French National Institute of Cancer (Institut National du Cancer, INCa) “Contrat de recherche et développement no 05-2011”. ABC was supported by Regional Council (conseil régional Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur, France).

Role of the funding source

Five members of the VICAN group (Dominique Bessette, Philippe-Jean Bousquet, Claire Chauvet, Jean-Baptiste Herbet, and Hermann Nabi) are/were employed by INCa and were involved in the study design and global analysis and interpretation of VICAN data. Otherwise, the funding sources had no involvement in the study design, or in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 33 kb)

ESM 2

(DOC 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Charif, A., Bouhnik, AD., Courbière, B. et al. Sexual health problems in French cancer survivors 2 years after diagnosis—the national VICAN survey. J Cancer Surviv 10, 600–609 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0506-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0506-3

Keywords

Navigation