Skip to main content

Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment

Journal of Cancer Survivorship volume 7, pages 211–218 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Previous research has identified gaps in cancer survivors’ knowledge of their diagnosis and treatment. This study assessed the effect of treatment summaries on survivors’ accuracy in reporting details of diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

Written surveys were completed by 203 breast cancer survivors and 141 colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed between 1999 and 2008 at a cancer center in the Minneapolis, MN, area (78 % response rate). All completed the survey before and again 17 months after receiving a treatment summary, which was sent to them upon request. Accuracy of response at each assessment was compared to cancer registry and medical records.

Results

Both breast and colorectal cancer survivors showed significant improvement in accuracy on stage of disease, and breast cancer survivors showed significant improvement in accuracy on morphology, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, receipt of hormone therapy, and receipt of doxorubicin after receiving the treatment summary. Breast cancer survivors and older individuals were more likely than colorectal cancer survivors or younger individuals to indicate that they used the treatment summary in completing the second survey. Even for items on which accuracy improved significantly, however, patient knowledge remained incomplete.

Conclusions

The provision of treatment summaries can improve cancer survivors’ knowledge of details about their diagnosis and treatment.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Treatment summaries can meet the specific goal of increasing patient knowledge. Their effectiveness might be greater if presented during a dedicated survivorship health care appointment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. President’s Cancer Panel, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute: Living beyond cancer: finding a new balance. http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/annualReports/pcp03-04rpt/Survivorship.pdf (2004). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  2. Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: The National Academies; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Society of Clinical Oncology: Chemotherapy treatment plan and summary. http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Practice+%26+Guidelines/Quality+Care/Quality+Measurement+%26+Improvement/Chemotherapy+Treatment+Plan+and+Summary (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  4. American Cancer Society: Survivorship care plans. http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/SurvivorshipDuringandAfterTreatment/SurvivorshipCarePlans/index (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  5. LIVESTRONG: Develop my LIVESTRONG Care Plan. http://www.livestrongcareplan.org/ (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  6. Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring patient-centered care. http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/cocprogramstandards2012.pdf (2012). Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  7. Hahn EE, Ganz PA. Survivorship programs and care plans in practice: variations on a theme. J Oncol Practice. 2011;7(2):70–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5117–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kantsiper M, McDonald EL, Geller G, Schockney L, Snyder C, Wolff AC. Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:459–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burg MA, Lopez EDS, Dailey A, Keller ME, Prendergast B. The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24 Suppl 2:467–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller R. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(3):479–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baravelli C, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Schofield P, Lotfi-Jam K, Rogers M, Milne D, Aranda S, King D, Shaw B, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivors and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(2):99–108.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson EK, Sugden EM, Rose PW. Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):159–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shalom MM, Hahn EE, Casillas J, Ganz PA. Do survivorship care plans make a difference? A primary care provider perspective. J Oncol Practice. 2011;7(5):314–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, Joy AA, Provencher L, Rayson D, Rheaume DE, Porter GA, Paszat LF, Pritchard KI, Robidoux A, Smith S, Sussman J, Dent S, Sisler J, Wiernikowski J, Levine MN. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4755–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Palmer SC. Survivorship care plans: an argument for evidence over common sense. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1392–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jefford M, Schofield P, Emery J. Improving survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1391–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith TJ, Snyder C. Is it time for (Survivorship Care) Plan B? J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4740–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA, Syrjala KL, McCabe MS, Baker KS, Miller K, Casillas J, Rosenstein DL, Campbell M, Palmer SC. Survivorship care planning after the Institute of Medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(4):358–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Ouhoummane N, Robert J. Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:364–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips KA, Milne RL, Buys S, Friedlander ML, Ward JH, McCredie MRE, Giles GG, Hopper JL. Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based breast cancer family registry. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4679–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, West MM, Aft R. Self-report by elderly breast cancer patients was an acceptable alternative to surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) abstract data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1316–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yen TWF, Sparapani RA, Guo C, Neuner JM, Laud PW, Nattinger AB. Elderly breast cancer survivors accurately self-report key treatment information. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;59(2):410–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Y, Diamant AL, Thind A, Maly RC. Validity of self-reports of breast cancer treatment in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119(3):745–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clegg LX, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Hankey BF, Hoffman RM, Stanford JL, Hamilton AS. Comparison of self-reported initial treatment with medical records: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. Amer J Epidemiol. 2001;154(6):582–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nissen MJ, Tsai ML, Blaes AH, Swenson KK. Breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(1):20–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mertens WC, Loke C, Katz D, Barham R, Makari-Judson G. Recalling breast cancer presentation and therapy: associations between patient inaccuracy and demographic characteristics. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29 Suppl Abstr 9067. Presented at the Annual ASCO meeting, Chicago, IL. June 2011.

  28. Friedman WF. Memory for the time of past events. Psych Bulletin. 1993;113:44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Services Res. 2004;39:1005–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, Kwan L, Laouri M, Ganz PA. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:835–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cress RD, Zaslavsky AM, West DW, Wolf RE, Felter MC, Ayanian JZ. Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries. Med Care. 2003;41:1006–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by Park Nicollet Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Oncology Research Department, Park Nicollet Institute, 3931 Louisiana Avenue, FRCC, 1st floor, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, 55426, MN, USA

    Mary Jo Nissen, Michaela L. Tsai & Karen K. Swenson

  2. Division of Hematology/Oncology/Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Anne H. Blaes

  3. Methodist Hospital Cancer Registry, Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Susan Koering

Authors
  1. Mary Jo Nissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michaela L. Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne H. Blaes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karen K. Swenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Susan Koering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Jo Nissen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nissen, M.J., Tsai, M.L., Blaes, A.H. et al. Effectiveness of treatment summaries in increasing breast and colorectal cancer survivors’ knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment. J Cancer Surviv 7, 211–218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0261-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0261-7

Keywords

  • Treatment summaries
  • Health knowledge
  • Patient education
  • Survivorship
  • Breast neoplasms
  • Colorectal neoplasms