Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 457–466 | Cite as

The salience of cancer and the “survivor” identity for people who have completed acute cancer treatment: a qualitative study

  • Katherine Clegg SmithEmail author
  • Ann C. Klassen
  • Kisha I. Coa
  • Susan M. Hannum
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Globally, there are nearly 33 million persons who have survived 5 or more years after a diagnosis of cancer [1]. We explore the salience of cancer in such people’s self-concept as an important element for creating patient-centered care for those living with a cancer history.

Methods

Our data are responses to a free-listing exercise and subsequent qualitative interviews with 53 individuals aged between 45 and 74 who were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or breast or prostate cancer at least 3 years prior and had completed acute treatment. Participants lived in the Baltimore-Washington region of the USA.

Results

Cancer was not necessarily salient to participants’ current self-concept, and espousal of a “survivor” identity is complex. We construct a typology of seven contrasting meanings of “survivor” based upon participants’ narratives (factual, beaten, functional, temporary, adversity, passage of time, and lucky or blessed) and present interviewees’ rationales as to why they did or did not adopt a survivorship identity.

Conclusions

We examine the complexity of “survivorship” as an identity and people’s affiliation with it, as well as how this relates to other salient and fluid elements of people’s sense of self within a life course perspective.

Implications for cancer survivors

Understanding how cancer factors into people’s self-concept throughout the life course is important for designing effective, patient-centered programs that acknowledge diverse experiences and expectations and possible changes with the passage of time.

Keywords

Cancer Survivorship Identity Qualitative methods Phenomenology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all of the members of the “Eating For Life” research team for their assistance in the conceptualization and implementation of this research. We are grateful to all of our research participants for the time and insights that made this analysis possible. This research is funded by National Cancer Institute-National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Grant #1R21CA152789 (Smith). Dr. Kisha I. Coa was supported during her doctoral training by the National Institutes of Health, National Research Service Award T32 CA009314. Dr. Susan M. Hannum was supported during her postdoctoral training by the National Institutes of Health, National Research Service Award T32 CA009314.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Supplementary material

11764_2015_489_MOESM1_ESM.doc (38 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 37 kb)
11764_2015_489_MOESM2_ESM.doc (36 kb)
ESM 2 (DOC 35 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control (2015) Global cancer statistics. In: International Cancer Control. 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/international/statistics.htm. Retrieved March 3, 2015.
  2. 2.
    Phillips JM, Cohen MZ, Moses G. Breast cancer screening and African American women: fear, fatalism, and silence. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:561–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke JN, Everest MM. Cancer in the mass print media: fear, uncertainty and the medical model. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2591–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miles A, Voorwinden S, Chapman S, Wardle J. Psychologic predictors of cancer information avoidance among older adults: the role of cancer fear and fatalism. Cancer Epidem Biomar. 2008;17:1872–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muzzin LJ, Anderson NJ, Figueredo AT, Gudelis SO. The experience of cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1201–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Else-Quest NM, LoConte NK, Schiller JH, Shibley HJ. Perceived stigma, self-blame, and adjustment among lung, breast and prostate cancer patients. Psychol Health. 2009;24(8):949–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellizzi K, Blank T. Cancer-related identity and positive affect in survivors of prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:44–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zebrack B. Cancer survivor identity and quality of life. Cancer Pract. 2000;8:238–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park CL, Zlateva I, Blank TO. Self-Identity after cancer: “survivor”, “victim”, “patient”, and “person with cancer”. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(Suppl2):S430–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deimling GT, Bowman KF, Wagner LJ. Cancer survivorship and identity among long-term survivors. Cancer Invest. 2007;25:758–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullan F. Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(40):270–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaiser K. The meaning of the survivor identity for women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:79–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chambers SK, Baade P, Meng X, Youl P, Aitken J, Dunn J. Survivor identity after colorectal cancer: antecedents, prevalence and outcomes. Psychooncology. 2011;21:962–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan NF, Harrison S, Rose PW, Ward A, Evans J. Interpretation and acceptance of the term ‘cancer survivor’: a United Kingdom-based qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2012;21:177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelly KM, Shah N, Shedlosky-Shoemaker R, Porter K, Agnese D. Living post treatment: definitions of those with history and no history of cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5:158–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jagielski CH, Hawley ST, Corbin K, Weiss MC, Griggs JJ. Phoenix rising: who considers herself a “survivor” after a diagnosis of breast cancer? J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6:541–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris BA, Lepor SJ, Wilson B, Lieberman MA, Dunn J, Chambers SK. Adopting a survivor identity after cancer in a peer support context. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8:427–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bell K, Ristovski-Slijepcevic S. Cancer survivorship: why labels matter. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:409–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Clegg Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ann C. Klassen
    • 2
  • Kisha I. Coa
    • 1
  • Susan M. Hannum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health, Behavior and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community Health and PreventionDrexel University School of Public HealthPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations