Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quick fix for obstacles emerging in management recruitment measure using IOT-based candidate selection

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
Service Oriented Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, decision-making tool is developed for the identification of the optimal aspirant for the recruitment procedure. It is developed using the IoT-based smart sensor architecture and Visual Studio programming language. The ideal candidates are determined by using the objective function, which is extracted from the sequence of the pairwise comparison performed using the combination of MCDM algorithms. Later, after the pairwise comparison, the process is extended to the next step, that is to allocate ranking for the best suitable candidate. This makes the tool more feasible and accurate. To identify the ranking of the finest aspirant, the combination of two MCDM technologies is used that is TOPSIS and GRA. In TOPSIS, mainly two artificial alternatives are used that is positive ideal alternative and negative ideal alternative. The Grey relational grade reduced by Grey theory (Tsai et al. in Int J 11:45–53, 2003) will be used to make an integrated and authentic evaluation system for identifying who is the best aspirant among all the candidates applied for the job of a professor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasani H, Tabatabaei SA, Amiri G (2012) Grey relational analysis to determine the optimum process parameters for open-end spinning yarns. J Eng Fiber Fabr 7:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sezer OB, Dogdu E, Ozbayoglu AM (2018) Context-aware computing, learning, and big data in internet of things: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J 5:127. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2773600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang P, Chen R, Li Y et al (2018) A localization database establishment method based on crowdsourcing inertial sensor data and quality assessment criteria. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2817599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siryani J, Tanju B, Eveleigh TJ (2017) A machine learning decision-support system improves the internet of things smart meter operations. IEEE Internet Things J 4:1056–1066. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2722358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. An J, Gui X, Wang Z (2015) A crowdsourcing assignment model based on mobile crowd sensing in the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J 2:358–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2415035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashraf QM, Habaebi MH, Islam MR (2016) TOPSIS-based service arbitration for autonomic Internet of Things. IEEE Access 4:1313–1320. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2545741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang P, Chen R, Li Y et al (2018) A localization database establishment method based on crowdsourcing inertial sensor data and quality assessment criteria. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2817599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang W, Lee K, Murray D (2017) A global generic architecture for the future Internet of Things. Serv Oriented Comput Appl 11:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-017-0213-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deepa N, Ganesan BK, Balaji Sethuramasamyraja B (2018) Predictive mathematical model for solving multi-criteria decision-making problems. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3505-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zolfani SH, Antucheviciene J (2012) Team member selecting based on AHP and TOPSIS grey. Eng Econ 23:425–434. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.23.4.2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wp F (2014) Phase targeting of terrorist attacks: simplifying complexity with AHP and TOPSIS. J Def Manag 04:1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0374.1000116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhutia PW, Phipon R (2012) Appication of ahp and topsis method for supplier selection problem. IOSR J Eng 2:2250–3021

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aly MF, El-hameed HMA (2013) Integrating AHP and genetic algorithm model. Int J Eng Trends Technol 6:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Deepa N, Ganesan K (2017) Decision-making tool for crop selection for agriculture development. Neural Comput Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3154-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liou JJH, Tzeng G-H (2012) Comments on Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol Econ Dev Econ 18:672–695. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.753489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rapti E, Karageorgos A, Houstis C, Houstis E (2017) Decentralized service discovery and selection in Internet of Things applications based on artificial potential fields. Serv Oriented Comput Appl 11:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-016-0198-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Margaris D, Vassilakis C (2017) Exploiting Internet of Things information to enhance venues recommendation accuracy. Serv Oriented Comput Appl 11:393–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-017-0216-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang T, Hung CC (2007) Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2005.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sultana MN, Habibur R, Al Mamun A (2016) Multi criteria decision making tools for supplier evaluation and selection: a review. Eur J Adv Eng Technol 3:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kundakc N (2016) Personnel selection with grey relational analysis. Manag Sci Lett 6:351–360. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.3.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nallakaruppan MK, Ilango HS (2017) Location Aware Climate Sensing and Real Time Data Analysis. World Congr Comput Commun Technol. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCCCT.2016.27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verma S (2013) Secure Track Trans 5:2560–2564

    Google Scholar 

  25. Muthukumarappan A (2017) Software Management Issues In. 8:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai C, Chang C, Chen L (2003) Applying grey relational analysis to the vendor evaluation model. Int J 11:45–53

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Technology and Engineering, VIT, Vellore, 632014, India

    M. K. Nallakaruppan & U. Senthil Kumaran

Authors
  1. M. K. Nallakaruppan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Senthil Kumaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Nallakaruppan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nallakaruppan, M.K., Kumaran, U.S. Quick fix for obstacles emerging in management recruitment measure using IOT-based candidate selection. SOCA 12, 275–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-018-0236-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-018-0236-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation