Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Service Oriented Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be independently developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated, and upgraded. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, how microservices affect the infrastructure costs is a major evaluation topic for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison with standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale microservices, such as AWS Lambda, reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more, and unlike microservices operated by cloud customers, these specialized services help to guarantee the same performance and response times as the number of users increases. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications, and include a discussion on how to replicate the results on other cloud providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buyya R (2010) Cloud computing: the next revolution in information technology. In: 2010 1st international conference on parallel distributed and grid computing (PDGC), pp 2–3

  2. Vosshall P (2008) Web scale computing: the power of infrastructure as a service. In: Bouguettaya A, Krueger I, Margaria T (eds) Service-oriented computing ICSOC 2008. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5364. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–1

  3. Beimborn D, Miletzki T, Wenzel S (2011) Platform as a service (PaaS). Bus Inf Syst Eng 3(6):381–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schtz S, Kude T, Popp K (2013) The impact of software-as-a-service on software ecosystems. In: Herzwurm G, Margaria T (eds) Software business. From physical products to software services and solutions. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 150. Springer, Berlin, pp 130–140

  5. Lewis J, Fowler M (2014) Microservices. http://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  6. Amazon Web Services (2015) AWS Lambda. https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  7. McGovern J, Sims O, Jain A, Little M (2006) Understanding service-oriented architecture. In: Enterprise service oriented architectures. Springer Netherlands, pp 1–48. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3705-8_1

  8. La H, Bae J, Chang S, Kim S (2007) Practical methods for adapting services using enterprise service bus. In: Baresi L, Fraternali P, Houben G-J (eds) Web engineering. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4607. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–58

  9. Papazoglou M, Traverso P, Dustdar S, Leymann F (2007) Service-oriented computing: state of the art and research challenges. Computer 40:38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson J, Kotonya G, Walkerdine J, Sawyer P, Dobson G, Onditi V (2007) Evolving existing systems to service-oriented architectures: perspective and challenges. In: IEEE international conference on web services 2007, ICWS 2007, pp 896–903

  11. GIGAOM (2011) The biggest thing Amazon got right: the platform. https://gigaom.com/2011/10/12/419-the-biggest-thing-amazon-got-right-the-platform/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  12. Nginx (2015) Adopting microservices at Netflix: lessons for architectural design. http://nginx.com/blog/microservices-at-netflix-architectural-best-practices/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  13. InfoQ (2014) Scaling Gilt: from monolithic ruby application to distributed scala micro-services architecture. http://www.infoq.com/presentations/scale-gilt. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  14. InfoQ (2015) From a monolith to microservices + REST: the evolution of LinkedIn’s service architecture. http://www.infoq.com/presentations/linkedin-microservices-urn. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  15. SoundCloud (2014) Building products at SoundCloud—Part I: Dealing with the monolith. https://developers.soundcloud.com/blog/building-products-at-soundcloud-part-1-dealing-with-the-monolith. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  16. Thones J (2015) Microservices. IEEE Softw 32:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. InfoQ (2014) Microservices and SOA. http://www.infoq.com/news/2014/03/microservices-soa. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  18. Oracle (2015) Microservices and SOA. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/issue-archive/2015/15-mar/o25architect-2458702.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  19. TechTarget (2015) How microservices bring agility to SOA. http://searchcloudapplications.techtarget.com/feature/How-microservices-bring-agility-to-SOA. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  20. Microservices (2014) Pattern: microservices architecture. http://microservices.io/patterns/microservices.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  21. Vinoski S (2007) REST eye for the SOA guy. IEEE Internet Computing 11:82–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nemeth F, Steinert R, Kreuger P, Skoldstrom P (2015) Roles of DevOps tools in an automated, dynamic service creation architecture. In: 2015 IFIP/IEEE international symposium on integrated network management (IM), pp 1153–1154

  23. Bass L, Clements P, Kazman R (2012) Software Architecture in Practice, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hunt J (ed) (2014) Play framework. In: A beginner’s guide to scala, object orientation and functional programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 413–428

  25. Juneau J (ed) (2013) Building RESTful web services. In: Introducing Java EE 7. Apress, New York, pp 113–130

  26. Venkatesan V, Chaarawi M, Gabriel E, Hoefler T (2011) Design and evaluation of nonblocking collective I/O operations. In: Cotronis Y, Danalis A, Nikolopoulos D, Dongarra J (eds) Recent advances in the message passing interface. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6960. Springer, Berlin, pp 90–98

  27. Doglio F (ed) (2015) Node.js and REST. In: Pro REST API development with Node.js. Apress, New York, pp 47–63

  28. Rahmel D (ed) (2013) Testing a site with ApacheBench, JMeter, and Selenium. In: Advanced Joomla!. Apress, New York, pp 211–247

  29. InfoWorld (2015) Jaws takes a bite out of AWS Lambda app deployment. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2990795/cloud-computing/jaws-takes-a-bite-out-of-aws-lambda-app-deployment.html. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  30. Google (2016) Google Cloud Functions. https://cloud.google.com/functions/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  31. Microsoft (2016) Azure Functions. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/functions/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  32. IBM (2016) IBM Bluemix OpenWhisk. http://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/bluemix/openwhisk. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

  33. Serverless (2016) Serverless Framework. https://serverless.com/. Accessed 23 Apr 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. COMIT Research Group, Systems and Computing Engineering Department, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

    Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garcés, Lina Ochoa & Harold Castro

  2. TICSw Research Group, Systems and Computing Engineering Department, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

    Lorena Salamanca, Mauricio Verano & Rubby Casallas

  3. Project Management Department, Mapeo, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

    Santiago Gil, Carlos Valencia, Angee Zambrano & Mery Lang

Authors
  1. Mario Villamizar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oscar Garcés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lina Ochoa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Harold Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lorena Salamanca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mauricio Verano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rubby Casallas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Santiago Gil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carlos Valencia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Angee Zambrano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mery Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Villamizar.

Additional information

This work is the result of a research project partially funded by Colciencias under contract 0569-2013 “Construcción de una línea de productos de aplicaciones de crédito/cartera que serán ofrecidas a través de un Marketplace en forma SaaS para el sector no bancarizado (PYMES) de Colombia” COD. 1204-562-37152.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villamizar, M., Garcés, O., Ochoa, L. et al. Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures. SOCA 11, 233–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-017-0208-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-017-0208-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation