Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

For many breast cancer survivors, continued surveillance will be necessary to increase the possibility of finding a new diagnosis in an early stage. One such surveillance approach, breast self-examination, has not been studied specifically in breast cancer survivors. The current study was designed to assess the practice of BSE in a sample of long-term breast cancer survivors, and to examine the personal, emotional, cognitive, and health-care provider factors that may contribute to its performance.

Methods

Three hundred forty-five breast cancer survivors (34% response rate, 345/1,001) diagnosed with in situ-stage II breast cancer between 1997–2004 at a community hospital provided answers to a mailed, self-report questionnaire.

Results

Seventy-six percent of respondents reported that they had performed a BSE in the last 30-days. Forty percent reported performing BSE once/month, 39% more than once/month, and 21% less than once/month since their diagnosis. Most of the women (90%) reported that a doctor or nurse told them to perform a BSE once/month since their diagnosis, although only 69% had actually been shown how to perform a BSE. Consistently, the perception of increased barriers to BSE performance was associated with performance of BSE less than once/month (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2, 1.6; OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.8, 0.9). In addition, depending on the model, age (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.0, 1.2), perceived effectiveness of cancer treatments (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5, 0.9), and perceived benefits of BSE (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7, 0.9) also was associated with differences in BSE performance.

Conclusion

The current study suggests that breast cancer survivors between 4 and 11 years from diagnosis practice BSE, although their perception of the barriers to conducting BSE influences the frequency of this behavior. Further examination is needed to understand why some survivors perceive greater barriers to BSE performance than others. Also needed is a prospective examination of BSE performance using behavioral measures in relation to self-report.

Implications for cancer survivors

Increased attention should be paid to this particular screening behavior performed by a majority of breast cancer survivors by both researchers and health-care providers alike. Whether survivors perform the behavior correctly and the impact it has on their emotional and cognitive well-being should be further explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures—2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emens LA, Davidson NE. The follow-up of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2003;30:338–48. doi:10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00094-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis RE, Boice JD Jr, Kleinerman RA, Flannery JT, Fraumeni JF Jr. Summary: multiple primary cancers in Connecticut, 1935–1982. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985;68:219–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McBain CA, Young EA, Swindell R, Magee B, Stewart AL. Local recurrence of breast cancer following surgery and radiotherapy: incidence and outcome. Clin Oncol (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2003;15:25–31. doi:10.1053/clon.2002.0165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fredriksson I, Liljegren G, Palm-Sjovall M, Arnesson LG, Emdin SO, Fornander T, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Br J Surg 2003;90:1093–102. doi:10.1002/bjs.4206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5091–7. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Follow-up care for breast cancer. Alexandria: ASCO; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hacksaw AK, Paul EA. Breast self-examination and death from breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003;88:1047–53. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1080–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Brogan DJ, Gammon MD, Malone KE, Swanson CA, et al. Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States). Cancer Causes & Control 2001;12:431–42. doi:10.1023/A:1011218005063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Fossati R, Confalonieri C, Liberati A. Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000;4:CD001768. (Online: Update Software).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill A, McDermott E, O’Higgins N. Hereditary breast cancer. Br J Surg 1998;8:1157.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harvey BJ, Miller AB, Baines CJ, Corey PN. Effect of breast self-examination techniques on the risk of death from breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 1997;9:1205–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holmberg L, Ekbom A, Calle E, Mokdad A, Byers T. Breast cancer mortality in relation to self-reported use of breast elf-examination. A cohort study of 450,000 women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;2:137–40. doi:10.1023/A:1005788729145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Erblich J, Bovbjerg DH, Valdimarsdottir HB. Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination. J Behav Med 2000;23:277–92. doi:10.1023/A:1005510109233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen M. First-degree relatives of breast-cancer patients: Cognitive perceptions, coping, and adherence to breast self-examination. Behav Med. (Wash, D.C.) 2002;28:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Persson K, Johansson I, Ek AC. Breast self-examination. A survey of frequency, knowledge, and attitudes. J Cancer Educ 1995;10:163–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Persson K, Svensson P-G, Ek A-C. Breast self-examination: an analysis of self-reported practice. J Adv Nurs 1997;25:886–92. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025886.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duke SS, Gordon-Sosby K, Reynolds KD, Gram IT. A study of breast cancer detection practices and beliefs in black women attending public health clinics. Health Educ Res 1994;9:331–42. doi:10.1093/her/9.3.331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray M, McMillan C. Social and behavioral predictors of women’s cancer screening practices in Northern Ireland. J Public Health Med 1993;15:147–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Douglass M, Bartolucci A, Waterbor J, Sirles A. Breast cancer early detection: differences between African American and white women’s health beliefs and detection practices. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995;5:835–7.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein SA, Lin TH, Audrain J, Stefanek M, Rimer B, Lerman C. Excessive breast self-examination among first-degree relatives of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. High-Risk Breast Cancer Consortium. Psychosomatics 1997;3:253–61.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Alagna SW, Morokoff PJ, Bevett JM, Reddy DM. Performance of breast self-examination by women at high risk for breast cancer. Women & Health 1987;2:29–46. doi:10.1300/J013v12n02_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alberg A, Helzlsouer K. Epidemiology, prevention, and early detection of breast cancer. Curr Opin Immunol 1997;5:505–11.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kash K, Holland J, Halper M, Miller D. Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:24–30. doi:10.1093/jnci/84.1.24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stefanek M, Wilcox P. First-degree relatives of breast-cancer patients: Screening practices and provision of risk information. Cancer Detec Prev 1991;15:379–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vogel V, Graves D, Vernon S, Lord J, Winn R, Peters G. Mammographic screening of women with increased risk of breast cancer. Cancer 1990;66:1613–20. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19901001)66:7<1613::AID-CNCR2820660728>3.0.CO;2-E.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 1990;3:279–90. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:657–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Jepson C, Brody D, Boyce A. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 1991;10:259–67. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.10.4.259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chalmers KI, Luker KA. Breast self-care practices in women with primary relatives with breast cancer. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:1212–20. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.12820.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brain K, Norman P, Gray J, Mansel R. Anxiety and adherence to breast self-examination in women with a family history of breast cancer. Psychosom Med 1999;61:181–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lerman C, Schwartz M. Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993;28:145–55. doi:10.1007/BF00666427.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M. Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: Perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. J Natl Cancer Inst. Monographs 1994;16:171–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brain K, Gray J, Norman P, et al. Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? J Med Genet 2000;37:191–202. doi:10.1136/jmg.37.3.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cameron LD, Leventhal H, Love RR. Trait anxiety, symptom perceptions, and illness-related responses among women with breast cancer in remission during a tamoxifen clinical trial. Health Psychol 1998;17:459–69. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.17.5.459.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Champion VL. The relationship of selected variables to breast cancer detection behaviors in women 35 and older. Oncol Nurs Forum 1991;4:733–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Friedman LC, Nelson DV, Webb JA, Hoffman LP. Dispositional optimism, self-efficacy and health beliefs as predictors of breast self-examination. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:130–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Katz RC, Meyers K, Walls J. Cancer awareness and self-examination practices in young men and women. J Behav Med 1995;18:377–84. doi:10.1007/BF01857661.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindberg NM, Wellisch D. Anxiety and compliance among women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 2001;23:298–303. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strickland CJ, Feigl P, Upchurch MS, King DK, Pierce HI, Grevstad PK, et al. Improving Breast Self-Examination Compliance: A Southwest Oncology Group Randomized Trial of Three Interventions. Prev Med 1997;26:320–32. doi:10.1006/pmed.1997.0147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Buick DL. Illness representations and breast cancer: coping with radiation and chemotherapy. Perception of health and illness 1997;5:379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rabin C, Leventhal H, Goodin S. Conceptualization of disease time-line predicts post-treatment distress in breast cancer patients. Health Psychol 2004;23:407–12. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rabin C, Pinto B, Clark M. Health beliefs and health behavior changes in cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med 2002;24:S171.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miranda CR, de Resende CN, Melo CF, Costa AL Jr, Friedman H. Depression before and after uterine cervix and breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:773–6. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01142.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hopko DR, Bell JL, Armento MEA, Robertson SMC, Hunt MK, Wolfe NJ, et al. The phenomenology and screening of clinical depression in cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 2008;26:31–51. doi:10.1300/J077v26n01_03.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;3:209–18.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sundin EC, Horowitz MJ. Impact of Event Scale: Psychometric properties. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:205–9. doi:10.1192/bjp.180.3.205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Leventhal H, Nerenz DR, Steele DJ. Illness representations and coping with health threats. In: Baum A, Taylor SE, Singer JE, editors. Handbook of Psychology and Health, Volume IV: Social Psychological Aspects of Health. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1984. p. 219–52.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD, Buick D. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002;17:1–16. doi:10.1080/08870440290001494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownslee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal E, Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman J, editors. Perceptions of Health and Illness: Current Research and Applications. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rakowski W, Dube C, Marcus B, Prochaska J, Velicer W, Abrams D. Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography. Health Psychol 1992;11:111–8. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.11.2.111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rimer BK, Trock B, Lerman C, King E, Engstrom P. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med 1991;7:69–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rimer B, Kasper-Keintz M, Kessler H, Engstrom P, Rosan J. Why women resist screening mammography: Patient-related barriers. Radiology 1989;172:243–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Newcomb PA, Olsen SJ, Roberts FD, Storer BE, Love RR. Assessing breast self-examination. Prev Med 1995;24:255–8. doi:10.1006/pmed.1995.1042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Leslie NS, Roche BG. Evaluation of a breast examination facilitation device. J Adv Nurs 1995;21:28–33. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21010028.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Egbert N, Parrott R. Self-efficacy and rural women’s performance of breast and cervical cancer detection practices. Journal of Health Communication 2001;6:219–33. doi:10.1080/108107301752384415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Michelle Rogers, Melissa Clark, and William Rakowski for their input on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Miriam Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Coro West, Suite 500, One Hoppin St., Providence, RI, 02903, USA

    Peter C. Trask

  2. Private Practice, Ontario, Canada

    Lynne Pahl

  3. Oakwood Healthcare Center, Dearborn, MI, USA

    Melinda Begeman

Authors
  1. Peter C. Trask
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynne Pahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melinda Begeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. Trask.

Additional information

Supported in part by R25T CA87972

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trask, P.C., Pahl, L. & Begeman, M. Breast self-examination in long-term breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2, 243–252 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0066-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-008-0066-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation