Skip to main content

Social welfare and legal constraints associated with work among breast and prostate cancer survivors: experiences from Ireland

Journal of Cancer Survivorship volume 5, pages 382–394 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Around 40% of cancer survivors are of working age. We investigated employment outcomes among survivors in Ireland where sick leave and sick pay are at the employers’ discretion and the law affords no protection against dismissal following extended absence.

Methods

A questionnaire was mailed to 1,373 survivors, identified from the National Cancer Registry, 6–24 months post-diagnosis. The analysis included breast and prostate cancer respondents who were working at diagnosis. Factors associated with work continuation post-diagnosis and work resumption after cancer-related absence were identified using logistic regression.

Results

The response rate was 54%. Three hundred forty-six respondents were working at diagnosis (breast cancer = 246; prostate cancer = 100). Sixty-two (18%) continued working post-diagnosis. Factors significantly associated with work continuation were: self-employment, prostate cancer, lower pre-diagnosis household income, and not having surgery. Two hundred eighty-four took time off work post-diagnosis; of these, 51 (18%) had left the workforce, 187 (66%) had resumed working, and 46 (16%) planned to resume working. Factors significantly associated with work resumption were: tertiary education, not having chemotherapy, receiving sick pay, and not having a medical card (which provides free access to public health services). Among those who resumed working, the median absence was 30.1 weeks (inter-quartile range = 12.9–51.6). The length of absence varied significantly by socio-demographic, financial, medical, and job- and social welfare-related factors. Median working hours pre- and post-diagnosis differed significantly (pre-diagnosis = 38/week; post-diagnosis = 30/week; p<0.001).

Conclusions

The high level of workforce departure and associations between self-employment, sick pay and medical cards, and employment outcomes suggest that social welfare and legal provisions are important determinants of the survivors’ workforce participation.

Implications for survivors

In formulating strategies to optimise survivors’ employment outcomes, it is important that policy- and decision-makers are aware of the influence of social welfare and legal provisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Maddams J, Brewster D, Gavin A, Steward J, Elliott J, Utley M, et al. Cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom: estimates for 2008. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gondos A, Bray F, Hakulinen T, Brenner H, EUNICE Survival Working Group Collaborators. Trends in cancer survival in 11 European populations from 1990 to 2009: a model-based analysis. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:564–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chirikos TN, Russell-Jacobs A, Cantor AB. Indirect economic effects of long-term breast cancer survival. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy F, Haslam C, Munir F, Pryce J. Returning to work following cancer: a qualitative exploratory study into the experience of returning to work following cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2007;16:17–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharp L, Timmons A. The financial impact of a cancer diagnosis. Cork/Dublin: National Cancer Registry/Irish Cancer Society; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Max W, Rice DP, Sung HY, Michel M, Breuer W, Zhang X. The economic burden of prostate cancer, California, 1998. Cancer. 2002;94:2906–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Oliva J, Lobo F, Lopez-Bastida J, Zozaya N, Romay R. Indirect costs of cervical and breast cancers in Spain. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6:309–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tinghög G, Carlsson P, Synnerstad I, Rosdahl I. Societal cost of skin cancer in Sweden in 2005. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schag CA, Ganz PA, Wing DS, Sim MS, Lee JJ. Quality of life in adult survivors of lung, colon and prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:127–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrell BR, Grant MM, Funk B, Otis-Green S, Garcia N. Quality of life in breast cancer survivors as identified by focus groups. Psycho-oncol. 1997;6:13–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peteet JR. Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000;22:200–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taskila T, Lindbohm ML, Martikainen R, Lehto US, Hakanen J, Hietanen P. Cancer survivors' received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14:427–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amir Z, Neary D, Luker K. Cancer survivors’ views of work 3 years post diagnosis: a UK perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12:190–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Boer AG, Taskila T, Ojajarvi A, van Dijk FJ, Verbeek JH. Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA. 2009;301:753–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehnert A. Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;77:109–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHAM. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-oncol. 2002;11:124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taskila T, Lindbohm ML. Factors affecting cancer survivors' employment and work ability. Acta Oncol. 2007;46:446–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffman B. Cancer survivors at work: a generation of progress. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z, Schenk M. Employment and cancer: findings from a longitudinal study of breast and prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Investig. 2007;25:47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Health Service Executive. Annual Report and Financial Statements, 2007. Kildare: HSE. Available from: http://www.lenus.ie/hse/handle/10147/65199.

  22. World Health Organization Europe. Highlights on health in Ireland 2004. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blazeby J, Sprangers M, Cull A, Groenvold M, Bottomley A. EORTC Quality of Life Group Guidelines for Developing Questionnaire Modules. 3rd ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Central Statistics Office ILO participation and unemployment rates by Sex, Region, Quarter and Statistic. Available from: http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=QNCQ4&ti=ILO+participation+and+unemployment+rates+by+Sex,+Region,+Quarter+and+Statistic&path=../Database/Eirestat/Quarterly%20National%20Household%20Survey/&lang=1.

  26. Amir Z, Moran T, Walsh L, Iddenden R. Luker K Return to paid work after cancer: a British experience. J Cancer Surviv. 2007;1:129–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Central Statistics Office Quarterly National Household Survey. Work organisation and working time. Quarter 2 2004. Dublin/Cork: Central Statistics Office; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Drolet M, Maunsell E, Mondor M, Brisson C, Brisson J, Masse B, et al. Work absence after breast cancer diagnosis: a population-based study. CMAJ. 2005;173:765–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z, Bednarek H, Schenk M. Employment outcomes of men treated for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:958–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Bednarek HL, Schenk M. Short-term effects of breast cancer on labor market attachment: results from a longitudinal study. J Health Econ. 2005;24:137–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Donnelly D, Comber H, Gavin A. Cancer in Ireland 1994–2004: a summary report. Belfast/Cork: Northern Ireland Cancer Registry/National Cancer Registry; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Central Statistics Office. Quarterly National Household Survey. Quarter 3 2010. Dublin/Cork: Central Statistics Office; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bouknight RR, Bradley CJ, Luo Z. Luo Z Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:345–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yarker J, Munir F, Bains M, Kalawsky K, Haslam C. The role of communication and support in return to work following cancer-related absence. Psycho-oncology. 2010;19:1078–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C. Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fodor É, Rédai D. Differences between men and women in work quality. D7.2—August 2008. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht/Central European University; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nachreiner NM, Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Baker BA, Alexander BH, Gerberich SG. Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN J. 2007;55:290–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Morden P, Ostiguy L (2005) Gender differences in the centrality of work, leisure, family and community and models predicting life satisfaction. Paper presented at the Eleventh Canadian Congress on Leisure Research, Nanaimo, British Columbia. Available from: http://lin.ca/Uploads/cclr11/CCLR11-100.pdf.

  39. McGinnity F, Crowley N, Russell H (2008) Study highlights significant gender inequalities in domestic sphere. The Economic and Social Research Institute. Available from: http://www.esri.ie.

  40. Central Statistics Office Tables 1,2 and 3: Average Earnings and Hours Worked by Sex, Broad Industrial Sector, Year and Statistic. Cork: Central Statistics Office. Available from: http://www.cso.ie/px/pxeirestat/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=QIJA1&ti=Tables+1,2+and+3:+Average+Earnings+and+Hours+Worked+by+Sex,+Broad+Industrial+Sector,+Year+and+Statistic&path=../Database/Eirestat/Earnings%20Employment%20and%20Productivity%20in%20Industry/&lang=1.

  41. Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M. Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and prostate cancer patients in the months following diagnosis. Psycho-oncol. 2006;15:739–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Central Statistics Office Table 7. Persons, males and females aged 15 years and over in the labour force, classified by intermediate occupational group and highest level of education completed, 2006. Cork: Central Statistics Office. Available from: http://census.cso.ie/Census/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=75582.

  43. Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:82–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohm M. Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:914–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Short PF, Vasey JJ, BeLue R. Work disability associated with cancer survivorship and other chronic conditions. Psycho-oncol. 2008;17:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Central Statistics Office. Survey on income and living conditions (SILC) in Ireland, 2007. Dublin/Cork: Central Statistics Office; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brisson J, Brisson C, Mâsse B, Deschênes L. Work situation after breast cancer: results from a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1813–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. National Cancer Registry Cancer in Ireland. 1994 to 1998: incidence, mortality, treatment and survival. Cork: National Cancer Registry; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC, Bruns GL, Stoler MR, Nassif T, et al. Work in cancer survivors:a model for research and practice. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4:415–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The fieldwork was funded by the Irish Cancer Society and the analysis and write-up was supported by the Health Research Board. We thank the study participants. We are grateful to the members of the project Steering Committee (Harry Comber, Noeleen Donnelly, Joan Kelly, John McCormack, Niamh Ni Chonghaile, Eileen O’Donnell, and Olwyn Ryan) for their input, and to Claire O’Callaghan for administrative and clerical support.

Disclosure of interests

The authors have no relevant interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Cancer Registry Ireland, Building 6800, Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Cork, Ireland

    Linda Sharp & Aileen Timmons

Authors
  1. Linda Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aileen Timmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Sharp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharp, L., Timmons, A. Social welfare and legal constraints associated with work among breast and prostate cancer survivors: experiences from Ireland. J Cancer Surviv 5, 382–394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0183-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0183-9

Keywords

  • Survivor
  • Breast cancer
  • Prostate cancer
  • Employment
  • Work
  • Self-employed