Skip to main content
Log in

Structuring survivorship care: discipline-specific clinician perspectives

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Several models for survivorship care are prominent within the cancer literature; however, there is little empirical research that examines what oncology clinicians perceive to be the best approach to caring for cancer survivors, what services survivorship programs should include, and how prepared they feel to care for cancer survivors.

Methods

An IRB approved web-based survey of all clinical staff was conducted at a NCI designated comprehensive cancer center with a 49.8% response rate (N = 377). Data were summarized using frequencies and relative frequencies, and pairwise tests of statistical significance were utilized to evaluate differences between clinician type groups.

Results

Overall, the largest proportion of respondents preferred a disease-specific survivorship model (37.6%). This preference was specifically observed in oncology physicians and nurses. When asked where specific survivorship services should be provided, respondents indicated a preference for services directly related to survivors’ medical treatment (i.e. information about late effects) to be delivered in a disease-specific survivorship clinic, and ancillary services (i.e. nutrition and fertility counseling) to be housed in a centralized comprehensive survivorship clinic. Physicians felt that they have significantly more information, training, and resources to care for cancer survivors than did oncology nurses.

Discussion/conclusion

These results indicate that oncology clinicians prefer a combination of survivorship care delivery models where continuing medical needs are met in disease-specific clinics, and comprehensive wellness services are offered in a centralized comprehensive survivorship clinic. Results also suggest that planning for survivorship initiatives should include additional resources, education, and training for clinical staff.

Implications for cancer survivors

These findings underscore the need for a universally accepted definition of cancer survivorship, and support a model for delivering care to cancer survivors that is a blend of the disease-specific and comprehensive survivorship programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowland JH, Hewitt M, Ganz PA. Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in delivering quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5101–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Earle CC. Failing to plan is planning to fail: improving the quality of care with survivorship care plans. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5112–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cancer Facts & Figures, Vol 2009. Atlanta, American Cancer Society Inc, 2009

  5. National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Available at www.canceradvocacy.org. Accessed on April 16, 2010

  6. Institute of Medicine, Available at www.iom.edu. Accessed on April 28, 2010

  7. National Cancer Institute, Available at www.cancer.gov. Accessed on April 1, 2010.

  8. Hewwitt M, Ganz PA. Implementing cancer survivorship care planning. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ogle KS, Swanson GM, Woods N, et al. Cancer and comorbidity. Cancer. 2000;88:653–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hudson SV, Chubak J, Coups EJ, et al. Identifying key questions to advance research and practice in cancer survivorship follow-up care: a report from the ASPO survivorship interest group. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2009;18:2152–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, et al. Primary care physicians' views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Papagrigoriadis S, Koreli A. The needs of general practitioners in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2001;27:541–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, et al. Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Family Medicine. 2007;39:477–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bober SL, Recklitis CJ, Campbell EG, et al. Caring for cancer survivors. Cancer. 2009;115:4409–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grunfeld E. Primary care physicians and oncologists are players on the same team. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2246–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, et al. Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Earle CC. Associations among cancer survivorship discussions, patient and physician expectations, and receipt of follow-up care. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2577–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Irwin M, Klemp JR, Glennon C, Frazier LM. Oncology nurses' perspectives on the state of cancer survivorship care: current practice and barriers to implementation. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2011;38:E11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Donald L. Trump, Susan Black, Christina Dibble, Deborah Erwin, Rosa Scrivani, and Darryl Somayaji for their helpful input and assistance with this project.

Grant Support

The National Institute of Health grant number R25CA114101 supported this research.

Financial Disclosures

The authors have no financial disclosures to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Gage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gage, E.A., Pailler, M., Zevon, M.A. et al. Structuring survivorship care: discipline-specific clinician perspectives. J Cancer Surviv 5, 217–225 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0174-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0174-x

Keywords

Navigation