Adult cancer survivorship care: experiences from the LIVESTRONG centers of excellence network

  • Marci K. Campbell
  • Irene Tessaro
  • Mindy Gellin
  • Carmina G. Valle
  • Shannon Golden
  • Leanne Kaye
  • Patricia A. Ganz
  • Mary S. McCabe
  • Linda A. Jacobs
  • Karen Syrjala
  • Barbara Anderson
  • Alison F. Jones
  • Kenneth Miller
Article

Abstract

Background

The objectives of this study were to characterize survivorship models of care across eight LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence (COE) Network sites and to identify barriers and facilitators influencing survivorship care.

Methods

Using the framework of the Chronic Care Model (CCM), quantitative and qualitative methods of inquiry were conducted with the COEs. Methods included document reviews, key informant telephone interviews with 39 participants, online Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) surveys with 40 participants, and three site visits.

Results

Several overarching themes emerged in qualitative interviews and were substantiated by quantitative methods. Health system factors supporting survivorship care include organization and leadership commitment and program champions at various levels of the health care team. System barriers include reimbursement issues, lack of space, and the need for leadership commitment to support changes in clinical practices as well as having program “champions” among clinical staff. Multiple models of care include separate survivorship clinics and integrated models as well as consultative models. COEs’ scores on the ACIC survey showed overall “reasonable support” for survivorship care; however, the clinical information system domain was least developed. Although the ACIC findings indicated “reasonable support” for self-management, the qualitative analysis revealed that self-management support was largely limited to health promotion provided in clinic-based education and counseling sessions, with few COEs providing patients with self-management tools and interventions.

Conclusions

The CCM framework captured experiences and challenges of these COEs and provided insight into the current state of survivorship care in the context of National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Findings showed that cancer patients and providers could benefit from clinical information systems that would better identify candidates for survivorship care and provide timely information. In addition, a crucial area for development is self-management support outside of clinical care.

Implications for cancer survivors

Cancer survivors may benefit from learning about the experience and challenges faced by the eight LIVESTRONG Centers of Excellence in developing programs and models for cancer survivorship care, and these findings may inform patient and caregiver efforts to seek, evaluate, and advocate for quality survivorship programs designed to meet their needs.

Keywords

Cancer Cancer survivorship Chronic care model Health care 

References

  1. 1.
    Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2006. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2009; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/.
  2. 2.
    Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5117–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shulman LN, Jacobs LA, Greenfield S, Jones B, McCabe MS, Syrjala K, et al. Cancer care and cancer survivorship care in the United States: will we be able to care for these patients in the future? J Oncol Pract. 2009;5:119–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shapiro CL, McCabe MS, Syrjala KL, Friedman D, Jacobs LA, Ganz PA, et al. The LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence Network. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3:4–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20:64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Vonkorff M. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manage Care Q. 1996;4:12–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009;28:75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feuerstein M, Ganz PA. Quality health care for cancer survivors. In: Feuerstein M, Ganz P, editors. Health care for cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The MacColl Institute. Improving chronic illness care. Seattle: The MacColl Institute; 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearson ML, Wu S, Schaefer J, Bonomi AE, Shortell SM, Mendel PJ, et al. Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:978–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness; the Chronic Care Model, part 2. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:1909–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Toolkit for implementing the Chronic Care Model in an academic environment. Rockville: AHRQ Publication No. 08-MP085, 2008. http://www.ahrq.gov/populations/chroniccaremodel/. Accessed 2010.
  14. 14.
    Roberts M. Cancer deaths across Europe tipped to fall in 2011. BBC news, February 8, 2011, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12394329.
  15. 15.
    McCabe MS, Jacobs L. Survivorship care: models and programs. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2008;24:202–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, et al. Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2094–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sewell N. Continuous quality improvement in acute health care: creating a holistic and integrated approach. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1997;10:20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:791–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang MC, Hyun JK, Harrison M, Shortell SM, Fraser I. Redesigning health systems for quality: lessons from emerging practices. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:599–611.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sperl-Hillen JM, Solberg LI, Hroscikoski MC, Crain AL, Engebretson KI, O'Connor PJ. Do all components of the chronic care model contribute equally to quality improvement? Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2004;30:303–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marci K. Campbell
    • 1
    • 2
  • Irene Tessaro
    • 2
  • Mindy Gellin
    • 2
  • Carmina G. Valle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shannon Golden
    • 3
  • Leanne Kaye
    • 1
  • Patricia A. Ganz
    • 4
  • Mary S. McCabe
    • 5
  • Linda A. Jacobs
    • 6
  • Karen Syrjala
    • 7
  • Barbara Anderson
    • 8
  • Alison F. Jones
    • 9
  • Kenneth Miller
    • 10
  1. 1.Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health and School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Goldsmith Research GroupWinston-SalemUSA
  4. 4.Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNew York CityUSA
  6. 6.Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  7. 7.Biobehavioral Sciences DepartmentFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUSA
  8. 8.Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusUSA
  9. 9.University of Colorado Cancer CenterAuroraUSA
  10. 10.Dana Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations