Abstract
Introduction
Due to early detection and treatment, survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis has been steadily increasing. A CRC diagnosis could be considered a “teachable moment,” a time when interventionists might successfully promote dietary changes. CRC interventions with tailored print communication (TPC) and telephone motivational interviewing (TMI) have been shown to be effective in promoting fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) among CRC survivors. However, little is known about how these interventions work to exert their effect. This study investigated whether information processes mediate the relationship between a CRC intervention and FVC among CRC survivors.
Methods
This research used data from NC STRIDES, a study that tested the efficacy of two CRC intervention strategies to promote FVC among CRC survivors. Participants were randomized to control, TPC, TMI, or combined (TPC+TMI). Structural equation models were constructed to analyze data from 266 CRC survivors using two different measures of FVC, a 35-item and a 2-item measure.
Results
Two information processes, relevance of communication and trust in the communication, mediated the effect of TPC+TMI on FVC for both 35-item and 2-item measures. TPC+TMI was significantly associated with relevance of communication, and perceiving greater relevance was significantly related to trust in the communication. Trust was significantly related to FVC.
Discussion
Information processes, including relevance and trust in the communication, serve as mediators of the relationship between the CRC intervention and FVC.
Implications for cancer survivors
Future intervention research should investigate ways to enhance relevance of communication and trust in interventions with CRC survivors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Cancer Society (ACS) (2008) Cancer facts and figures. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/2008CAFFfinalsecured.pdf.
Gritz ER, Fingeret MC, Vidrine DJ, Lazev AB, Mehta NV, Reece GP. Successes and failures of the teachable moment. Cancer. 2005;106:17–27.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Peterson B, McBride C, Lipkus I, Clipp E. Current health behaviors and readiness to pursue life-style changes among men and women diagnosed with early stage prostate and breast carcinomas. Cancer. 2000;88:674–84.
McBride CM, Clipp E, Peterson BL, Lipkus IM, Demark-Wahnefried W. Psychological impact of diagnosis and risk reduction among cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2000;9:418–27.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Clipp EC, Lipkus IM, Lobach D, Snyder DC, Sloane R, et al. Main outcomes of the FRESH START trial: a sequentially tailored, diet, exercise mailed print intervention among breast and prostate cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2709–18.
Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA, Nixon DW, Shapiro A, Hoy MK, et al. Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the women’s intervention nutrition study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1767–76.
Meyerhardt J, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Hu FB, Mayer RJ, et al. Association of dietary patterns with cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. JAMA. 2007;298:754–64.
Pierce JP, Newman VA, Flatt SW, Faerber S, Rock CL, Natarajan L, et al. Telephone counseling intervention increases intakes of micronutrient-and phytochemical-rich vegetables, fruit and fiber in breast cancer survivors. J Nutr. 2004;134:452–8.
Kreuter M, Skinner CS, Steger-May K, Holt CL, Bucholtz DC, Clark EM, et al. Responses to behaviorally vs culturally tailored cancer communication among African American women. Am J Health Behav. 2004;28:195–207.
Petty RE, Priester J, Wegener DT. Cognitive processes in persuasion. In: Wyer T, Srull T, editors. The handbook of social cognition. New Jersey: Erlbaum; 1994. p. 63–149.
Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and untailored weight loss materials. Health Psychol. 1999;8:487–94.
Bull FC, Holt CL, Kreuter MW, Clark EM, Scharff D. Understanding the effects of print health education materials: which features lead to which outcomes. J Health Commun. 2001;6:265–79.
Ko LK, Campbell MK, Lewis MA, Earp J, DeVellis B. Information processes mediate the effect of a health communication intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption. J Health Commun. In Press.
McGuire WJ. Attitudes and attitude change. In: Gardner L, Elliot A, editors. The handbook of social psychology. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1985. p. 233–346.
McGuire WJ. Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In: Rice R, Atkin C, editors. Public communication campaigns. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989. p. 43–65.
Petty RT, Cacioppo JT, Strathman AJ, Priester JR. To think or not to think. Exploring two routes to persuasion. In: Shavitt S, Brock TC, editors. Persuasion: psychological insights and perspectives. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1994. p. 113–47.
Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:454–66.
Campbell M, Quintiliani L. Tailored interventions in public health. Am Behav Sci. 2006;49:1–19.
Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL, Menon U, McCance K, Parsons SK, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:342–50.
Deardiarian AK. Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients. Nurs Res. 1986;35:276–81.
Simon AE, Thompson MR, Flashman K, Wardle J. Disease stage and psychosocial outcomes in colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:19–25. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01501.x.
Stark DP, House A. Anxiety in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:1261–7.
Bottomley A. Depression in cancer patients: a literature review. Eur J Cancer Care. 1998;7:181–91.
Rimer BK, Glassman B. Is there a use for tailored print communications for cancer risk communication? J Natl Canc Inst Monogr. 1999;25:140–8.
Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, Curry S, Prochaska JO. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:290–8.
Satia J, Campbell M, Galanko J, James A, Carr C, Sandler R. Longitudinal changes and lifestyle behaviors and health status in colon cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1022–31.
James AS, Campbell MK, DeVellis B, Reedy J, Carr C, Sandler RS. Health behavior correlates among colon cancer survivors: NC STRIDES baseline results. Am J Health Behav. 2006;30:720–30.
Campbell MK, Carr C, DeVellis B, Biddle A, Amamoo A, Walsh J, et al. A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control. Ann Behav Med. 2009;38:71–85.
Resnicow K, Wallace D, Jackson A, Digirolamo A, Odom E, Wang T, et al. Dietary change through African American churches: baseline results and program description of the eat for life trial. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15:156–63.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.
MacKinnon DP, Dwyer JH. Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review. 1993;17:144–58.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
Bollen K. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1989.
Beckjord EB, Arora NK, McLaughlin W, Oakley-Girvan I, Hamilton AS, Hesse BW. Health-related information needs in a large and diverse sample of adult cancer survivors: implications for cancer care. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2:179–89. doi:10.1007/s11764-008-0055-0.
Becker LB, Doolittle JC. How repetition affects evaluations of and information seeking about candidates. Journalism Q. 1975;52:611–7.
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37:97–109.
Grass RC, Wallace HW. Satiation effects of TV commercials. J Advertising Res. 1969;9:3–9.
Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Meth. 2002;7:422–45.
Acknowledgments
The NC STRIDES study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (RO1-CA81914). This project was supported in part by the UNC Lineberger Cancer Control Education Program (R25 CA057726), Lawrence G. Branch doctoral student research award from the American Public Health Association, and the Vivian Drenckhan Graduate Student Scholarship from the Society for Public Health Education. The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Joan F. Walsh and Ms. Carol Carr for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ko, L.K., Campbell, M.K., Lewis, M.A. et al. Mediators of fruit and vegetable consumption among colorectal cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 4, 149–158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0116-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-010-0116-z