Skip to main content

Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer

Journal of Cancer Survivorship volume 4, pages 74–85 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

The present study evaluated intimacy as a mechanism for the effects of relationship-enhancing (self-disclosure, mutual constructive communication) and relationship-compromising communication (holding back, mutual avoidance, and demand-withdraw communication) on couples’ psychological distress.

Methods

Seventy-five men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in the past year and their partners completed surveys about communication, intimacy, and distress.

Results

Multi-level models with the couple as unit of analyses indicated that the association between mutual constructive communication, mutual avoidance, and patient demand-partner withdraw and distress could be accounted for by their influence on relationship intimacy. Intimacy did not mediate associations between self-disclosure, holding back, and partner demand-patient withdraw communication and distress.

Discussion/conclusions

These findings indicate that the way in which couples talk about cancer-related concerns as well as the degree to which one or both partners avoid talking about cancer-related concerns can either facilitate or reduce relationship intimacy, and that it is largely by this mechanism that these three communication strategies impact psychological distress.

Implications for cancer survivors

Relationship intimacy and how patients and partners communicate to achieve this intimacy is important for the psychological adjustment of early stage prostate cancer survivors and their partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

FIGURE 1

References

  1. Balderson N, Towell T. The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer who are seeking support. Br J Health Psychol. 2003;8:125–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisson JI, Chubb HL, Bennett S. The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancer. BJU International. 2002;90:56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cliff A, Macdonagh R. Psychosocial morbidity in prostate cancer: ll. A comparsion of patients and partners. BJU International. 2000;86:834–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kornblith AB, Herr HW. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Cancer. 1994;73:2791–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eton DT, Lepore SJ. Prostate cancer and health-related quality of life: a review of the literature. Psycho-Oncol. 2002;11(4):307–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Couper JW, Bloch S, Love A, Duchesne G, Macvean M, Kissane DW. The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer on patients and their partners. Med J Aust. 2006;185(8):428–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Street AF, Couper JW, Love AW, Bloch S, Kissane DW, Street BC. Psychosocial adaptation in female partners of men with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2009. Jul 20.

  8. Badr H, Carmack Taylor CL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in coupels coping with prostate cancer. Psych-Oncology. 2008. [Epub ahead of print].

  9. Gray RE, Fitch M, Davis C, Phillips C. Interviews with men with prostate cancer about their self-help group experience. J Palliat Care. 1997;13(1):15–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Banthia R, Malcarne VL, Varni JW, Ko CM, Sadler GR, Greenbergs HL. The effects of dyadic strength and coping styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer. J Behav Med. 2003;26(1):31–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perez MA, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE. Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol. 2002;21:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boehmer U, Clark J. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:226–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D. Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. (J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;4(5):1394–403. Epub 2007 Jul 18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS. Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1998;17(1):89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kershaw TS, Mood DW, Newth G, Ronis DL, Sanda MG, Vaishampayan U, et al. Longitudinal analysis of a model to predict quality of life in prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36(2):117–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(S11):2541–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manne SL, Ostroff J, Rini C, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G. The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. J Fam Psychol. 2004;18:589–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Porter L, Keefe F, Hurwitz H, Faber M. Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their spouses. Psycho-Oncol. 2005;14(12):1030–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manne SL, Ostroff J, Norton T, Fox K, Goldstein L, Grana G. Cancer-related relationship communication in couples coping with early stage breast cancer. Psycho- Oncol. 2006;15(3):234–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Manne SL, Ostroff J, Winkel G, Grana G, Fox K. Partner unsupportive responses, avoidant coping, and distress among women with early stage breast cancer: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol. 2005;24(6):635–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clark J, Bokhour B, Inui T, Silliman R, Talcott J. Measuring patient' perceptions of the outcomes of treatment for early prostate cancer. Med Care. 2003;41(8):923–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lilleby W, Fossa SD, Waehre HR, Olsen DR. Long-term morbidity and quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;43(4):735–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, Brindley C, Gold G, Schnider B. Appriasal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis. 1960;11:17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):822–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH. Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the international index of erectile function. Urology. 1999;54(2):346–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, Ganz PA, Leake B, Brook RH. The UCLA prostate cancer index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. Med Care. 1998;36(7):1002–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ishihara M, Suzuki H, Akakura K, Komiya A, Imamoto T, Tobe T, et al. Baseline health-related quality of life in the management of prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2006;13(7):920–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:789–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laurenceau JP, Barrett LF, Rovine M. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. J Fam Psychol. 2005;19(2):314–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Christensen A, Sullaway M. Communication patterns questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Los Angeles: University of California; 1984.

  31. Christensen A. Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. Perspectives on Marital Interaction. 1988;30–52.

  32. Heavey CL, Layne C, Christensen A. Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(1):16–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spanier GB, Filsinger EE. The dyadic adjustment scale. Marriage and family assessment: a sourcebood for family therapy. 1st ed. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1983. p. 155–68.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schaefer MT, Olson DH. Assessing intimacy: the pair inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1981;47–60.

  35. Talmadge L, Dabbs JM. Intimacy, conversational patterns, and concomitant cognitive/emotional processes in couples. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1990;9(4):473–88.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Derogatis L. BSI 18 administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kenny D, Kashy DA, Cook D. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shrout PE, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Meth. 2002;7(4):422–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Srivastava S, McGonigal KM, Richards JM, Butler EA, Gross JJ. Optimism in close relationships: how seeing things in a positive light makes them so. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;91(1):143–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kurdek LA. The allocation of household labor by partners in gay and lesbian couples. J Fam Issues. 2007;28(1):132–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baron R, Kenny D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kenny DA, Korchmaros JD, Bolger N. Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychol Meth. 2003;8(2):115–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Manne SL, Ostroff J, Sherman M, Heyman R, Ross S, Fox K. Couples' support-related communication, psychological distress and relationship satisfaction among women with early stage breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(4):660–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Berg CA, Wiebe DJ, Butner J, Bloor L, Bradstreet C, Upchurch R, et al. Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychol Aging. 2008;23(3):505–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Manne SL, Alfieri T, Taylor K, Dougherty J. Preferences for spousal support among individuals with cancer. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29(4):722–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Finch J, Zautra A. Testing latent longitudinal models of social ties and depression among the elderly: A comparison of distribution-free and maximum likelihood estimates with nonnormal data. Psychol Aging. 1992;7(1):107–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Manne SL, Zautra AJ. Spouse criticism and support: their association with coping and psychological adjustment among women with rheumatoid arthritis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56:608–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosenthal R. Advanced social psychology. In: Tesser A, editor. Methodology. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(4):350–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007;110(12):2809–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104(12):2689–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Harden J, Northouse L, Cimprich B, Pohl JM, Liang J, Kershaw T. The influence of developmental life stage on quality of life in survivors of prostate cancer and their partners. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(2):84–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim Y, Kashy DA, Wellisch DK, Spillers RL, Kaw CK, Smith TG. Quality of life of couples dealing with cancer: dyadic and individual adjustment among breast and prostate cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(2):230–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by an Established Investigator in Cancer Prevention and Control Award to Sharon Manne by the NCI (K05 CA109008), a Cancer Prevention and Control Career Development Award by the NCI (K07 CA124668) to Hoda Badr, a Memorial Sloan Kettering Society grant to David Kissane, and by a P30 CA006927 grant to Fox Chase Cancer Center. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Drs. John Mulhall, Eric Horwitz, Richard Greenberg, David Chen, James Easton, Robert Uzzo, and Alan Pollack for allowing access to their patients for this study. Jennifer Burden, Megan Eisenberg, Kristen Sorice, and Sara Worhach collected study data. Maryann Krayger provided technical assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control, Cheltenham, PA, USA

    Sharon Manne

  2. Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Hoda Badr

  3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Talia Zaider, Christian Nelson & David Kissane

Authors
  1. Sharon Manne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hoda Badr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Talia Zaider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Kissane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Manne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manne, S., Badr, H., Zaider, T. et al. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 4, 74–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0109-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0109-y

Keywords

  • Couple communication
  • Relationship intimacy
  • Prostate cancer